Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 100, Issue 3–4, pp 275–282 | Cite as

Changes in El Niño and La Niña teleconnections over North Pacific–America in the global warming simulations

  • Jong-Seong Kug
  • Soon-Il An
  • Yoo-Geun Ham
  • In-Sik Kang
Original Paper


The change in the teleconnections of both El Niño and La Niña over the North Pacific and American regions due to a future greenhouse warming has been analyzed herein by means of diagnostics of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change-Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC-AR4) coupled general circulation models (CGCMs). Among the IPCC-AR4 CGCM simulations, the composites of the eight-member multimodel ensemble are analyzed. In most CGCMs, the tropical Pacific warming due to the increase of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere promotes the main convection centers in the equatorial Pacific associated with both El Niño and La Niña to the east. The eastward shift of the convection center causes a systematic eastward shift of not only El Niño but also La Niña teleconnection patterns over the North Pacific and America, which is demonstrated in the composite maps of 500 hPa circulation, surface temperature, and the precipitation against El Niño and La Niña, as observed in a comparison between the pre-industrial and CO2 doubling experiments. Thus, a systematic eastward migration of convection centers in the tropical Pacific associated with both El Niño and La Niña due to a future global warming commonly causes the eastward shift of the atmospheric teleconnection patterns over the Northern Hemisphere.


Teleconnection Pattern Cold Tongue Greenhouse Warming Multimodel Ensemble Atmospheric Teleconnection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We acknowledge the modeling groups for providing their data for analysis, the Program for Climate model Diagnosis and Intercomparison for collecting and archiving the model output, and the JSC/CLIVAR Working Group on Coupled Modeling for organizing the model data analysis activity. The multimodel data archive is supported by the Office of Science, US Department of Energy. This research was supported by “National Comprehensive Measures against Climate Change” Program by Ministry of Environment, Korea (grant no. 1600-1637-301-210-13), and Brain Korea 21 Project. J.-S. Kug is supported by KORDI (PE98417, PP00720).


  1. An S-I, Jin F-F (2000) An eigen analysis of the interdecadal changes in the structure and frequency of ENSO mode. Geophy Res Lett 27:1573–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An S-I, Wang B (2000) Interdecadal change of the structure of the ENSO mode and its impact on the ENSO frequency. J. Climate 13:2044–2055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. An S-I, Ye Z, Hsieh WW (2006) Changes in the leading ENSO modes associated with the late 1970s climate shift: role of surface zonal current. Geophy Res Lett 33:L14609. doi: 10.1029/2006GL026604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. An S-I, Kug J-S, Timmermann A, Kang I-S, Timm O (2007) The influence of ENSO on the generation of decadal variability in the North Pacific. J Climate 20:667–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. An S-I, Kug J-S, Ham Y-G, Kang I-S (2008) Successive modulation of ENSO to the future greenhouse warming. J Climate 21:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boer GJ, Yu B (2003a) Dynamical aspects of climate sensitivity. Geophys Res Lett 30:1135. doi: 10.1029/2002GL016549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boer GJ, Yu B (2003b) Climate sensitivity and response. Climate Dyn 20:415–429Google Scholar
  8. Boer GJ, Yu B, Kim SJ, Flato GM (2004) Is there observational support for an El Niño-like pattern of future global warming? Geophys Res Lett 31:L06201. doi: 10.1029/2003GL018722 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cane M, Clement AC, Kaplan A, Kushnir Y, Pozdnyakov D, Seager R, Zebiak S, Murtugudde R (1997) Twentieth century sea surface temperature trends. Science 275:957–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins M (2000a) Understanding uncertainties in the response of ENSO to greenhouse warming. Geophy Res Lett 27:3509–3513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins M (2000b) The El Niño–Southern Oscillation in the second Hadley centre coupled model and its response to greenhouse warming. J Climate 13:1299–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cubasch U, Meehl GA, Boer GJ, Stouffer RJ, Dix M, Noda A, Senior CA, Raper S, Yap KS (2001) Projections of future climate change. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden P, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CL (eds) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 525–582Google Scholar
  13. Guilyardi E (2006) El Niño-mean state–seasonal cycle interactions in a multi-model ensemble. Clim Dyn 26:329–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoerling MP, Kumar A, Zhong M (1997) El Niño, La Niña, and the nonlinearity of their teleconnections. J Clim 10:1769–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kang I-S, Kug J-S (2002) El Niño and La Niña sea surface temperature anomalies: asymmetry characteristics associated with their wind stress anomalies. J Geophy Res 107(D19):4372. doi: 10.1029/2001JD000393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knutson TR, Manabe S (1995) Time-mean response over the tropical Pacific due to increased CO2 in a coupled ocean-atmosphere model. J Climate 8:2181–2199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Knutson TR, Manabe S (1998) Model assessment of decadal variability and trends in the tropical Pacific Ocean. J Climate 11:2273–2296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu Z, Vavrus S, He F, Wen N, Zhong Y (2005) Rethinking tropical ocean response to global warming: the enhanced equatorial warming. J Climate 18:4684–4700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meehl GA, Teng H (2007) Multi-model changes in El Niño teleconnections over North America in a future warmer climate. Climate Dyn 29:779–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meehl GA, Washington WM (1996) El Niño-like climate change in a model with increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Nature 382:56–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meehl GA, Teng H, Branstator GW (2006) Future changes of El Niño in two global coupled climate models. Clim Dyn 26:549–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merryfield W (2006) Changes to ENSO under CO2 doubling in a multi-model ensemble. J Clim 19:4009–4027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Müller WA, Roeckner E (2006) ENSO impact on midlatitude circulation patterns in future climate change projections. Geophys Res Lett 33:L05711. doi: 10.1029/2005GL025032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rein B, Lückge A, Sirocko F (2004) A major Holocene ENSO anomaly during the Medieval period. Geophy Res Let 31:L17211. doi: 10.1029/2004GL020161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ropelewski CF, Halpert MS (1987) Global and regional scale precipitation patterns associated with the El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Mon Wea Rev 115:1606–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sterl A, van Oldenborgh GJ, Hazeleger W, Burgers G (2007) On the robustness of ENSO teleconnections. Clim Dyn 29:469–485. doi: 10.1007/s00382-007-0251-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Timmermann A, Oberhuber J, Bacher A, Esch M, Latif M, Roeckner E (1999) Increased El Niño frequency in a climate model forced by future greenhouse warming. Nature 398:694–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vavrus S, Liu Z (2002) Understanding the response of the tropical atmosphere-ocean system to increased CO2 using Equilibrium Asynchronous Coupling. Climate Dyn 19:355–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang B, An S-I (2001) Why the properties of El Niño changed during the late 1970s. Geophy Res Lett 28:3709–3712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yu B, Boer GJ (2002) The roles of radiation and dynamic processes in the El Niño-like response to global warming. Climate Dyn 19:539–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang Y, Wallace JM, Battisti DS (1997) ENSO-like interdecadal variability: 1900–93. J Climate 10:1004–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jong-Seong Kug
    • 1
  • Soon-Il An
    • 2
  • Yoo-Geun Ham
    • 3
  • In-Sik Kang
    • 3
  1. 1.Korea Ocean Research and Development InstituteAnsanSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Atmospheric Sciences/Global Environment LaboratoryYonsei UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.School of Earth and Environmental SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations