Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 84, Issue 1–3, pp 69–76 | Cite as

Progress toward sustainable settlements: a role for urban climatology

  • Mills G.
Article

Summary

Sustainable development can be defined as that which meets the needs of the current generation while leaving sufficient resources for the needs of future generations. A central objective is to decouple conventional resource use (and its corollary, waste generation) from economic development through technological innovation, improved efficiency and changes in individual practices. As the global population becomes urbanized and human activity is concentrated in urban areas, settlement planning is a key aspect of sustainability. The widespread inclusion of environmental objectives in urban plans at all scales provides an opportunity for the incorporation of urban climate knowledge into the planning process on a routine basis. Many of the stated objectives have both direct and indirect connections to climate. However, for this to happen, climate research and results must be linked more explicitly to the objectives of the sustainable settlement. In this paper, the relevance of sustainability to urban design and climate is discussed and the potential contribution of current urban climatology is assessed, identifying areas of special consideration for transfer to achieve sustainable urban planning and design.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed, KS 2002Comfort in urban spaces: defining the boundaries of outdoor thermal comfort for the tropical urban environments.Energ Buildings35103110Google Scholar
  2. Bitan, A 1990/91Bet She’an Master Plan – Climatic rehabilitation of an ancient historic city.Energ Buildings15–162333Google Scholar
  3. Bottema, M 1999Towards rules of thumb for wind comfort and air quality.Atmos Environ3340094017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown RD, Gillespie TJ (1995) Microclimatic landscape design. New York: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckland, AT, Middleton, DR 1999Nomograms for calculating pollution within street canyons.Atmos Environ3310171036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, S 1996Green cities, growing cities, just cities: urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development.J Am Plann Assoc62296312Google Scholar
  7. Capeluto, IG, Yezioro, A, Shaviv, E 2003Climatic aspects in urban design – a case study.Build Environ38827835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cook, J 1996Architecture indigenous to extreme climates.Energ Buildings23277291Google Scholar
  9. de Paul, FT, Sheih, CM 1986Measurements of wind velocities in a street canyon.Atmos Environ20455459Google Scholar
  10. de Schiller, S, Evans, JM 1998Sustainable urban development: design guidelines for warm, humid cities.Urban Design International4165184Google Scholar
  11. Emmanuel, R 1995Energy-efficient urban design guidelines for warm-humid cities: strategies for Colombo, Sri Lanka.J Archit Plan Res125879Google Scholar
  12. Girardet H (1999) Sustainable cities: a contradiction in terms? In: Satterthwaite D (ed) Sustainable cities. London: Earthscan, pp 413–425Google Scholar
  13. Golany, GS 1995Urban design morphology and thermal performance.Atmos Environ30455465Google Scholar
  14. Haughton, G 1997Developing sustainable urban development models.Cities14189195Google Scholar
  15. Höppe, P 2002Different aspects of assessing indoor and outdoor thermal comfort.Energ Buildings34661665Google Scholar
  16. Kenworthy, JR, Laube, FB 1996Automobile dependence in cities: an international comparison of urban transport and land use patterns with implications for sustainability.Environ Impact Asses16279308Google Scholar
  17. Knowles, RL 2002The solar envelope: its meaning for energy and buildings.Energ Buildings351525Google Scholar
  18. Lazar, R, Podesser, A 1999An urban climate analysis of Graz and its significance fro urban planning in the tributary valleys east of Graz (Austria).Atmos Environ3341954209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Littlefair, P 1998Passive solar urban design: ensuring the penetration of solar energy into the city.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews2303326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lyons, TJ, Kenworthy, JR, Moy, C, dos Santos, F 2003An international urban pollution model for the transportation sector.Transport Research Part D8159167Google Scholar
  21. Newman P (1999) Transport: reducing automobile dependence. In: Satterthwaite D (ed) Sustainable cities. London: Earthscan, pp 173–198Google Scholar
  22. Oke, TR 1984Towards a prescription for the greater use of climatic priciples in settlement planning.Energ Buildings7110Google Scholar
  23. Oke TR (1987) Boundary layer climates, 2nd edn. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Oke, TR 1988Street design and the urban canopy layer climate.Energ Buildings11103113Google Scholar
  25. Rabinovitch, J, Leitman, J 1996Urban planning in Curitiba.Sci Am2744653Google Scholar
  26. Rees, W, Wackernagel, M 1996Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable – and why they are a key to sustainability.Environ Impact Asses16223248Google Scholar
  27. Rogers R (1997) Cities for a small planet. London: Faber and FaberGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosenfeld, AH, Akbari, H, Bretz, S, Fishman, BL, Kurn, DM, Sailor, D, Taha, H 1995Mitigation of urban heat islands: materials, utility programs, updates.Energ Buildings22255265Google Scholar
  29. Small C (2001) Global analysis of urban population distributions and the physical environment. In: Proceedings of the Open Meeting of the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community. Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  30. Soligo, MJ, Irwin, PA, Williams, CJ, Schuyler, GD 1998A comprehensive assessment of pedestrian comfort including thermal effects.J Wind Eng Ind Aerod77–78753766Google Scholar
  31. Steemers, K, Baker, N, Crowther, D, Dubiel, J, Nikolopoulou, M-H, Ratti, C 1997City texture and microclimate.Urban Design Studies32550Google Scholar
  32. Steemers, K 2003Energy and the city: density, buildings and transport.Energ Buildings35314Google Scholar
  33. The Urban Task Force (1999) Towards and urban renaissance. London: E&FN SponGoogle Scholar
  34. Thormark, C 2002A low energy building in a life cycle – its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential.Build Environ37429435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. U.N. (2001) The state of the world’s cities, 2001. United Nations Centre for urban settlements, Nairobi: KenyaGoogle Scholar
  36. Zrudlo, LR 1988A climatic approach to town planning in the Arctic.Energ Buildings114163Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mills G.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity College DublinIreland

Personalised recommendations