Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 90, Issue 3–4, pp 263–274 | Cite as

Using aridity indices to describe some climate and soil features in Eastern Europe: a Romanian case study

  • C. Paltineanu
  • I. F. Mihailescu
  • I. Seceleanu
  • C. Dragota
  • F. Vasenciuc


As a result of climatic change associated with global warming, aridity is an increasing problem in many parts of the world, including south-eastern and southern regions of Romania. This paper clarifies the concept of aridity, and discusses related concepts including indices of aridity, and their influence on some landscape and soil features including climatic water deficit (WD) and the depth to soil carbonates (DC). As used here, WD is calculated as the difference between precipitation sum (P) and the Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration sum (ETo-PM) over certain periods. Another three well-known aridity indices are also considered: De Martonne’s index (Iar-DM), Thornthwaite’s index (Iar-TH), the UNESCO (1979) P/ETo-PM ratio index (Iar-P/ETo-PM). WD is as high as −450 mm during the growing season in the most arid, south-eastern and southern regions of Romania, especially in the Dobrogea and Baragan areas. In other regions of Romania, including most of the plains and plateaus where agriculture is an important branch of the economy, WD reaches −100 to −300 mm during the growing season. The above aridity indices were spatially interpolated for specific periods by kriging, to generate relatively homogeneous areas. WD can also be seen as an aridity index which has the advantage of a more accurate quantification of the water supply needed for a reference crop, e.g. grass under standardised conditions, for various geographical regions. WD is significantly correlated with the other aridity indexes and with DC. This paper also examines the risk of aridity spreading, and suggests improvements to the water management system for agriculture in Romania.


Kriging Romania Arid Region Standardise Precipitation Index Aridity Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aïvazian, S 1970Étude statistique des dépendancesEdition MirMoscou236Google Scholar
  2. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Rome, 301 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Apetroaiei, S 1977Evaluarea si prognoza bilantului apei in solEditura CeresBucuresti160Google Scholar
  4. Berbecel, O, Stancu, M, Ciovica, N, Jianu, V, Apetroaei, S, Socor, E, Rogodjan, I, Eftimescu, M 1970AgrometeorologiaEditura CeresBucuresti93117Google Scholar
  5. Botzan, M 1972Bilantul apei in solurile irigateEditura Academiei RSRBucurestiGoogle Scholar
  6. Canarache A (1990) Fizica solurilor agricole. Editura Ceres, 268 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Canarache A (2004) Indicatori climatici si regimuri de umiditate si temperatura a solului. Stiinta Solului, Seria III, SNRSS, No. 1–2, vol. XXXVIII, pp 66–78Google Scholar
  8. Canarache A, Dumitru S (2002) Impact of soil/land properties on the effects of drought and on soil rating. In: Proceedings, Central and Eastern European Workshop on Drought Mitigation, 12–15th of April, 2000, Budapest-Felsögöd, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  9. Cernescu, N 1961Opere aleseEditura StiintificaBucuresti250Google Scholar
  10. Conea, A, Florea, N, Puiu, S 1980Sistemul Român de Clasificarea solurilorResearch Institute for Soil Science and AgrochemistryBucharest173Google Scholar
  11. Cressie, NAC 1990The origins of KrigingMathematical Geology22239252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Martonne E (1926) Une nouvelle fonction climatologique: L’ indice d’aridité. La Meteorologie: 449–458Google Scholar
  13. Deutsch, CV, Journel, AG 1992GSLIB – Geostatistical Software Library and User’s GuideOxford University PressNew York338Google Scholar
  14. Donciu C, Gogorici E (1973) Regimul termic al solurilor din zonele agricole ale Romaniei. IMH Bucharest, 146 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1977) Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 24, FAO Rome, Italy, 156 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Florea N, Munteanu I (2000) Romanian system of soil taxonomy. Editura Universitatii Al. I. Cuza, Iassy, 107 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Florea, N, Munteanu, I, Rapaport, C, Chitu, C, Opris, M 1968Geografia solurilor RomanieiEditura StiintificaBucharest325Google Scholar
  18. Jensen ME, Burman RD, Allen RG (eds) (1990) Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASCE Manual 70, New York, NY, 332 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Köppen, WP 1931Grundriss der Klimakunde2Walter de GruyterBerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Marica, AC, Busuioc, A 2004The potential of climate change on the main components of water balance relating to maize cropRomanian J Meteor65057Google Scholar
  21. McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In: 8th Conference on Applied Climatology. Amer Meteor Soc Boston, pp 179–184Google Scholar
  22. Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and the environment. In: The state and movement of water in living organisms. XIXth Symposium Soc. for Exp. Biol., Swansea, Cambridge University Press, pp 205–234Google Scholar
  23. Paltineanu Cr, Chitu E (2001) Comparatia dintre evapotranspiratia de referinta estimata prin metoda Penman- Monteith si alte metode indirecte la Pitesti-Maracineni. Lucrarile stiintifice ale Institutului de Cercetare si Productie pentru Pomicultura Pitesti-Maracineni, Vol. XX, Editura Caligraf, Pitesti, pp 124–132Google Scholar
  24. Paltineanu Cr, Mihailescu IF, Seceleanu I (2000a) Dobrogea, conditiile pedoclimatice, consumul si necesarul apei de irigatie ale principalelor culturi agricole. Editura Ex Ponto, Constanta, 258 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Paltineanu, Cr, Chitu, E, Tanasescu, N, Apostol, G, Pufu, MN 2000bIrrigation water requirements for some fruit trees specific to the Arges-Vedea river basin, Romania, Proceedings of the third International Symposium on Irrigation of Horticultural Crops, Lisboa, PortugalActa Horticulturae537113119Google Scholar
  26. Paltineanu Cr, Mihailescu IF, Prefac Z, Popescu M (2006) Stabilitatea temporala a temperaturii medii si corelarea acesteia intre statiile meteorologice din Romania. Conferinta anuala de comunicari a Facultatii de Geografie din Universitatea Spiru Haret, Bucharest, Romania (in press)Google Scholar
  27. Schwartz P, Randall D (2003) An abrupt climate change scenario and its implications for United States National Security, p 22.
  28. Smith M (1992) CROPWAT-A computer program for irrigation planning and management. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 46, Rome, 126 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Teaci, D 1980Bonitarea tereburilor agricoleEditura CeresBucharest296Google Scholar
  30. Thornthwaite, CW 1948An approach toward a rational classification of climateThe Geographical Rev385594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. *Clima RSR, Vol. II, Date climatologice (1966) Comitetul de Stat al Apelor de pe langa Consiliul de Ministri, Institutul Meteorologic, Bucuresti, 277 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. *FAO, ISRIC (1998) World reference Base for Soil resources. World soil Res., Rome, 88 ppGoogle Scholar
  33. *Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil Taxonomy – A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. USDA-SCS. Agric. Handbook 436Google Scholar
  34. *Surfer 8 Program, Surface Mapping System, Golden Software Inc. 2002,
  35. *UNESCO (1979) Map of the world distribution of arid regions: Explanatory note. MAP Technical Notes 7. UNESCO, Paris, 54 pp + mapGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Paltineanu
    • 1
  • I. F. Mihailescu
    • 2
  • I. Seceleanu
    • 3
  • C. Dragota
    • 4
  • F. Vasenciuc
    • 4
  1. 1.Research Institute for Fruit Growing, Pitesti–MaracineniDistrict ArgesRomania
  2. 2.Ovidius UniversityConstantaRomania
  3. 3.Research Institute of Soil ScienceAgrochemistry and Environmental ProtectionBucharestRomania
  4. 4.National Meteorological AdministrationBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations