Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 96, Issue 1–2, pp 145–153

The July urban heat island of Bucharest as derived from modis images

Original Paper


The urban heat island (UHI) of the city of Bucharest (Romania) is analyzed in terms of its extension, geometry, and magnitude using the surface thermal data provided by the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors. An objective method is developed that allows to delineate the UHI. The study focuses on the months of July from the 2000–2006 time interval. The average surface temperatures obtained for each pixel (1 km resolution) were analyzed on cross-profiles that helped us to determine the outline of the UHI. The shifting points identified by the Rodionov test in the temperature series of each profile were considered as possible limits of the UHI. Seemingly, the land cover has a major influence on the extension and the geometry of the Bucharest UHI in July. The magnitude of the heat island was calculated by comparing the average temperature inside its limits and the average temperature of the 5 km (a) and of the 10 km (b) buffers around it. The thermal difference between the UHI and the surrounding area of Bucharest is higher and more variable during the daytime, and is noticeably related to the land cover.


  1. Arnfield AJ (2003) Two decades of urban climate research: a review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island. Int J Climatol 23:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dash P, Göttsche F-M Olesen F-S Fischer H (2002) Land surface temperature and emissivity estimation from passive sensor data: theory and practice–current trends. Int J Rem Sens 23(13):2563–2594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hung T, Uchihama D, Ochi S, Yasuoka Y (2006) Assessment with satellite data of the urban heat island effects in Asian mega cities. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinform 8:34–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jin M, Shepherd JM (2005) Inclusion of urban landscape in a climate model. How can satellite data help? Bull Am Meteorol Soc 86(5):681–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jin M, Dickinson RE, Zhang D (2005) The footprint of urban areas on global climate as characterized by MODIS. J Climate 18:1551–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jin M, Shepherd J M Peters-Lidard C (2007) Development of a parameterization for simulating the urban temperature hazard using satellite observations in climate model. Nat Hazards. DOI 10.1007/s11069–007–9117–2
  7. Landsberg HE (1981) The urban climate. Academic, New York, 275 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu Y, Key JR (2003) Detection and analysis of clear-sky, low-level atmospheric yemperature inversions with MODIS. J Atm Ocean Technol 20:1727–1737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mendelsohn R, Kurukulasuriya P, Basist A, Kogan F, Williams C (2007) Climate analysis with satellite versus weather station data. Climatic Change 81:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Neacşa O, Popovici C (1969) Influence of the urban landscape on some parameters of the air temperature in the city of Bucharest (in Romanian). Institute of Meteorology, Bucharest, pp 293–304Google Scholar
  11. Neacşa O, Popovici, C, Tuinea P, Popa G (1974) Contributions to the climatology of Bucharest (in Romanian). Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology, Bucharest, pp 5–53Google Scholar
  12. Offerle B, Grimmond CSB, Fortuniak K, Pawlak W (2006) Intraurban differences of surface energy fluxes in a central European city. J Appl Meteor Climatol 45:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Oke TR (1973) City size and the urban heat island. Atmos Environ 7:769–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oke TR (1984) Methods in urban climatology. In: Kirchofer W et al (ed) Applied climatology. Zürcher Geogr Schr 14:19–29Google Scholar
  15. Oke TR (1987) Boundary Layer Climates, 2nd edn. Methuen, London, 435 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Pettit AN (1979) A non-parametric approach to the change point problem. Appl Stat 28:126–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pongracz R, Bartholy J, Dezso J (2005) Remotely sensed thermal information applied to urban climate analysis. Adv Space Res 37:2191–2196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rodionov SN (2004) A sequential algorithm for testing climate regime shifts. Geophys Res Lett 31(9), L09204. DOI 10.1029/2004GL019448
  19. Rodionov SN (2005) Detecting regime shifts in the mean and variance: Methods and specific examples. In: V Velikova and N Chipev (eds) Large-scale disturbances (regime shifts) and recovery in aquatic ecosystems: challenges for management toward sustainability. UNESCO-ROSTE/BAS Workshop on Regime Shifts, Varna, Bulgaria, 14–16 June 2005, pp 68–72Google Scholar
  20. Spronken-Smith RA, Oke TR (1998) The thermal regime of urban parks in two cities with different summer climates. Int J Rem Sens 19:2085–2104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Streutker DR (2002) A remote sensing study of the urban heat island of Houston, Texas. Int J Rem Sens 23(13):2595–2608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tumanov S, Stan-Sion A, Lupu A, Soci C, Oprea C (1999) Influences of the city of Bucharest on weather and climate parameters. Atmos Environ 33:4173–4183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Unger J, Sümeghy Z, Zoboki J (2001a) Temperature cross-section features in an urban area. Atmos Res 58:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Unger J, Sümeghy Z, Gulyás Á, Bottyán Z, Mucsi L (2001b) Land-use and meteorological aspects of the urban heat island. Meteorol Appl 8:189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Voogt JA, Oke TR (2003) Thermal remote sensing of urban climates. Rem Sens Environ 86:370–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wan Z, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Li Z-L (2004) Quality assessment and validation of the MODIS global land surface temperature. Int J Rem Sens 25(1):261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ClimatologyNational Meteorological AdministrationBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations