Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 108, Issue 1–2, pp 31–38

Quantification of the urban heat island under a changing climate over Anatolian Peninsula

  • Huseyin Ozdemir
  • Alper Unal
  • Tayfun Kindap
  • Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu
  • Zeynep Okay Durmusoglu
  • Maudood Khan
  • Mete Tayanc
  • Mehmet Karaca
Original Paper

Abstract

The Anatolian Peninsula is located at the confluence of Europe, Asia, and Africa and houses 81 cities of which 79 of them have population over 100,000. We employed some criteria to select the cities from the 81 cities. After accomplishing all the criteria, eight cities were remaining for the study. Nonparametric Mann–Kendall test procedure was employed for the urban and rural stations of these cities to detect the long-term change in temperature trends. Statistical analysis of daily minimum temperatures for the period between 1965 and 2006 suggest that there is no statistically significant increase in rural areas. In contrast to the findings of the previous studies, however, all the urban sites and difference between urban and rural pairs show significant increase in temperatures, a strong indication for the existence of urban heat island (UHI) affect over the region. Regional Climate Model was also utilized to assess the changes in temperature by the end of century for the region. The findings suggest that an increase of up to 5°C is possible. Climate change effects enforced with UHI have the potential to cause serious problems for the entire region and hence needs to be studied thoroughly.

References

  1. Ezber Y, Sen OL, Kindap T, Karaca M (2007) Climatic effects of urbanization in Istanbul: a statistical and modeling analysis. Int J Climatol 27:667–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gill SE, Handley JF, Ennos AR, Pauleit S, Theuray N, Lindley S (2008) Characterising the urban environment of UK cities and towns: a template for landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plann 87:210–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Giorgi F, Lionello P (2008) Climate change projections for the Mediterranean Region. Glob Planet Chang 63:90–104. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hua LJ, Ma ZG, Guo WD (2007) The impact of urbanization on air temperature across China. Theor Appl Climatol. doi:10.1007/s00704-007-0339-8
  5. Huang S, Taniguchi M, Yamano M, Wang C (2009) Detecting urbanization effects on surface and subsurface thermal environment—a case study of Osaka. Sci Total Environ 407:3142–3152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. IPCC, Climate Change (2007) Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK and Reisinger A (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  7. Karaca M, Tayanc M, Toros H (1995) Effects of urbanization on climate of Istanbul and Ankara. Atmos Environ 29:3411–3421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kataoka K, Matsumoto F, Ichinose T, Taniguchi M (2009) Urban warming trends in several large Asian cities over the last 100 years. Sci Total Environ 407:3112–3119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kendall MG (1975) Rank correlation methods. Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Kolokotroni M, Giridharan R (2008) Urban heat island intensity in London: an investigation of the impact of physical characteristics on changes in outdoor air temperature during summer. Sol Energ 82:986–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mann H (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259 Google Scholar
  12. Oke T. R. (1987) Boundary layer climates, 2nd edn. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Oke TR, Zeuner G, Jauregui E (1992) The surface energy balance in Mexico City. Atmos Environ 26(B):433–444Google Scholar
  14. Rosenzweig C, Solecki WD, Parshall L, Chopping M, Pope G, Goldberg R (2005) Characterizing the urban heat island in current and future climates in New Jersey. Environmental Hazards 6:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stern Review (2006) The economics of climate change. UK TreasuryGoogle Scholar
  16. Tayanç M, Toros H (1997) Urbanization effects on regional climate change in the case of four large cities of Turkey. Clim Chang 35:501–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. TUIK (2008) Turkish Statistics Institute. http://www.tuik.gov.tr. Accessed 11 September 2008
  18. Unal Y, Kindap T, Karaca M (2003) Redefining the climate zones of Turkey using cluster analysis. Int J Climatol 23:1045–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund) (2007) State of world population. Unleashing the potential of urban growth. http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2007/english/introduction.html. Accessed 14 December 2009
  20. WMO (2009) World Meteorological Organization statement on the status of the global climate in 2008. WMO-No. 1039; 2009. http://www.wmo.int/wcc3/documents/1039_en.pdf. Accessed 21 January 2010

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huseyin Ozdemir
    • 1
    • 7
  • Alper Unal
    • 2
  • Tayfun Kindap
    • 2
  • Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu
    • 3
  • Zeynep Okay Durmusoglu
    • 4
  • Maudood Khan
    • 5
  • Mete Tayanc
    • 6
    • 7
  • Mehmet Karaca
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental EngineeringBahcesehir UniversityBesiktasTurkey
  2. 2.Eurasia Institute of Earth SciencesIstanbul Technical UniversityMaslakTurkey
  3. 3.Institute of InformaticsIstanbul Technical UniversityMaslakTurkey
  4. 4.The Scientific and Technological Research Council of TurkeyKavaklidereTurkey
  5. 5.National Space Science and Technology Center NASAGeorge C. Marshall Space Flight CenterHuntsvilleUSA
  6. 6.Faculty of EngineeringCyprus International UniversityHaspolat, NicosiaCyprus
  7. 7.Department of Environmental EngineeringMarmara UniversityGoztepeTurkey

Personalised recommendations