Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 99, Issue 1–2, pp 125–138 | Cite as

The influence of topography on single-tower-based carbon flux measurements under unstable conditions: a modeling perspective

Original Paper

Abstract

Based on high-resolution numerical simulations, the influence of topography on the one-dimensional (1-D) tower-based measurements of the net ecosystem–atmosphere exchange rate (NEE) of CO2 was analyzed under unstable conditions. Airflow and transport of a passive scalar were simulated over undulating surfaces covered by tall trees. Compared to their flat surface counterparts, the wind and scalar mixing ratio fields are more disturbed over a steeper surface and/or under a weaker background wind condition, resulting in larger errors in the 1-D NEE estimation. The magnitude of the error is generally larger on the windward side than on the lee side when topography-induced circulation (TIC) does not occur. Applying the ensemble streamline coordinate system to estimating NEE could result in larger errors than applying the local earth coordinate system or terrain coordinate system when the atmospheric flow is significantly distorted. This is especially true when TIC occurs. NEE estimated from the 1-D framework under convective conditions with calm or weak background winds may incur significant errors even over gentle topography. Preference in the selection of a flux tower location is given to the crest area.

References

  1. Arakawa A, Lamb V (1977) Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model, methods in computational physics. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubinet M, Heinesch B, Yernaux M (2003) Horizontal and vertical CO2 advection in a sloping forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 108(3):397–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aubinet M, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Cescatti A, Feigenwinter C, Granier A, Grunwald T, Havrankova K, Heinesch B, Longdoz B, Marcolla B, Montagnani L, Sedlak P (2005) Comparing CO2 storage and advection conditions at night at different carboeuroflux sites. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 116(1):63–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldocchi D, Finnigan J, Wilson K, KT PU, Falge E (2000) On measuring net ecosystem carbon exchange over tall vegetation on complex terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 96(1–2):257–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldocchi D, Falge E, Gu L, Olson R, Hollinger D, Running S, Anthoni P, Bernhofer C, Davis K, Evans R, Fuentes J, Goldstein A, Katul G, Law B, Lee X, Malhi Y, Meyers T, Munger W, Oechel W, Paw KT, Pilegaard K, Schmid HP, Valentini R, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2001) FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82(11):2415–2434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumen W (1990) Atmospheric processes over complex terrain. American Meteorological Society, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown KW, Covey W (1966) The energy-budget evaluation of the micrometeorological transfer processes within a cornfield. Agric For Meteorol 3(1–2):73Google Scholar
  8. Bryan GH (2005) Spurious convective organization in simulated squall lines owing to moist absolutely unstable layers. Mon Wea Rev 133(7):1978–1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryan GH, Fritsch JM (2002) A benchmark simulation for moist nonhydrostatic numerical models. Mon Wea Rev 130(12):2917–2928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryan GH, Wyngaard JC, Fritsch JM (2003) Resolution requirements for the simulation of deep moist convection. Mon Wea Rev 131(10):2394–2416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook BD, Davis KJ, Wang WG, Desai A, Berger BW, Teclaw RM, Martin JG, Bolstad PV, Bakwin PS, Yi CX, Heilman W (2004) Carbon exchange and venting anomalies in an upland deciduous forest in northern Wisconsin, USA. Agric For Meteorol 126(3–4):271–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deardorff JW (1980) Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 18(4):495–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Durran DR, Klemp JB (1983) A compressible model for the simulation of moisture mountain waves. Mon Wea Rev 111:2341–2361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feigenwinter C, Bernhofer C, Vogt R (2004) The influence of advection on the short term CO2 budget in and above a forest canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 113(2):201–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feigenwinter C, Bernhofer C, Eichelmann U, Heinesch B, Hertel M, Janous D, Kolle O, Lagergren F, Lindroth A, Minerbi S, Moderow U, Molder M, Montagnani L, Queck R, Rebmann C, Vestin P, Yernaux M, Zeri M, Ziegler W, Aubinet M (2008) Comparison of horizontal and vertical advective CO2 fluxes at three forest sites. Agric For Meteorol 148(1):12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finnigan JJ (2004a) Advection and modeling. In: XH L et al (eds) Handbook of micrometeorology: a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis. Kluwer Acadamic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  17. Finnigan JJ (2004b) A re-evaluation of long-term flux measurement techniques—part II: coordinate systems. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 113(1):1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finnigan JJ, Clement R, Malhi Y, Leuning R, Cleugh HA (2003) A re-evaluation of long-term flux measurement techniques—part I: averaging and coordinate rotation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 107(1):1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fitzmaurice L, Shaw RH, KT PU, Paton EG (2004) Three-dimensional scalar microfront systems in a large-eddy-simulation of vegetation canpy flow. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112:107–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gopalakrishnan SG, Roy SB, Avissar R (2000) An evaluation of the scale at which topographical features affect the convective boundary layer using large eddy simulations. J Atmos Sci 57:336–351Google Scholar
  21. Goulden ML, Munger JW, Fan SM, Daube BC, Wofsy SC (1996) Measurements of carbon sequestration by long-term eddy covariance: methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy. Glob Change Biol 2(3):169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hammerle A, Haslwanter A, Schmitt M, Bahn M, Tappeiner U, Cernusca A, Wohlfahrt G (2007) Eddy covariance measurements of carbon dioxide, latent and sensible energy fluxes above a meadow on a mountain slope. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122:397–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanna SR, Strimaitis DG (eds) (1990) Rugged terrain effects on diffusion. American Meteorological Society, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  24. Katul G, Finnigan J, Poggi D, Leuning R, Belcher S (2006) The influence of hilly terrain on canopy–atmosphere carbon dioxide exchange. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 118(1):189–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee XH (1998) On micrometeorological observations of surface–air exchange over tall vegetation. Agric For Meteorol 91(1–2):39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Letzel MO, Raasch S (2003) Large eddy simulation of thermally induced oscillations in the convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 60(18):2328–2341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Panin GN, Tetzlaff G, Raabe A (1998) Inhomogeneity of the land surface and problems in the parameterization of surface fluxes in natural conditions. Theor Appl Climatol 60:163–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Patton EG (1997) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow above and within a plant canopy. Ph.D. dissertation, University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  29. Patton EG, Sullivan PP, Moeng C-H (2005) The influence of idealized heterogeneity on wet and dry planetary boundary layers coupled to the land surface. J Atmos Sci 62(7):2078–2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paw U KT, Baldocchi DD, Meyers TP, Wilson KB (2000) Correction of eddy-covariance measurements incorporating both advective effects and density fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 97(3):487–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Prabha T, Karipot A, Binford MW (2007) Characteristics of secondary circulations over an inhomogeneous surface simulated with large-eddy simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123:239–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ (1997) The influence of topography on meteorological variables and surface–atmosphere interactions. J Hydrol 190(3–4):182–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaw RH, Schumann U (1992) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow above and within a forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 61(1):47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shaw RH, Hartog G, Neumann HH (1988) Influence of foliar density and thermal stability on profiles of Reynolds stress and turbulence intensity in a deciduous forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 45(4):391–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Staebler RM, Fitzjarrald DR (2004) Observing subcanopy CO2 advection. Agric For Meteorol 122(3–4):139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sun H, Clark TL, Stull RB, Andrew Black T (2006) Two-dimensional simulation of airflow and carbon dioxide transport over a forested mountain: Part II. Carbon dioxide budget analysis and advection effects. Agric For Meteorol 140(1–4):352–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sun J (2007) Tilt corrections over complex terrain and their implication for CO2 transport. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 124:143–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Valentini R, DeAngelis P, Matteucci G, Monaco R, Dore S, Mugnozza GES (1996) Seasonal net carbon dioxide exchange of a beech forest with the atmosphere. Glob Change Biol 2(3):199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walko RL, Cotton WR, Pielke RA (1992) Large-eddy simulations of the effects of hilly terrain on the convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 58:133–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang W, Davis K (2008) A numerical study of the influence of a clearcut on eddy-covariance flux measurements above a forest. Agric For Meteorol 148:1488–1500. doi:1410.1016/j.agrformet.2008.1405.1009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang W, Davis K, Cook BD, Yi C, Bakwin PS, Butler MP, Ricciuto DM (2005) Surface layer CO2 budget and advective contributions to measurements of net ecosystem-atmosphere exchange of CO2. Agric For Meteorol 135:202–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wood N (2000) Wind flow over complex terrain: a historical perspective and the prospect for large-eddy modelling. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 96(1):11–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yi C (2008) Momentum transfer within canopies. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47:262–275. doi:210.1175/2007JAMC1667.1171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yi C, Davis KJ, Bakwin PS, Berger BW, Marr LC (2000) Influence of advection on measurements of the net ecosystem–atmosphere exchange of CO2 from a very tall tower. J Geophys Res-Atmos 105(D8):9991–9999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yi C, Anderson DE, Turnipseed AA, Burns SP, Sparks J, Stannard D, Monson KR (2008) The contribution of advective fluxes to net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a high-elevation, subalpine forest ecosystem. Eco Appl 18:1379–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yi C, Monson RK, Zhai Z, Anderson DE, Lamb B, Allwine G, Turnipseed AA, Burns SP (2005) Modeling and measuring the nighttime drainage flow in a high-elevation, subalpine forest with complex terrain. J Geophys Res 110(D22):D22303. doi:22310.21029/22005JD006282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IMSG at National Centers for Environmental PredictionNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationCamp SpringsUSA

Personalised recommendations