Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 91, Issue 1–4, pp 35–50 | Cite as

Quantifying spatial patterns of bioclimatic zones and controls in Turkey

  • F. Evrendilek
  • S. Berberoglu
Article

Summary

The study was aimed at inferring spatial patterns of climatic zones as well as identifying significant discriminating bioclimatic controls for distribution of major ecosystems in Turkey, based on multivariate analyses. A total of 12 climate variables and 11 bioclimatic indices for the period of 1968–2004 at 272 meteorological stations, and four location data (latitudes, longitudes, altitudes, and distance to sea) were analyzed using discriminant analysis (DA), hierarchical and non-hierarchical cluster analyses (CA), principal components analysis (PCA), and multiple linear regression (MLR) models. The first three and four linear discriminant functions (LDFs) explained 88 and 95% of the variation in the dataset, respectively. The efficacy of the discriminant model was high (85.5%) based on the cross-validation method. The hierarchical and non-hierarchical CA pointed to seven clusters (climate types) that can be observed on the basis of broad climatic similarity of 97%. PCA elucidated 78% of variation in the dataset. MLR models that accounted for variations in the 12 climatic response variables as a function of the four location variables and aspect had R 2 values ranging from 28.8% for precipitation to 89.8% for mean air temperature and soil temperature for a depth of 5 cm. The multivariate analyses indicated that the meteorological stations are heterogeneous clusters consisting of the seven climatic zones. However, differences in the bioclimatic variables at the boundaries complicate the natural clustering scheme of a multidimensional cloud of data points and were detected in a climatologically plausible manner by the Ward and K-means CA, and PCA. Our multivariate approach revealed that the commonly used climatic zones are insufficient representations of the inferred climatic zones: (1) the coastal Black Sea; (2) the inland Black Sea; (3) the southeastern Anatolia; (4) the eastern Anatolia; (5) the central Anatolia; (6) the Mediterranean; and (7) the Aegean.

Keywords

Turkey Multiple Linear Regression Model Linear Discriminant Function Bioclimatic Variable Grow Season Precipitation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Box, EO 1981Macroclimate and plant forms: an introduction to predictive modeling in phytogeographyDr W. Junk PublishersThe HagueGoogle Scholar
  2. Claussen, M, Esch, M 1994Biomes computed from simulated climatologiesClim Dynam9235243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Evrendilek, F, Wali, MK 2004Changing global climate: historical carbon and nitrogen budgets and projected responses of Ohio’s cropland ecosystemsEcosystems7381392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Feddema, JJ, Oleson, KW, Bonan, GB, Mearns, LO, Buja, LE, Meehl, GA, Washington, WM 2005The importance of land-cover change in simulating future climatesScience31016741678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gerstengarbe, F-W, Werner, PC, Fraedrich, K 1999Applying non-hierarchical cluster analysis algorithms to climate classification: some problems and their solutionTheor Appl Climatol64143150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gosz, JR 1993Ecotone hierarchiesEcol Appl3369376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gosz, JR, Sharpe, PJH 1989Broadscale concepts for interactions of climate, topography, and biota at biome transitionsLandscape Ecol3229243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holdridge, L 1967Life zone ecologyTropical Science CenterSan Jose, Costa RicaGoogle Scholar
  9. Holdridge, LR 1947Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic dataScience105367368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Isachenko, AG 1973Principles of landscape science and physicalgeographic regionalizationMelbourne University PressCarlton, Victoria, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  11. Köppen, W 1931Grundriss der KlimakundeWalter de Gruyter Co.BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. Krajina, VJ 1965Biogeoclimatic zones and biogeocoenoses of British ColumbiaEcol West N Amer1117Google Scholar
  13. Neilson, RP 1993Transient ecotone response to climatic change: some conceptual and modelling approachesEcol Appl3385395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pielke, R, Avissar, R, Raupach, M, Dolman, AJ, Zhen, X, Denning, AS 1998Interactions between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems: influence on weather and climateGlob Change Biol4461475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Post, WM, Emanuel, WR, Zinke, PJ, Stangenberger, AG 1982Soil carbon pools and world life zonesNature298156159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Potter, CS, Klooster, SA 1999Dynamic global vegetation modelling for predicting of plant functional types and biogenic trace gas fluxesGlobal Ecol Biogeogr8473488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prentice, IC, Cramer, W, Harrison, SP, Leemans, R, Monserud, RA, Solomon, AM 1992A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climateJ Biogeogr19117134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thornthwaite, CW 1948An approach towards a rational classification of climateGeogr Rev385594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Trewartha, GT 1943An introduction to weather and climate2McGraw-HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Troll, C 1971Landscape ecology (geoecology) and biogeocenology – terminology studyGeoforum84346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Unal, Y, Kindap, T, Karaca, M 2003Redefining the climate zones of Turkey using cluster analysisInt J Climatol2310451055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wali, MK, Evrendilek, F, West, T, Watts, S, Pant, D, Gibbs, H, McClead, B 1999Assessing terrestrial ecosystem sustainability: usefulness of carbon and nitrogen modelsNature Resour352033Google Scholar
  23. Walter, H, Box, E 1976Global classification of natural terrestrial ecosystemsVegetatio327581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Woodward, FI, Lomas, MR, Kelly, CK 2004Global climate and the distribution of plant biomesPhilos T Roy Soc359B14651476CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Evrendilek
    • 1
  • S. Berberoglu
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and ArchitectureAbant Izzet Baysal UniversityBoluTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Landscape ArchitectureCukurova UniversityBalcali-AdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations