Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 96, Issue 3–4, pp 209–219

Simulation of extreme precipitation over the Yangtze River Basin using Wakeby distribution

Original Paper


Based on the daily observational precipitation data at 147 stations in the Yangtze River Basin during 1960–2005 and projected daily data of 79 grid cells from the ECHAM5/ MPI-OM model in the 20th and 21st century, time series of precipitation extremes which contain AM (Annual Maximum) and MI (Munger Index) are constructed. The distribution feature of precipitation extremes is analyzed based on the two index series. Three principal results were obtained, as stated in the sequel. (i) In the past half century, the intensity of extreme heavy precipitation and drought events was higher in the mid-lower Yangtze than in the upper Yangtze reaches. Although the ECHAM5 model still can’t capture the precipitation extremes over the Yangtze River Basin satisfactorily, spatial pattern of the observed and the simulated precipitation extremes are much similar to each other. (ii) For quantifying the characteristics of extremely high and extremely low precipitation over the Yangtze River Basin, four probability distributions are used, namely: General Extreme Value (GEV), General Pareto (GPA), General Logistic (GLO), and Wakeby (WAK). It was found that WAK can adequately describe the probability distribution of precipitation extremes calculated from both observational and projected data. (iii) Return period of precipitation extremes show spatially different changes under three greenhouse gas emission scenarios. The 50-year heavy precipitation and drought events from simulated data during 1951–2000 will become more frequent, with return period below 25 years, for the most mid-lower Yangtze region in 2001–2050. The changing character of return periods of precipitation extremes should be taken into account for the hydrological design and future water resources management.


  1. Becker S, Hartmann H, Coulibaly M, Zhang Q, Jiang T (2007) Quasi periodicities of extreme precipitation events in the Yangtze River basin, China. Theoretical Appl Climatol, DOI 10.1007/s00704–007–0357–6, Online First. SpringerLink Date December 27, 2007
  2. Beverly JL, Martell DL (2005) Characterizing extreme fire and weather events in the Boreal Shield ecozone of Ontario. Agric For Meteorol 133:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burger G (2005) Precipitation scenarios for hydrologic climate impact studies. In: Jiang T, King L, Gemmer M, Kundzewicz ZW (eds) Climate change and Yangtze floods. Science Press, Beijing, pp 134–258Google Scholar
  4. Chen YQ, Huang GR, Shao QX, Xu CY (2006) Regional analysis of low flow using L-moments for Dongjiang basin, South China. Hydrol Sci J 51(6):1051–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiew FHS (2006) Estimation of rainfall elasticity of streamflow in Australia. Hydrol Sci J 51(4):613–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fowler HJ, Kilsby CG (2003) A regional frequency analysis of United Kingdom extreme rainfall from 1961–2000. Int J Climatol 23:1313–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Groisman PY, Karl TR, Easterling DR, Knight RW, Jameson PF, Hennessy KJ, Suppiah R, Page CM, Wibig J, Fortuniak K, Razuvaev VN, Douglas A, Forland E, Zhai PM (1999) Changes in the probability of heavy precipitation: important indicators of climatic change. Clim Change 42:243–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hagemann S, Arpe K, Roeckner E (2006) Evaluation of the hydrological cycle in the Echam5 model. J Climate (special section) 19:3810–3827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hosking JRM (1990) L-moments: analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combination of order statistics. J Royal Stat Soc 52(1):105–124Google Scholar
  10. Huff FA, Angel JR (1992) Rainfall frequency atlas of the Midwest. Illinois State Water Survey, Bulletin 71, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  11. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of the Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Iwashima T, Yamamoto R, Sakurai Y (2002) Long-term trends of extremely heavy precipitation intensity in Japan in recent 100 years. Rec Res Devel Meteorol 1:1–9Google Scholar
  13. Karl TR, Knight RW (1998) Secular trends of precipitation amount, frequency and intensity of the United States. Bull Am Meterol Soc 79:223–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katz RW, Parlange MB, Naveau P (2002) Statistics of extremes in hydrology. Adv Water Resour 25:1287–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lambert JH, Matalas NC, Ling CW, Haimes YY, Li D (1994) Selection of probability distribution in characterizing risk of extreme events. Risk Anal 14(5):731–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lana X, Burgueno A, Martinez MD, Serra C (2006) Statistical distribution and sampling strategies for the analysis of extreme dry spell in Catalonia (NE Spain). J Hydrol 324:94–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nguyen VTV, Nguyen TD, Ashkar F (2002) Regional frequency analysis of extreme rainfalls. Water Sci Technol 45:75–81Google Scholar
  18. Palmer TN, Räisänen J (2002) Quantifying the risk of extreme seasonal precipitation events in a changing climate. Nature 415:512–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parida BP (1999) Modelling of Indian summer monsoon rainfall using a four parameter Kappa distribution. Int J Climatol 19:1389–1398Google Scholar
  20. Park JS, Jung HS, Kim RS, Oh JH (2001) Modelling summer extreme rainfall over the Korean Peninsula using Wakeby distribution. Int J Climatol 21:1371–1384Google Scholar
  21. Qian WH, Qin A (2007) Precipitation division and climate shift in China from 1960 to 2000. Theo Appl Climatol, DOI 10.1007/s00704–007–0330–4, Online First. SpringerLink Date Thursday, November 08, 2007
  22. Rao AR, Hamed KH (1994) Frequency analysis of upper Cauvery flood data by L-moments. Water Resour Manage 8:183–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Richard R, Heim JA (2002) A review of twentieth century drought indices used in the United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1149–1165Google Scholar
  24. Sevruk B, Geiger H (1981) Selection of distribution types for extremes of precipitation. World Meteorological Organization, Operational Hydrology Report, 15, WMO-No. 560Google Scholar
  25. Su BD, Xiao B, Zhu DM, Tong J (2005) Rainstorm frequency in the Yangtze River Basin (China): 1960–2002. Hydrol Sci J 50(3):479–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Suppiah R, Hennessy K (1998) Trends in seasonal rainfall, heavy rain days, and number of dry days in Australia 1910–1990. Int J Climatol 18:1141–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xu YL (2005) Analyses on scenario simulations of the 21st century climate change in China. J Nanjing Inst Meterol 28(3):323–328Google Scholar
  28. Yonetani T, Gordon HP (2001) Simulated changes in the frequency of extreme and regional features of seasonal/annual temperature and precipitation when CO2 is doubled. J Clim 14:1765–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yue S, Hashino M (2007) Probability distribution of annual, seasonal and monthly precipitation in Japan. Hydrol Sci J 52(5):863–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Buda Su
    • 1
    • 4
  • Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz
    • 2
    • 3
  • Tong Jiang
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.National Climate CenterChina Meteorological AdministrationBeijingChina
  2. 2.Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchPotsdamGermany
  3. 3.Research Centre for Agricultural and Forest EnvironmentPolish Academy of SciencesPoznańPoland
  4. 4.Nanjing Institute of Geography and LimnologyChinese Academy of SciencesNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations