Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 111, Issue 3–4, pp 609–622 | Cite as

What happened to surface temperature with sunspot activity in the past 130 years?

  • Jianjun XuEmail author
  • Alfred M. PowellJr.
Original Paper

Abstract

Based on composite analysis using categories of solar inactivity and activity, the responses of surface temperature to different categorized solar activity and a plausible mechanism have been discussed. The results show the increasing solar sunspot activity during solar cycles 13 to 24 (1880–2010) and it seemed to make a positive contribution to rising global temperature. However, the sunspots were fewer in number, if we focused on the most recent 60 years (1950–2010), and the decreasing solar activity did not contribute to a cooler Earth. This result indicates that the connection between sunspots and the Earth’s climate is sensitive to the study period. An extreme analysis was performed in an attempt to gain a better understanding of solar impacts. The extreme top 10 composite analysis demonstrated that the surface temperature response to solar activity is spatially different and is highly sensitive to El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events. The most sensitive areas in the Pacific sector revealed a significant difference between including and excluding ENSO years. During the solar inactive years, the tropical eastern Pacific was observed as a weak El Niño-like (strong La Niña-like) pattern in the composite including (excluding) ENSO events. Another interesting feature is the strong similarity in the composites which include or exclude ENSO events during the sunspot active years, but it differs from the La Niña-like pattern observed in previous studies. The bottom-up mechanism associated with the response of the surface dynamical circulation and the heat balance when compared to the total solar irradiance forcing partially explains the connection.

Keywords

Solar Activity Latent Heat Flux Total Solar Irradiance Arctic Oscillation Maunder Minimum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Twentieth Century Monthly Reanalysis data were obtained from the NCAR website. The long-term reconstructed surface temperature data set is from the Fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project and the solar sunspot numbers were obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)/National Geophysical Data Center website. The authors would like to thank these agencies and research groups for providing the data. This work was supported by the NOAA, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, and Center for Satellite Applications and Research. The views, opinions, and findings contained in this publication are those of the authors and should not be considered an official NOAA or US Government position, policy, or decision.

References

  1. Compo GP, Whitaker JS, Sardeshmukh PD, Matsui N, Allan RJ, Yin X, Gleason BE, Vose RS, Rutledge G, Bessemoulin P, Brönnimann S, Brunet M, Crouthamel RI, Grant AN, Groisman PY, Jones PD, Kruk M, Kruger AC, Marshall GJ, Maugeri M, Mok HY, Nordli Ø, Ross TF, Trigo RM, Wang XL, Woodruff SD, Worley SJ (2011) The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project, Quarterly J Roy. Meteorol Soc 137:1–28. doi: 10.1002/qj.776 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deser C (2000) On the teleconnectivity of the “Arctic Oscillation”. Geophys Res Lett 27(6):779–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eddy JA (1976) The Maunder Minimum. Sci 192:1189–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fröhlich C, Lean J (1998) Sun’s total irradiance: cycles, trends and related climate change uncertainties since 1976. Geophys Res Lett 25:4377–4380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fröhlich C, Lean J (2004) Solar radiative output and its variability: evidence and mechanisms. Astron Astrophys Rev 12:273–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gray LJ et al (2010) Solar influences on climate. Rev Geophys 48:RG4001. doi: 10.1029/2009RG000282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haigh JD (1996) The impact of solar variability on climate. Sci 272:981–984. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5264.981 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haigh J (2003) The effects of solar variability on the Earth's climate, Philos. Trans R Soc Ser A 361:95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haigh JD, Winning AR, Toumi R, Harder JW (2010) An influence of solar spectral variations on radiative forcing of climate. Nat 467:696–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herman JR and RA Goldberg (1978) Sun, weather and climate, NASA Spec. Publ., 426Google Scholar
  11. Herschel W (1801) Observations tending to investigate the nature of the Sun, in order to find the causes or symptoms of its variable emission of light and heat: with remarks on the use that may possibly be drawn from solar observations. Philos Trans R Soc London 91:265–318. doi: 10.1098/rstl.1801.0015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hurrell J, Hack J, Shea D, Caron J, Rosinski J (2008) A new sea surface temperature and sea ice boundary data set for the Community Atmosphere Model. J Clim 21:5145–5153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huth R, Bochnicek J, Hejda P (2007) The 11-year solar cycle affects the intensity and annularity of the Arctic Oscillation. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 69(9):1095–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate change 2001: solar forcing of climate. Working Group I: The Scientific Basis. Retrieved 2005-03-10Google Scholar
  15. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate change 2007: the physical sciences basis, Cambridge University Press, New York (2007). Available at http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html
  16. Keckhut P, Hauchecorne A, Chanin M (1995) Midlatitude long term variability of the middle atmosphere: trends and cyclic and episodic changes. J Geophy Res 100:18887–18897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kodera K, Kuroda (2002) Solar cycle modulation of the North Atlantic Oscillation: implications in the spatial structure of the NAO. Geophys Res Lett 29(8):1218. doi: 10.1029/2001GL014557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Labitzke K (1987) Sunspots, the QBO and the stratospheric temperature in the north polar region. Geophys Res Lett 14:535–537. doi: 10.1029/GL014i005p00535 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Labitzke K, van Loon H (1993) Some recent studies of probable connections between solar and atmospheric variability, Ann. Geophysicae 11:1084–1094Google Scholar
  20. Laut P (2003) Solar activity and terrestrial climate: an analysis of some purported correlations. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 65:801–812. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6826(03)00041-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lean J (2006) Comment on “Estimated solar contribution to the global surface warming using the ACRIM TSI satellite composite” by N. Scafetta and B. J. West. Geophys Res Lett 33:L15701. doi: 10.1029/2005GL025342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lean J, Rind D (1998) Climate forcing by changing solar radiation. J Clim 11:3069–3094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lean J, Beer J, Bradley R (1995) Reconstruction of solar irradiance since 1610: Implications for climate change. Geophys Res Lett 22:3195–3198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee JN, Shindell DT, Hameed S (2009) The influence of solar forcing on tropical circulation. J Clim 22:5870–5885. doi: 10.1175/2009JCLI2670.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lockwood M (2010) Solar change and climate: an update in the light of the current exceptional solar minimum. Proc R Soc A 466:303–329. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2009.0519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luterbacher J, Dietrich D, Xoplaki E, Grosjean M, Wanner H (2004) European seasonal and annual temperature variability, trends and extremes since 1500. Sci 303:1499–1503. doi: 10.1126/science.1093877 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meehl GA, Washington WM, Wigley TML, Arblaster JM, Dai A (2003) Solar and greenhouse gas forcing and climate response in the 20th century. J Clim 16:426–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meehl GA, Arblaster JM, Branstator G, van Loon H (2008) A coupled air–sea response mechanism to solar forcing in the Pacific region. J Clim 21:2883–2897. doi: 10.1175/2007JCLI1776.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meehl GA, Arblaster JM, Sassi F, Matthes K, van Loon H (2009) Additive mechanisms amplify the Pacific climate system response to solar forcing. Sci 325:1114–1118. doi: 10.1126/science.1172872 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pittock AB (1978) A critical look at long–term Sun–weather relationships. Rev Geophys 16:400–420. doi: 10.1029/RG016i003p00400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Powell A, Xu J (2011a) Comparisons of temperature response to solar forcing in the pre- and post periods of satellite data assimilation. Int J Climatol 31:2312–2329. doi: 10.1002/joc.2239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Powell A, Xu J (2011b) Possible solar forcing of interannual and decadal stratospheric planetary wave variability in the Northern Hemisphere: an observational study. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 73:825–838. doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2011.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Quadrelli R, Bretherton CS, Wallace JM (2005) On sampling errors in empirical orthogonal functions. J Clim 18:3704–3710. doi: 10.1175/JCLI3500.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Quinn W, Neal V, De Mayolo S (1987) El Niño occurrences over the past four and a half centuries. J Geophys Res 92(C13):14449–14461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reid GC (1987) Influence of solar variability on global sea surface temperatures. Nat 329:142–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rind D, Lean J, Lerner J, Lonergan P, Leboissitier A (2008) Exploring the stratospheric/ tropospheric response to solar forcing. J Geophys Res 113:D24103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scafetta N, West BJ (2005) Estimated solar contribution to the global surface warming using the ACRIM TSI satellite composite. Geophys Res Lett 32:L18713. doi: 10.1029/2005GL023849 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scafetta N, West BJ (2006) Reply to comment by J. L. Lean on “Estimated solar contribution to the global surface warming using the ACRIM TSI satellite composite”. Geophys Res Lett 33:L15702. doi: 10.1029/2006GL025668.
  39. Shindell D, Rind D, Balachandran N, Lean J, Lonergan P (1999) Solar cycle variability, ozone and climate. Sci 284:305–308. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5412.305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shindell D, Faluvegi G, Miller RL, Schmidt GA, Hansen JE, Sun S (2006) Solar and anthropogenic forcing of tropical hydrology. Geophys Res Lett 33:L24706. doi: 10.1029/2006GL027468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thejll P (2001) Decadal power in land air temperatures: is it statistically significant? J Geophys Res 106(D23):31693–31702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Loon H, Meehl GA, Shea DJ (2007) Coupled air-sea response to solar forcing in the Pacific region during northern winter. J Geophys Res 112:D02108. doi: 10.1029/2006JD007378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. White WB, Liu Z (2008a) Resonant response of the quasi-decadal oscillation to the 11-yr period signal in the Sun’s irradiance. J Geophys Res 113:C01002. doi: 10.1029/2006JC004057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. White WB, Liu Z (2008b) Nonlinear alignment of El Nino to the 11-yr solar cycle. Geophys Res Lett 35:L19607. doi: 10.1029/2008GL034831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Willson RC, Hudson HS (1991) The Sun's luminosity over a complete solar cycle. Nat 351(6321):42–4. doi: 10.1038/351042a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Willson RC, Mordvinov AV (2003) Secular total solar irradiance trend during solar cycles 21-23. Geophys Res Lett 30(5):3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xu J, Chan JCL (2001) The role of Asian/Australian monsoon in the onset time of the El Niño events. J Clim 14:418–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Science and Technology Center, College of ScienceGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.NOAA/NESDIS/STARCamp SpringsUSA

Personalised recommendations