Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 95, Issue 1–2, pp 39–51 | Cite as

Long-term variations in water balance components for Croatia

  • K. PandžićEmail author
  • D. Trninić
  • T. Likso
  • T. Bošnjak
Article

Summary

In addition to air temperature at 2 m above ground, the following water balance components are considered: precipitation amount, potential and real evapotranspiration, surface runoff, recharge of water into the soil, loss of water from the soil, soil moisture content, and measured river discharge. Monthly air temperature and values of all water balance components (some of calculated using the Palmer method) have been considered for 24 weather stations across Croatia for the period 1951–2000, and for the Zagreb-Grič station for a much longer period, 1862–2000. The Sava River discharge for two hydrological stations (Zagreb and Županja) for the period 1931–2000 has also been used. Twenty-five year moving averages have been calculated from annual mean values and, – for air temperature only, a principal component analysis has been performed. We have found a long-term positive trend in air temperature, and potential and real evapotranspiration; and a negative trend in runoff (discharge) over almost the whole of Croatia, while the moving-average precipitation amounts show cyclical variation. No obvious trend for the recharge of water into the soil and its losses from the soil have been found, however, a negative trend in soil moisture content has been observed. The positive trends in air temperature and potential (real) evapotranspiration and the negative trends in soil moisture content and runoff (discharge) are consistent (to some degree) with recent global climate warming. This fact strengthens the importance of this study.

Keywords

Soil Moisture Content Precipitation Amount Negative Trend Potential Evapotranspiration Water Balance Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burroughs, W 2003Climate into the 21st centuryWorld Meteorological OrganisationGeneva240Google Scholar
  2. Eagleman, JR 1967Pan evaporation, potential and actual evapotranspirationJ Appl Meteor6482488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. IPCC (2007) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report on climate change. 10-th Session of Working Group I of the IPCC, Paris, February 2007 (www.ipcc.ch)
  4. Lozan, JLGrassl, HHupfer, P eds. 2001Climate of the 21st century – changes and risksWissenschaf tliche Auswertungen & GEOHamburg448Google Scholar
  5. Moberg, A, Alexandersson, H 1997Homogenization of Swedish temperature data. Part II: Homogenized gridded air temperature compared with a subset of global gridded air temperature since 1861Int J Climatol173554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Oke, TR 1987Boundary layer climatesMethuenLondon435Google Scholar
  7. Palmer CW (1965) Meteorological drought. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, Research Paper No. 45, 58 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Pandžić, K 1985Water balance on the Eastern Adriatic coastal regionPapers (Zagreb)202129Google Scholar
  9. Pandžić, K 1986Factor analysis of temperature field on a relatively small areaIdojaras90321331Google Scholar
  10. Pandžić, K 1988Principal component analysis of precipitation in the Adriatic-Pannonian area of YugoslaviaJ Climatol8357370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pandžić, K, Kisegi, M 1990Principal component analysis of a local temperature field within the global circulationTheor Appl Climatol41177300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pandžić, K, Trninić, D 1998The relationship between the Sava River basin annual precipitation, its discharge and large-scale atmospheric circulationTheor Appl Climatol616976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pandžić, K, Šimunić, I, Tomić, F, Husnjak, S, Likso, T, Petošić, D 2006Comparison of three mathematical models for the estimation of 10-day drain dischargeTheor Appl Climatol85107115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Penzar, B 1976Drought indices for Zagreb and their statistical forecast (in Croatian)Papers and Presentations (Zagreb)13158Google Scholar
  15. Penzar, B, Penzar, I, Juras, J, Marki, A 1992Brief review of the climatic fluctuations recorded in Zagreb between 1862 and 1990Geofizika95767Google Scholar
  16. Preisendorfer, RW 1988Principal component analysis in meteorology and oceanographyElsvierAmsterdam425Google Scholar
  17. Rimbu, N, Boroneant, C, Buta, C, Dima, M 2002Decadal variability of the Danube river flow in the lower basin and its relation with the North Atlantic OscillationInt J Climatol2211691179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thornthwaite, CW 1948An approach toward a rational classification of climateGeogr Rev385594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilks, DS 2006Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciencesElsevierAmsterdam627Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Pandžić
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. Trninić
    • 1
  • T. Likso
    • 1
  • T. Bošnjak
    • 1
  1. 1.Meteorological and Hydrological ServiceZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations