Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 112, Issue 3–4, pp 431–445 | Cite as

Quantitative assessment of the climate components driving the pacific decadal oscillation in climate models

  • Jae-Heung Park
  • Soon-Il An
  • Sang-Wook Yeh
  • Niklas Schneider
Original Paper

Abstract

The Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO) is defined as the first empirical orthogonal function (EOF) mode of the North Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies. In this study, we reconstructed the PDO using the first-order autoregressive model from various climate indices representing the El Niño-Southern oscillation (ENSO), Aleutian Low (AL), sea surface height (SSH), and thermocline depth over the Kuroshio–Oyashio extension (KOE) region. The climate indices were obtained from observation and twentieth-century simulations of the eight coupled general circulation models (CGCMs) participating in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project Phase III (CMIP3). In this manner, we quantitatively assessed the major climate components generating the PDO using observation and models. Based on observations, the PDO pattern in the central to eastern North Pacific was accurately reconstructed by the AL and ENSO indices, and that in the western North Pacific was best reconstructed by the SSH and thermocline indices. In the CMIP3 CGCMs, the relative contribution of each component to the generation of the PDO varied greatly from model to model, and observations, although the PDO patterns from most of the models were similar to the pattern observed. In the models, the PDO pattern in the eastern and western North Pacific were well reconstructed using the AL and SSH indices, respectively. However, the PDO pattern reconstructed by the ENSO index was quite different from the observed pattern, which was possibly due to the model's common deficiency in simulating the amplitude and location of the ENSO. Furthermore, the differences in the contribution of the KOE thermocline index between the observed pattern and most of the models indicated that the PDO pattern associated with ocean wave dynamics is not properly simulated by most models. Therefore, the virtually well simulated PDO pattern by models is a result of physically inconsistent processes.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the modeling groups, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI), and the WCRP's Working Group on Coupled Modeling (WGCM) for their roles in making available the WCRP CMIP3 multi-model data set. Support of this data set is provided by the Office of Science, US Department of Energy. This work was funded by the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under Grant CATER 2012-3043.

