Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 94, Issue 3–4, pp 225–239 | Cite as

A comparison of temperature inversion statistics at a coastal and a non-coastal location influenced by the same synoptic regime

  • A. E. MilionisEmail author
  • T. D. Davies


The primary aim of this work is to examine to what extent the climatology of atmospheric temperature inversions at one location is site specific, and to what extent it reflects a wider area for which the same synoptic conditions can be assumed. To this end radiosonde data from a coastal and a non-coastal location in eastern England separated by 210 km and influenced by the same synoptic conditions are used. Analysis of these data shows that there is a pronounced difference between the inversion climatologies at the two sites. The vertical distribution of base-heights of inversions has a very distinct maximum at a height of about 200 m at the location proximate to the coast. This maximum is not present at the inland location, and the difference is due to both sea-breezes and advection from the sea due to synoptic-scale wind field. Examining the vertical distributions of base-heights of inversions at the two locations under conditions that either maximize or minimize the effect of sea-breeze it is found that the differences in the two distributions are to a certain extent deterministic (therefore predictable) rather than random, as the dominant mechanisms which are responsible for these differences (diurnal and yearly cycles) have an obvious regularity. Using standard statistical methods it is further shown that, apart from this difference, nearly all other inversion statistics for the two locations are similar when the atmospheric layer from surface to 700 hPa is taken into consideration. However, when only the first inversion in each temperature profile is considered, the inversions activity throughout the year, defined with the aid of an index, in the two locations is not correlated, indicating that for the lowest part of the surface-700 hPa region, local factors overwhelm the synoptic conditions. Thus, these results provide evidence that the inversion climatology at one location can be generalised over a wider area where the same synoptic regime can be assumed. Given that, at least to an extent, any differences in the characteristics of inversions due to local factors can be inferred once the underlying mechanisms are carefully studied, this work has also important implications for micrometeorological studies as for instance the local diffusion and transport of air pollutans.


Inversion Layer Temperature Inversion Weather Type Synoptic Condition Perature Inversion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdul-Wahal, SA, Al-Saifi, SY, Alrumhi, BA, Abdulraheem, MY, Al-Uraimi, M 2004Determination of the features of low-level temperature inversions above a suburban site in Oman using radiosonde measurements: long term analysisJ Geophys Res109D20101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fisher, RA 1966The design of experiments8Hafner Publishing CompanyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Hosler, CR 1961Low level inversion frequency in the contiguous United StatesMon Wea Rev59319339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hsu, JC 1996Multiple comparisons: theory and methodsChapman HallNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Janhall, S, Olofson, KFG, Andersson, PU, Pettersson, JBC, Hallquist, M 2006Evolution of the urban aerosol during winter temperature inversion episodesAtmos Environ4053555366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jenkinson AF, Collison FP (1977) An initial climatology of gales over the North Sea. Synoptic Climatology Branch Memorandum No. 62, Meteorological Office, BracknellGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones, PD, Kelly, PM 1982Principal component analysis of the Lamb catalogue of daily weather types: Part 1. Annual frequenciesJ Climatol2147157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones, PD, Hulme, M, Briffa, KR 1993A comparison of Lamb circulation types with an objective classification schemeInt J Climatol13655663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kassomenos, PA, Koletsis, IG 2005Seasonal variation of the temperature inversions over Athens, GreeceInt J Climatol2516511663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kerminen, V, Pakkanen, TA, Makela, T, Hillamo, RE, Sillanpaa, M, Ronkko, T, Virtanen, A, Keskinen, J, Pirjila, L, Hussein, T, Hameri, K 2007Development of particle number size distribution near a major road in Helsinki during an episodic inversion situationAtmos Environ4117591767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kukkonen, J, Pohjola, M, Sokhi, RS, Luhana, L, Kitwiroom, N, Fragkou, L, Rantamaki, M, Berge, E, Odegaard, V, Slordal, LH, Denby, B, Finadri, S 2005Analysis and evaluation of selected local-scale PM10 air pollution episodes in four European cities: Helsinki, London, Milan and OsloAtmos Environ3927592773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lamb HH (1972) British isles weather types and a register of the daily sequence of circulation patterns, 1981–1971. Geophys Mem No 116, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Malek, E, Davis, T, Martin, RS, Silva, PJ 2006Meteorological and environmental aspects of one of the worst national air pollution episodes (January, 2004) in Logan, Cache Valley, Utah, USAtm Res79108122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Milionis, AE, Davies, TD 1992A five year climatology of elevated inversions at Hemsby (U.K.)Int J Climatol12205215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Milionis, AE, Davies, TD 1994aBox-Jenkins univariate modelling for climatological time series analysis: an application to the monthly activity of temperature inversionsInt J Climatol14569579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Milionis, AE, Davies, TD 1994bRegression and stochastic models for air pollution – II: Application of stochastic models to examine the links between ground-level smoke concentrations and temperature inversionsAtmos Environ2828112822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Milionis, AE, Davies, TD 2002Associations between atmospheric temperature inversions and vertical wind profiles: a preliminary assessmentMeteorol Appl9223228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Milionis AE, Davies TD (2007) The effect of the prevailing weather on the activity of atmospheric temperature inversions. Int J Climatol (accepted)Google Scholar
  19. Montgomery, DC 2000Design and analysis of experiments5WileyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Nodzu, MI, Ogino, S, Tachibana, Y, Yamanaka, MD 2006Climatological description of seasonal variations in lower tropospheric temperature inversions layers over the Indochina PeninsulaJ Clim1933073319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Preston-Whyte, RA, Diab, RD, Tyson, PD 1976Towards an inversion climatology of Southern Africa: Part II. Non-surface inversions in the lower atmosphereS Afr Geogr J594559Google Scholar
  22. Prezerakos, NG 1998Lower tropospheric structure and synoptic scale circulation patterns during prolonged temperature inversions over Athens, GreeceTheor Appl Climatol606376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Riordan, AJ, Davis, JM, Kiess, RB 1986The morning inversion near the ground and its daytime transition at two rural sites in the CarolinasJ Clim A Meteorol25239256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sivaramakriushnan, MV, Mokashi, RY, Parameswaran, NV 1972Temperature inversions and stable layers near ground over IndiaInd J Meteorol Geophys23367378Google Scholar
  25. Spiegel, MR 1988Schaum’s Outline of theory and problems of statistics2McGraw-HillNewYorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Tyson, PD, Preston-Whyte, RA, Diab, RD 1976Towards an inversion climatology of Southern Africa: Part 1. Surface inversionsS Afr Geogr J58151163Google Scholar
  27. World Meteorological Organization (1975) Upper air sounding studies. WMO Technical Note No 140. World Meteorological Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  28. World Meteorological Organization (1983) Guide to meteorological instruments and methods of observation, 5th edn. WMO-No. 8 World Meteorological Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  29. Zannetti, P 1990Air pollution modellingVan Nostrand ReinholdNew YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Statistics and Actuarial Financial MathematicsUniversity of the AegeanKarlovasiGreece
  2. 2.School of Environmental Sciences, University of East AngliaNorwichU.K.

Personalised recommendations