Temporal downscaling: a comparison between artificial neural network and autocorrelation techniques over the Amazon Basin in present and future climate change scenarios
Several studies have been devoted to dynamic and statistical downscaling for both climate variability and climate change. This paper introduces an application of temporal neural networks for downscaling global climate model output and autocorrelation functions. This method is proposed for downscaling daily precipitation time series for a region in the Amazon Basin. The downscaling models were developed and validated using IPCC AR4 model output and observed daily precipitation. In this paper, five AOGCMs for the twentieth century (20C3M; 1970–1999) and three SRES scenarios (A2, A1B, and B1) were used. The performance in downscaling of the temporal neural network was compared to that of an autocorrelation statistical downscaling model with emphasis on its ability to reproduce the observed climate variability and tendency for the period 1970–1999. The model test results indicate that the neural network model significantly outperforms the statistical models for the downscaling of daily precipitation variability.
KeywordsAutocorrelation Autocorrelation Function Daily Precipitation Amazon Basin Statistical Downscaling
The present work was supported by the FAPESP grant 07/50145-4, and Jose A. Marengo was funded by the Brazilian Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico—CNPq. We are also grateful for the helpful comments made by anonymous reviewers.
- Boulanger JP, Martinez F, Segura EC (2007) Projection of future climate change conditions using IPCC simulations, neural networks and Bayesian statistics. Part 2: precipitation mean state and seasonal cycle in South America. Clim Dyn 2:255–271Google Scholar
- Hulme M, Jenkins GJ, Lu X, Turnpenny JR, Mitchell TD, Jones RG, Lowe J, Murphy JM, Hassell D, Boorman P, Macdonald R, Hill S (2002) Climate-change scenarios for the United Kingdom: the UKCIP02 Scientific Report. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. School of Environmental Sciences. University of East Anglia, Norwich, p 120Google Scholar
- Marengo J, Ambrizzi T (2006) Use of regional climate models in impacts assessments and adaptations studies from continental to regional and local scales: The CREAS (Regional Climate Change Scenarios for South America) initiative in South America. Proceedings of 8 ICSHMO, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, April 24–28, 2006, pp 291–296Google Scholar
- Mearns L (2004) NARCCAP North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program A Multiple AOGCM and RCM Climate Scenario Project over North America. 12/17/2004. AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, USAGoogle Scholar
- Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grbler A, Jung TY, Kram T, La Rovere EL, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Price L, Raihi K, Roehrl A, Rogner H-H, Sankovski A, Schlesinger M, Shukla P, Smith S, Swart R, van Rooijen S, Victor N, Dadi Z (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 599Google Scholar
- Rumelhart DE, Durbin R, Golden R, Chauvin Y (1995) Back-propagation: the basic theory. In: Chauvin Y, Rumelhart DE (eds) Back propagation: theory, architectures, and applications. Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 1–34Google Scholar