References

  1. Alexander MA, Deser C, Timlin MS (1999) The reemergence of SST anomalies in the North Pacific Ocean. J Clim 12:2419–2433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander MA, Bladé I, Newman M, Lanzante JR, Lau NC, Scott JD (2002) The atmospheric bridge: the influence of ENSO teleconnections on air–sea interaction over the global oceans. J Clim 15:2205–2231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. An S-I, Wang B (2005) The forced and intrinsic low-frequency models in the North Pacific. J Clim 18:876–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. An S-I (2008) A mechanism for the multi-decadal climate oscillation in the North Pacific. Theor Appl Climatol 91:77–84Google Scholar
  5. Ashok K, Behera SK, Rao SA, Weng H, Yamagata T (2007) El Niño Modoki and its possible teleconnection. J Geophys Res 112:C11007. doi: 10.1029/2006JC003798 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carton JA, Giese BS (2008) A reanalysis of ocean climate using Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (SODA). Mon Weather Rev 136:2999–3017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chhak KC, Di Lorenzo E, Schneider N, Cummins PF (2009) Forcing of low-frequency ocean variability in the northeast Pacific. J Clim 22:1255–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis RE (1976) Predictability of sea surface temperature and sea level pressure anomalies over the North Pacific Ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 6:249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deser C, Alexander MA, Timlin MS (1999) Evidence for a wind-driven intensification of the Kuroshio current extension from the 1970s to the 1980s. J Clim 12:1697–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deser C, Alexander MA, Timlin MS (2003) Understanding the persistence of sea surface temperature anomalies in midlatitudes. J Clim 16:57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Lorenzo E, Schneider N, Cobb KM, Chhak K, Franks PJS, Miller AJ, McWilliams JC, Bograd SJ, Arango H, Curchister E, Powell TM, Rivere P (2008) North Pacific Gyre Oscillation links ocean climate and ecosystem change. Geophys Res Lett 35:L08607. doi: 10.1029/2007GL032838
  12. Di Lorenzo E, Cobb KM, Furtado JC, Schneider N, Anderson BT, Bracco A, Alexander MA, Vimont DJ (2010) Central Pacific El Nino and decadal climate change in the North Pacific Ocean. Nature Geo 3:762–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emery WJ, Hamilton K (1985) Atmospheric forcing of interannual variability in the northeast Pacific Ocean: connections with El Nino. J Geophys Res 90:857–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Furtado JC, Di Lorenzo D, Schneider N, Overland JE, Bond NA (2011) North Pacific decadal variability and climate change in the IPCC AR4 models. J Clim 24:3049–3076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hasselmann K (1976) Stochastic climate models: part I, theory. Tellus 28:473–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoerling MP, Kumar A, Zhong M (1997) El Niño, La Niña, and the nonlinearity of their teleconnections. J Clim 10:1769–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Horel JD, Wallace JM (1981) Planetary scale atmospheric phenomena associated with the Southern oscillation. Mon Weather Rev 109:813–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoskins BJ, Karoly DJ (1981) The steady linear response of a spherical atmosphere to thermal and orographic forcing. J Atmos Sci 38:1179–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kao HY, Yu JY (2009) Contrasting eastern-Pacific and central-Pacific types of ENSO. J Clim 22:615–632. doi: 10.1175/2008JCLI2309.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kistler R et al (2001) The NCEP–NCAR 50-year reanalysis: monthly means CD ROM and documentation. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 82:247–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kug JS, Jin FF, An SI (2009) Two types of El Niño events: cold tongue El Niño and warm pool El Niño. J Clim 22:1499–1515. doi: 10.1175/2008JCLI2624.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kug J-S, An S-I, Ham Y-G, Kang I-S (2010) Changes in El Nino and La Nina teleconnections over North Pacific-America in the global warming simulations. Theor Appl Climatol 100:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar A, Leetmaa A, Ji M (1994) Simulations of atmospheric variability induced by sea surface temperatures and implications for global warming. Science 266:632–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Latif M, Barnett TP (1996) Decadal climate variability over the North Pacific and North America: dynamics and predictability. J Clim 9:2407–2423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lau NC, Nath MJ (1993) A modeling study of the relative roles of tropical and extratropical SST anomalies in the variability of the global atmosphere-ocean system. J Clim 7:1184–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lau NC, Nath MJ (1996) The role of the “atmospheric bridge” in linking tropical Pacific ENSO events to extratropical SST anomalies. J Clim 9:2036–2057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mantua NJ, Hare SR, Zhang Y, Wallace JM, Francis RC (1997) A Pacific decadal climate oscillation with impacts on salmon. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 78:1069–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meyers SD, Melsom A, Mitchum GT, O’Brien JJ (1998) Detection of the fast Kelvin wave teleconnection due to El Niño-Southern oscillation. J Geophys 103:27655–27663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller AJ, Schneider N (2000) Interdecadal climate regime dynamics in the North Pacific Ocean: theories, observations, and ecosystem impacts. Prog Oceanogr 47:355–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newman M, Compo GP, Alexander MA (2003) ENSO-forced variability of the Pacific decadal oscillation. J Clim 16:853–3857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Niebauer HJ (1988) Effects of El Niño-Southern oscillation and North Pacific weather patterns on interannual variability in the southern Bering Sea. J Geophys Res 93:5051–5068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Overland JE, Wang M (2007) Futrue climate of the North Pacific Ocean. Eos Trans Amer Ceophys Union 88(16):178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pierce DW, Barnett TP, Latif M (2000) Connections between the Pacific Ocean Tropics and midlatitudes on decadal timescales. J Clim 13:1173–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Power S, Casey T, Folland C, Colman A, Mehta V (1999) Inter-decadal modulation of the impact of ENSO on Australia. Clim Dyn 15:319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schneider N, Cornuelle BD (2005) The forcing of the Pacific decadal oscillation. J Clim 18:4355–4373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith TM, Reynolds RW, Peterson TC, Lawrimore J (2008) Improvements to NOAA's historical merged land-ocean surface temperature analysis (1880–2006). J Clim 21:2283–2296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Taguchi B, Xie SP, Schneider N, Nonaka M, Sasaki H, Sasai Y (2007) Decadal variability of the Kuroshio extension: observations and an eddy-resolving model hindcast. J Clim 20:2357–2377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Trenberth KE, Hurrel JW (1994) Decadal atmospheric-ocean variations in the Pacific. Clim Dyn 9:303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Uppala SM et al (2005) The ERA-40 re-analysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 131:2961–3012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jae-Heung Park
    • 1
  • Soon-Il An
    • 1
  • Sang-Wook Yeh
    • 2
  • Niklas Schneider
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric SciencesYonsei UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Marine ScienceHanyang UniversityAnsanSouth Korea
  3. 3.International Pacific Research CenterUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations