Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 116, Issue 1–2, pp 61–74

Morphological classification pertaining to validate the climatology and category of thunderstorms over Kolkata, India

  • Sutapa Chaudhuri
  • Sayantika Goswami
  • Anirban Middey
Original Paper

Abstract

Devastation due to thunderstorms ensues every year during the pre-monsoon months of April and May over Kolkata (22°32′ N, 88°20′ E), India. Such thunderstorms emerge from large vertical extent of cumulonimbus cloud and are associated with high speed wind squall, at times, exceeding 100 km h−1, deadly lightning flashes and heavy rainfall. The analyses of 102 such thunderstorms have been carried out in this study for morphological classification of thunderstorms over Kolkata, India, during the pre-monsoon season with bulk Richardson number and Byers and Braham theory of 0–6 km wind shear. The result reveals that according, to bulk Richardson number, 85 multicell and 17 supercell thunderstorms, whereas according to Byers and Braham theory, 33 single-cell, 59 multicell and 10 supercell thunderstorms prevailed over Kolkata during the period from 1997 to 2008 in the pre-monsoon season. The coupling of the two approaches together lead to classify the thunderstorms of Kolkata during the pre-monsoon season in two categories: super- and multicell thunderstorms. The result reveals that, out of 102 thunderstorms during the period from 1997 to 2008 in the pre-monsoon season, only 4 are of supercell category and the rest of 98 thunderstorms are of multicell category, depicting the dominance of multicell thunderstorms over Kolkata in the pre-monsoon season. The stability indices and other meteorological parameters are computed and compared for both the categories to identify the threshold ranges pertaining to reveal the climatology and to assess the predictability of both the categories. The result is validated with the observations of India Meteorological Department and Doppler Weather Radar imageries for the years 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012.

References

  1. Anderson T, Anderson M, Jacobson C, Nilsson S (1989) Thermodynamic indices for forecasting thunderstorms in southern Sweden. Meteor Mag 118:141–146Google Scholar
  2. Anthes RA (1976) Numerical prediction of severe storms—certainty, probability, or dream? Bull Amer Met Soc 57:423–430Google Scholar
  3. Basu GC, Mondal DK (2002) A forecasting aspect of thundersquall over Calcutta and its parameterization during pre-monsoon season. Mausam 53(3):271–280Google Scholar
  4. Byers HR, Braham RR (1948) Thunderstorm structure and circulation. J Meteorol 5:71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaudhuri S (2008a) Identification of the level of downdraft formation during severe thunderstorms: a frequency domain analysis. Meteorol Atmos Phys 102:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaudhuri S (2008b) Preferred type of cloud in the genesis of severe thunderstorms—a soft computing approach. Atmos Res 88(2):149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaudhuri S (2010) Convective energies in forecasting severe thunderstorms with one hidden layer neural net and variable learning rate back propagation algorithm. Asia-Pac J Atmos Sci 46(2):173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaudhuri S, Middey A (2009) Applicability of bipartite graph model for thunderstorms forecast over Kolkata. Adv Meteorol 2009:1–12Google Scholar
  9. Chaudhuri S, Middey A (2011a) Nowcasting thunderstorms with graph spectral distance and entropy estimation. Meteorol Appl 18(2):238–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaudhuri S, Middey A (2011b) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system to forecast peak gust speed during thunderstorms. Meteorol Atmos Phys. doi:10.1007/s00703-011-0158-4 Google Scholar
  11. De AC, Sen SN (1961) A radar study of pre-monsoon thunderstorms (norwesters) over Gangetic West Bengal. Indian J Meteorol Geophys 12(51–55):4Google Scholar
  12. Desai BN (1950) Mechanism of Nor'westers of Bengal. Indian J Meteorol Geophys 1(1):74–76Google Scholar
  13. Doswell CA (1987) The distinction between large-scale and mesoscale contribution to severe convection: a case study example. Wea Forecast 2:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacovides CP, Yonetani T (1990) An evaluation of stability indices for thunderstorm prediction in Greater Cyprus. Weather Forecast 5(4):559–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koteswaram P, Srinivasan V (1958) Thunderstorms over Gangetic West Bengal in the pre-monsoon season and the synoptic factors favourable for their formation. Indian J Meteorol Geophys 9(4):301–312Google Scholar
  16. Lee RR, Passner JE (1993) The development and verification of TIPS: an expert system to forecast thunderstorm occurrence. Wea Forecast 8:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lilly DK (1990) Numerical prediction of thunderstorms—has its time come? Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 116:779–798Google Scholar
  18. Neumann CJ (1971) The thunderstorm forecasting system at the Kennedy Space Center. J Appl Meteorol 10:921–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Orlanski I (1975) A rational subdivision of scales for atmospheric processes. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 56(5):527–530Google Scholar
  20. Reap RM, Foster DS (1979) Automated 12–36 hour probability forecasts of thunderstorms and severe local storms. J Appl Meteor 18:1304–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schultz P (1989) Relationship of several stability indices to convective weather events in Northest Colorado. Wea Forecast 4:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stone HM (1985) A comparison among various thermodynamic parameters for the prediction of convective activity, Part I. NOAA Technical Memorandum, NWS-ER 68, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Weisman ML, Klemp JB (1987) Characteristics of isolated convective storms. In: Ray P (ed) Mesoscale meteorology and forecasting, vol 15. American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 504–520Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sutapa Chaudhuri
    • 1
  • Sayantika Goswami
    • 1
  • Anirban Middey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of CalcuttaKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations