Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 95, Issue 3–4, pp 341–347 | Cite as

Soil temperature spin-up in land surface schemes

Original Paper
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

Land surface schemes used in atmospheric and hydrologic models require the specification of initial soil-temperature profiles. However, detailed soil temperature information is generally unavailable, hence modellers sometimes recur to specifying simplified initial conditions such as vertically constant profiles, assuming that the harmonic heating at the soil surface induces a rapid equilibrium to a steady periodic state. In this paper, using both numerical and analytical approaches, it is shown that such a transition to a steady periodic state is not always very rapid. In particular, it is demonstrated that the characteristic time required to reach equilibrium is highly dependent on the precise timing of initialisation with respect to the cycle of surface heating, and that initialising at the instant coincident with the occurrence of the maximum soil heat flux is the preferred mode.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research described here was carried out in the project “Measuring urban surfaces’ thermal inertia” (MUSTI), which is supported by the PRODEX programme of the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Belgian Science Policy Office. We would also like to acknowledge support from EU COST Action 728 “Enhancing mesoscale meteorological modelling capabilities for air pollution and dispersion applications”.

References

  1. Bender CM, Orszag SA (1984) Advanced mathematical methods for scientists and engineers. McGraw Hill, Auckland, New Zealand, 593 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Bischoff-Gauß I, Kalthoff N, Fiebig-Wittmaack M (2006) The influence of a storage lake in the Arid Elqui Valley in Chile on local climate. Theor Appl Climatol 85. DOI 10.1007/s00704–005–0190–8
  3. Caplan P, Derber J, Gemmill W, Hong SY, Pan HL, Parish D (1997) Changes to the NCEP operational medium-range forecast model analysis/forecast system. Weather Forecast 12:581–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carslaw HS, Jaeger JC (1959) Conduction of heat in solids. Clarendon, Oxford, 510 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng WYY, and Steenburgh WJ (2005) Evaluation of surface sensible weather forecasts by the WRF and the Eta Models over the western United States. Weather Forecast 20:812–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cracknell AP, Xue Y (1996) Thermal inertia determination from space: a tutorial review. Int J Remote Sens 17:431–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dai Y, Zeng X, Dickinson RE, Baker I, Bonan GB, Bosilovich MG, Denning AS, Dirmeyer PA, Houser PR, Niu G-Y, Oleson KW, Schlosser CA, Yang Z-L (2003) The common land model (CLM). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 84:1013–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deardorff JW (1978) Efficient prediction of ground surface temperature and moisture, with an inclusion of a layer of vegetation. J Geophys Res 83:1889–1903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Foy B, Molina LT, Molina MJ (2006) Satellite-derived land surface parameters for mesoscale modelling of the Mexico City basin. Atmos Chem Phys 6:1315–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Ridder K, Gallée H (1998) Land surface-induced regional climate change in southern Israel. J Appl Meteorol 37:1470–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garratt JR (1992) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 316 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Goutorbe J-P, Lebel T, Dolman AJ, Gash JHC, Kabat P, Kerr Y, Montey B, Prince SD, Stricker JMM, Tinga A, Wallace JS (1997) An overview of HAPEX-Sahel: a study in climate and desertification. J Hydrol 189:4–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM (1965) Table of integrals, series, and products. Academic, New York, 1086 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalnay MK, Baker WE (1990) Global numerical weather prediction at the National Meteorological Center. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 71:1410–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lauwaet D, De Ridder K, van Lipzig N (2008) The influence of soil and vegetation parameters on atmospheric variables relevant for convection in the Sahel. J Hydrometeorol (in press)Google Scholar
  16. LeMone MA, Grossman RL, Coulter RL, Wesley ML, Klazura GE, Poulos GS, Blumen W, Lundquist JK, Cuenca RH, Kelly SF, Brandes EA, Oncley SP, McMillen RT, Hicks BB (2000) Land–atmosphere interaction research, early results, and opportunities in the Walnut River watershed in southeast Kansas: CASES and ABLE. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81:757–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lynn BH, Stauffer DR, Muñoz R, Wetzel PJ, Tao W-K, Alpert P, Perlin N, Baker RD, Boone A, Jia Y (2001) Improved simulation of Florida summer convection using the PLACE land model and a 1.5-order turbulence parameterization coupled to the Penn State-NCAR mesoscale model. Mon Weather Rev 129:1441–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maxwell RM, Chow FK, Kollet SJ (2007) The groundwater–land-surface–atmosphere connection: soil moisture effects on the atmospheric boundary layer in fully-coupled simulations. Adv Water Resour 30:2447–2466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mengelkamp H-T, Warrach K, Raschke E (1999) SEWAB: a parameterization of the surface energy and water balance for atmospheric and hydrologic models. Adv Water Resour 23:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mihailovic DT, Lalic B, Arsenic B, Eitzinger J, Dusanic N (2002) Simulation of air temperature inside the canopy by the LAPS surface scheme. Ecol Model 147:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Monteith JL, Unsworth MH (1990) Principles of Environmental Physics, 2nd edn. Arnold, London, 291 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Nagai H (2002) Validation and sensitivity analysis of a new atmosphere-soil-vegetation model. J Appl Meteorol 41:160–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pérez-Landa G, Ciais P, Sanz MJ, Gioli B, Miglietta F, Palau JL, Gangoiti G, Millán MM (2007) Mesoscale circulations over complex terrain in the Valencia coastal region, Spai, part 1: simulation of diurnal circulation regimes. Atmos Chem Phys 7:1835–1849Google Scholar
  24. Pielke RA Sr (2002) Mesoscale meteorological modeling, 2nd edn. Academic, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  25. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in Fortran 77, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 934 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Seneviratne SI, Luthi D, Litschi M, Schar C (2006) Land-atmosphere coupling and climate change in Europe. Nature 443:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thunis P, Cuvelier C (2000) Impact of biogenic emissions on ozone formation in the Mediterranean area: a BEMA modelling study. Atmos Environ 34:467–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhong S, Fast JD, Bian X (1996) Case study of the Great Plains low-level jet using wind profiler network data and a high-resolution mesoscale model. Mon Weather Rev 124:785–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VITO Flemish Institute for Technological ResearchMolBelgium

Personalised recommendations