Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 105, Issue 1–2, pp 71–81 | Cite as

Phenological observations made by the I. R. Bohemian Patriotic–Economic Society, 1828–1847

  • Rudolf Brázdil
  • Monika Bělínová
  • Jaroslav Rožnovský
Original Paper

Abstract

Scholarly and economic management societies played an important role in the beginnings of meteorological observations in Central Europe. In Bohemia, one such was the “Imperial Royal Patriotic–Economic Society of Bohemia” which, as well as making meteorological observations, organised a network of phenological stations and published the results of their observations from 1828 to 1847. The phenological observations covered 31 different forest plants, fruit trees and field-crops. Some of the phenological stations continued to make observations within the network of the Central Institute for Meteorology and Earth Magnetism established in Vienna in 1851. Analysis of the above observations led to the collation of information on the temporal and spatial distribution of the observed phenological characteristics (beginning of budding and/or foliage, beginning and end of flowering, ripeness of seeds and fruits) in the 1828–1847 period, which was cooler and generally wetter with respect to more recent temperature and precipitation patterns (1961–1990) in the study area. Phenophases of flowering and ripeness for selected plants are presented for the Hradec Králové and Loket stations, showing late onsets in this period in comparison with recent phenological stations located nearby and taking measurements in 1993–2009. Working up this topic makes a contribution to the historical phenology of the nineteenth century in the Czech Lands and in Central Europe as well.

References

  1. Atlas podnebí Československé republiky (Climatic Atlas of the Czechoslovak Republic). Ústřední správa geodesie a kartografie, Praha 1958Google Scholar
  2. Bauer Z, Bauerová J, Krška B (2009) Vliv vývoje klimatu na průběh fenofáze kvetení ovocných dřevin na jižní Moravě v letech 1951–2000 (The impact of climate evolution on the course of fruit trees flowering phenophase in Southern Moravia in the 1951–2000 years). Meteorol Zpr 62:107–112Google Scholar
  3. Brázdil R, Budíková M (1999) An urban bias in air temperature fluctuations at the Klementinum, Prague, the Czech Republic. Atmos Environ 33:4211–4217. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00163-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brázdil R, Kotyza O (2000) History of weather and climate in the Czech Lands IV. Utilisation of economic sources for the study of climate fluctuation in the Louny region in the fifteenth–seventeenth centuries. Masaryk University, Brno, p 350Google Scholar
  5. Brázdil R, Dobrovolný P, Elleder L, Kakos V, Kotyza O, Květoň V, Macková J, Müller M, Štekl J, Tolasz R, Valášek H (2005) Historické a současné povodně v České republice (Historical and Recent Floods in the Czech Republic). Masarykova univerzita, Český hydrometeorologický ústav, Praha, p 370Google Scholar
  6. Brázdil R, Zahradníček P, Dobrovolný P, Kotyza O, Valášek H (2008) Historical and recent viticulture as a source of climatological knowledge in the Czech Republic. Geografie 113:351–371Google Scholar
  7. Brázdil R, Dobrovolný P, Luterbacher J, Moberg A, Pfister C, Wheeler D, Zorita E (2010) European climate of the past 500 years: new challenges for historical climatology. Clim Change 101:7–40. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9783-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chuine I, Yiou P, Viovy N, Seguin B, Daux V, Le Roy LE (2004) Historical phenology: grape ripening as a past climate indicator. Nature 432:289–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahl A, Langvall O (2008) Observations on phenology in Sweden – past and present. In: COST Action 725—The history and current status of plant phenology in Europe. COST Office, Brussels, pp 161–165Google Scholar
  10. David A (1817) Ursachen und Vorschriften, warum und wie die Witterungs-Beobachtungen anzustellen sind. Gottlieb Haase, Prag, p 16Google Scholar
  11. David A (1825) Nachricht von den Witterungsbeobachtungen, welche die kais. kön. patriotisch-ökonomische Gesellschaft in den Kreisen Böhmens veranstaltet hat. Erste Lieferung vom Jahre 1817 bis 1819. Gottlieb Haase Söhne, Prag, p 57 + tablesGoogle Scholar
  12. David A (1826) Fortsetzung der Witterungsbeobachtungen, welche die kais. kön. patriotisch-ökonomische Gesellschaft in den Kreisen Böhmens veranstaltet hat. Zweite Lieferung vom Jahre 1820 bis 1821. Gottlieb Haase Söhne, Prag, p 56 + tablesGoogle Scholar
  13. David A (1827) Anleitung zu den Witterungsbeobachtungen und zur Verfassung der land- und forstwirthschaftlichen Jahres Berichte von der k. k. patriotisch-ökonomischen Gesellschaft für ihre beobachtenden und berichterstattenden Mitglieder im Königreiche Böhmen. Gottlieb Haase Söhne, Prag, p 38 + appendicesGoogle Scholar
  14. Demarée G (2009) The phenological observations and networking of Adolphe Quetelet at the Royal Observatory of Brussels. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology 14:22–24Google Scholar
  15. Demarée GR, Rutishauer T (2009) Origins of the word “phenology”. Eos Trans AGU 90:291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Etien N, Daux V, Masson-Delmotte V, Stievenard M, Bernard V, Durost S, Guillemin MT, Mestre O, Pierre M (2008) A bi-proxy reconstruction of Fontainebleau (France) growing season temperature from A.D. 1596 to 2000. Clim Past 4:91–106. doi:10.5194/cp-4-91-2008 Google Scholar
  17. Fenologická ročenka Československé republiky 1938–1955 (Phenological yearbook of the Czechoslovak Republic 1938–1955). Hydrometeorologický ústav, Praha 1953–1963Google Scholar
  18. Fritsch C (1852) Kalender der Flora des Horizontes von Prag. Sitzungsberichte der mathem.-naturw. Classe der kais. Akademie der Wissenschaften (Anhang zum Jännerheft), Wien, p 110Google Scholar
  19. Fritsch C (1854) Beobachtungen über periodische Erscheinungen im Pflanzen- und Thierreiche. In: Kreil K Jahrbücher der k. k. Central-Anstalt für Meteorologie und Erdmagnetismus. II. Band – Jahrgang 1850. In Commission bei W. Braumüller, Wien, pp 211–219Google Scholar
  20. Fritsch C (1855) Entwurf eines Systemes zur Ausführung von Vegetations-Beobachtungen im k. k. botanischen Garten in Wien. In: Kreil K Jahrbücher der k. k. Central-Anstalt für Meteorologie und Erdmagnetismus. III. Band – Jahrgang 1851 (Anhang). In Commission bei W. Braumüller, Wien, pp 19–29Google Scholar
  21. Fritsch K (1858) II. Vegetationsbeobachtungen, angestellt an mehreren Orten der österreichischen Monarchie im Jahre 1853. In: Kreil K Jahrbücher der k. k. Central-Anstalt für Meteorologie und Erdmagnetismus. V. Band – Jahrgang 1853 (Anhang). In Commission bei K. Gerold’s Sohn, Wien, pp 20–34Google Scholar
  22. Guiot J, Nicault A, Rathegeber C, Edouard JL, Guibal F, Pichard G, Till C (2005) Last-millenium summer temperature variations in western Europe based on proxy data. Holocene 15:489–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hammerl C, Lenhardt W, Steinacker R, Steinhauser P (eds) (2001) Die Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik 1851–2001. 150 Jahre Meteorologie und Geophysik in Österreich. Leykam Buchverlagsgesellschaft, Graz, p 838Google Scholar
  24. Jatczak K, Walawender J (2009) Average rate of phenological changes in Poland according to climatic changes—evaluation and mapping. Adv Sci Res 3:127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kakos V, Munzar J (2000) Zima 1829/30—nejtužší ve střední Evropě od počátku měření teploty vzduchu (The 1829/30 winter – the most severe in Central Europe from the beginning of air temperature measurements). Meteorol Zpr 53:103–108Google Scholar
  26. Keenan DJ (2007) Grape harvest dates are poor indicators of summer warmth. Theor Appl Climatol 87:255–256. doi:10.1007/s00704-006-0197-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kington J (1974) The Societas Meteorologica Palatina: an eighteenth century meteorological society. Weather 25:169–175Google Scholar
  28. Koch E, Demarée G, Lipa W, Zach S, Zimmermann K (2008a) History of international phenology networks. In: COST Action 725—The history and current status of plant phenology in Europe. COST Office, Brussels, pp 12–16Google Scholar
  29. Koch E, Lipa W, Neumcke R, Zach S (2008b) The history and current status of the Austrian phenology network. In: COST Action 725—The history and current status of plant phenology in Europe. COST Office, Brussels, pp 22–28Google Scholar
  30. Koch E, Dittmann E, Lipa W, Menzel A, Nekovar J, Sparks TH, van Vliet AJH (2009) COST725—establishing a European phenological data platform for climatological applications: major results. Adv Sci Res 3:119–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kostlivý S (s.a.) Zusammenstellung der Monat- und Jahresmittel, sowie der Extreme aus den meteorologischen Beobachtungen zu Bodenbach in Böhmen für die Jahre 1828–1873. Reprint, p 24Google Scholar
  32. Kott I, Nekovář J, Helman K (2009) Two centuries of phenological observation in Middle Bohemia. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology 14:29–32Google Scholar
  33. Kreil K (1841–1847) Magnetische und meteorologische Beobachtungen zu Prag. Erster Band (Vom 1. Juli 1839 bis 31. Juli 1840)—Siebenter Jahrgang (Vom 1. Jänner bis 31. December 1846). Gottlieb Haase Söhne, PragGoogle Scholar
  34. Kreil K (1854a) Jahrbücher der k. k. Central-Anstalt für Meteorologie und Erdmagnetismus. I. Band—Jahrgang 1848 und 1849. In Commission bei W. Braumüller, Wien, p 420Google Scholar
  35. Kreil K (1854b) Jahrbücher der k. k. Central-Anstalt für Meteorologie und Erdmagnetismus. II. Band—Jahrgang 1850. In Commission bei W. Braumüller, Wien, p 257Google Scholar
  36. Kreil K, Jelinek K (1848–1851) Magnetische und meteorologische Beobachtungen zu Prag. Achter Jahrgang (Vom 1. Jänner bis 31. December 1847) – Zehnter Jahrgang (Vom 1. Jänner bis 31. December 1849). Gottlieb Haase Söhne, PragGoogle Scholar
  37. Kürbis K, Mudelsee M, Tetzlaff G, Brázdil R (2009) Trends in extremes of temperature, dew point, and precipitation from long instrumental series from Central Europe. Theor Appl Climatol 98:187–195. doi:10.1007/s00704-008-0094-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luterbacher J, Liniger MA, Menzel A, Estrella N, Della-Marta PM, Pfister C, Rutishauser T, Xoplaki E (2007) The exceptional European warmth of autumn 2006 and winter 2007: historical context, the underlying dynamics and its phenological impacts. Geophys Res Lett 34:L12704. doi:10.1029/2007GL029951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mariani L, Parisi S, Failla O, Cola G, Zoia G, Bonardi L (2009) Tirano (1624–1930): a long time series of harvest dates for grapevine. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology 14:7–16Google Scholar
  40. Maurer C, Koch E, Hammerl C, Hammerl T, Pokorny E (2009) BACCHUS temperature reconstruction for the period 16th to 18th centuries from Viennese and Klosterneuburg grape harvest dates. J Geophys Res 114:D22106. doi:10.1029/2009JD011730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meier N, Rutishauser T, Pfister C, Wanner H, Luterbacher J (2007) Grape harvest dates as a proxy for Swiss April to August temperature reconstructions back to AD 1480. Geophys Res Lett 34:L20705. doi:10.1029/2007GL031381 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Menzel A (2005) A 500-year pheno-climatological view on the 2003 heatwave in Europe assessed by grape harvest dates. Meteorol Z 14:75–77. doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0014-0075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kübler K, Bissolli P, Braslavská O, Briede A, Chmielewski FM, Crepinsek Z, Curnel Y, Dahl Å, Defila C, Donnelly A, Filella Y, Jatczak K, Måge F, Mestre A, Nordli Ø, Peñuelas J, Pirinen P, Remišová V, Scheinfinger H, Striz M, Susnik A, van Vliet AJH, Wielgolaski FE, Zach S, Zust A (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Global Change Biology 12:1969–1976. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01193.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miháliková I (1983) 60 let fenologické staniční sítě (60 years of the phenological network). Meteorol Zpr 36:187–188Google Scholar
  45. Možný M, Nekovář J (2007) Dlouhodobé kolísání počátku vegetační sezony v Polabí v letech 1876–2005 (Long-term fluctuations in beginning of the vegetal season in Polabí in the years of 1876–2005). Meteorol Zpr 60:23–26Google Scholar
  46. Možný M, Brázdil R, Dobrovolný P, Trnka M (2010) Cereal harvest dates in the Czech Republic between 1501 and 2008 as a proxy for March–June temperature reconstruction. Clim Change, submittedGoogle Scholar
  47. Nejedlik P, Szalai S (2009) Phenological records in Carpathians in nineteenth century and their possible use. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology 14:25–28Google Scholar
  48. Nekovář J (2008) The history and current status of Czech plant phenology. In: COST Action 725—The history and current status of plant phenology in Europe. COST Office, Brussels, pp 51–57Google Scholar
  49. Nekovář J, Hájková L (2010) Fenologická pozorování v Česku—historie a současnost (Phenological observations in Czechia—history and present). Meteorol Zpr 63:13–20Google Scholar
  50. Nekovář J, Koch E, Kubin E, Nejedlík P, Sparks T, Wielgolaski FE (eds) (2008) COST Action 725—The history and current status of plant phenology in Europe. COST Office, Brussels, p 182Google Scholar
  51. Neue Schriften der kais. königl. patriotisch-ökonomischen Gesellschaft im Königreiche Böhmen. Gottlieb Haase Söhne, Prag 1830–1847Google Scholar
  52. Pejml K (1975) 200 let meteorologické observatoře v pražském Klementinu (200 years of the meteorological observatory in Prague Klementinum). HMÚ, Praha, p 80Google Scholar
  53. Pejml K (1976) Poznámky k dějinám české meteorologie v období 1817–1851 (Notes to the history of Czech meteorology in the 1817–1851 period). Meteorol Zpr 29:21–27Google Scholar
  54. Phenologická ročenka československá 1927–1937 (Czechoslovak phenological yearbook 1927–1937). Zprávy výzkumných ústavů zemědělských ČSR, Praha 1930–1938Google Scholar
  55. Puppi G, Zanotti AL (2009) Old phenological data on wild plants in Italy. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology 14:17–21Google Scholar
  56. Rožnovský J, Ehrenbergerová J (2006) Vliv délky fenofází a počasí na obsah beta-glukanů při šlechtění jarního ječmene (The influence of phenophases length and weather on the beta-glucan content at improving of spring barley). In: Rožnovský J, Litschmann T, Vyskot I (eds) Fenologická odezva proměnlivosti podnebí. Český hydrometeorologický ústav, Praha, p 24Google Scholar
  57. Rožnovský J, Jůzl M, Středa T (2006) Fenologické spektrum raných brambor (Phenological spectrum of early potatoes). In: Rožnovský J, Litschmann T, Vyskot I (eds) Fenologická odezva proměnlivosti podnebí. Český hydrometeorologický ústav, Praha, p 25Google Scholar
  58. Rutishauser T, Luterbacher J, Defila C, Frank D, Wanner H (2008) Swiss Spring Plant Phenology 2007: Extremes, a multi-century perspective and changes in temperature sensitivity. Geophys Res Lett 35:L05703. doi:10.1029/2007GL032545
  59. Rutishauer T, Schleip C, Sparks TH, Nordli Ø, Menzel A, Wanner H, Jeanneret F, Luterbacher J (2009) Temperature sensitivity of Swiss and British plant phenology from 1753 to 1958. Clim Res 39:179–190. doi:10.3354/cr00810 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schleip C, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Menzel A (2009) Spatial variation in onset dates and trends in phenology across Europe. Clim Res 39:249–260. doi:10.3354/cr00830 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sparks TH, Menzel A, Stenseth NC (2009) European cooperation in plant phenology. Clim Res 39:175–177. doi:10.3354/cr00829 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Střeštík J, Verő J (2000) Reconstruction of the spring temperatures in the 18th century based on the measured lengths of grapevine sprout. Időjárás 104:123–136Google Scholar
  63. Stříž M, Nekovář J (2009) Porovnání nástupu fenofází a teploty vzduchu v letech 1956–1980 a 1981–2005 v Česku (Comparison of phenophases onsets and air temperature in the years of 1956–1980 and 1981–2005 in Czechia). Meteorol Zpr 62:89–96Google Scholar
  64. Svitáková Z, Kott I, Nekovář J (2005) Fenologická data za posledních 150 let (Phenological data in the last 150 years). In: Rožnovský J, Litschmann T (eds) Bioklimatologie současnosti a budoucnosti. Křtiny 12.–14.9.2005 (CD-ROM)Google Scholar
  65. Štěpánek P (2004) Homogenizace teploty vzduchu na území České republiky v období přístrojových pozorování (Homogenisation of air temperature in the territory of the Czech Republic in the period of instrumental observations). Český hydrometeorologický ústav, Praha, p 56Google Scholar
  66. Terhivuo J, Kubin E, Karhu J (2009) Phenological observation since the days of Linné in Finland. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology 14:45–49Google Scholar
  67. Tolasz R, Míková T, Valeriánová A, Voženílek V (eds) (2007) Atlas podnebí Česka (Climatic Atlas of Czechia). Český hydrometeorologický ústav, Univerzita Palackého, Praha, Olomouc, p 256Google Scholar
  68. Verhandlungen und Mittheilungen der k. k. patriotisch-ökonomischen Gesellschaft im Königreiche Böhmen, und des mit ihr verbundenen Schafzüchter-, so wie des pomologischen Vereins. Erster Band. Friedrich Tempsky, Prag 1849, p 419 + appendicesGoogle Scholar
  69. Verhandlungen und Mittheilungen der k. k. patriotisch-ökonomischen Gesellschaft im Königreiche Böhmen, und des mit ihr verbundenen pomologischen, so wie des Schafzüchter-Vereines. Zweiter Band. Friedrich Tempsky, Prag 1850, p 300 + appendixGoogle Scholar
  70. Volf M (1967) Organizační vývoj Vlasteneckohospodářské společnosti (Organisational development of the Patriotic-Economic Society). Vědecké práce československého zemědělského muzea 7:67–81Google Scholar
  71. Wielgolaski FE (2009) Old Norwegian phenodata series in relation to recent ones. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology 14:33–38Google Scholar
  72. Zahradníček P, Hájková L (2009) Vliv meteorologických prvků na vybrané fenologické fáze révy vinné a jejich časová dynamika (Influence of meteorological elements on phenological phases of vine and their temporal dynamics). Meteorol Zpr 62:80–88Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rudolf Brázdil
    • 1
  • Monika Bělínová
    • 1
  • Jaroslav Rožnovský
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of GeographyMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Czech Hydrometeorological InstituteBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations