Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 84, Issue 1–3, pp 35–45 | Cite as

Urban surface modeling and the meso-scale impact of cities

  • V. Masson
Article

Summary

New developments of the international community in modeling the urban canopy surface energy balance are presented and classified into five main categories: (i) models statistically fit to observations, (ii) and (iii) modified vegetation schemes with or without drag terms in the canopy, and (iv) and (v), new urban canopy schemes, that present both horizontal and vertical surfaces, again with or without a drag approach. The advantages and disadvantages of each type of model are explained. In general, the more the physics are correctly simulated, the more complex are the urban phenomenon that can be addressed, on the other hand however, the more consuming of computer-time and difficult to couple with atmospheric models the scheme becomes.

Present use of these new models in meso-scale atmospheric models show their ability to reproduce the phenomenon of the urban heat island (UHI) and some of its consequences – urban breezes, storm initiation, interaction with sea-breeze. Their use opens up new perspectives, for example in the mitigation of the UHI, or assessment of the role of air-conditioning systems or the impact of urban dynamics on air pollution.

However, there is need to validate further the different urban models available. In particular it is necessary to compare model output with urban surface energy balance measurements. An intercomparison exercise involving these urban schemes is suggested as an efficient way to assess and improve these models.

Keywords

Urban Heat Island Surface Energy Balance Urban Surface Urban Canopy Urban Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnfield, AJ 1982An approach to the estimation of the surface radiative properties and radiation budgets of cities.Phys Geog397122Google Scholar
  2. Arnfield, AJ 2003Two decades of urban climate research: a review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island.Int J Climatol23126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnfield, AJ, Grimmond, CSB 1998An urban energy budget model and its application to urban storage heat flux modeling.Energy and Build276168Google Scholar
  4. Ashie, Y, Ca, VT, Asaeda, T 1999Building canopy model for the analysis of urban climate.J Wind Engineering81237248Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, BW 2003Numerical modelling of urban heat-island intensity.Bound-Layer Meteorol109285310Google Scholar
  6. Baik, JJ, Kim, YH, Chun, HY 2001Dry and moist convection forced by an urban heat island.J Appl Meteor4014621475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barlow, JF, Belcher, SE 2002A wind tunnel model for quantifying fluxes in the urban boundary layer.Bound-Layer Meteorol104131150Google Scholar
  8. Best, MJ 1998A model to predict surface temperatures.Bound-Layer Meteorol88279306Google Scholar
  9. Bornstein, R, Lin, Q 2000Urban heat islands and summertime convective thunderstorms in Atlanta: three case studies.Atmos Environ34507516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bottema, M 1997Urban roughness modelling in relation to pollutant dispersion.Atmos Environ3130593075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown MJ (2000) Urban parameterizations for mesoscale meteorological models. In: Boybeyi Z (ed) (193–255). Mesoscale atmospheric dispersion. Wessex Press, 448 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Changnon, SA 1978METROMEX issue.J Appl Meteor17565716Google Scholar
  13. Cros, B, Durand, P, Frejafon, E, Kottmeer, C, Perros, P-E, Peuch, V-H, Ponche, J-L, Robin, D, Saïd, F, Toupance, G, Wortham, H 2003The ESCOMPTE Program: an overview.Atmos Res69241279Google Scholar
  14. Dupont, S, Otte, TL, Ching, JKS 2004Simulation of meteorological fields within and above urban and rural canopies with a mesoscale model (MM5).Bound-Layer Meteorol113111158Google Scholar
  15. Grimmond, CSB, Oke, TR 2002Turbulent heat fluxes in urban areas: Observations & local-scale urban meteorological parameterization scheme (LUMPS).J Appl Meteor41792810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grimmond, CSB, Souch, C 1994Surface description for urban climate studies: a gis based methodology.Geocarto International14760Google Scholar
  17. Grimmond, CSB, Cleugh, HA, Oke, TR 1991An objective urban heat storage model and its comparison with other schemes.Atmos Environ25B311326Google Scholar
  18. Grimmond, CSB, Oke, TR 1986Urban water balance. 2. results from a suburb of Vancouver, British Columbia.Water Resour Res2214041412Google Scholar
  19. Grimmond, CSB, Oke, TR 1991An evapotranspiration-interception model for urban areas.Water Resour Res2717391755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grimmond, CSB, Oke, TR 1999aHeat storage in urban areas: local-scale observations and evaluation of a simple model.J Appl Meteor38922940Google Scholar
  21. Grimmond, CSB, Oke, TR 1999bAerodynamic properties of urban areas derived from analysis of surface form.J Appl Meteor3812621292Google Scholar
  22. Grimmond, CSB, King, TS, Roth, M, Oke, TR 1998Aerodynamic roughness of urban areas derived from wind observations.Bound-Layer Meteor89124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grimmond, CSB, Oke, TR, Steyn, DG 1986Urban water balance. 1. A model for daily totals.Water Resour Res2213971403Google Scholar
  24. Hémon D, Jougla E (2003) Estimation de la surmortalité et principales caractéristiques épidémiologiques. Technical report, INSERM (in French)Google Scholar
  25. Ichinose, T, Shimodozono, K, Hanaki, K 1999Impact of anthropogenic heat on urban climate in Tokyo.Atmos Environ3338973909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klemm O (1995) Transport and distribution of air pollutants in Athens (Greece). In: Moussiopoulos N et al (ed) Aircraft measurements during MEDCAPHOT-TRACEGoogle Scholar
  27. Kondo, H 1990A numerical experiment of the “extended sea breeze” over the Kanto plain.J Meteor Soc Japan68419433Google Scholar
  28. Kondo, H 1995The thermally induced local wind and surface inversion over the Kanto plain on calm winter nights.J Appl Meteor3414391448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kondo, H, Kikegawa, Y 2003Temperature variation in the urban canopy with anthropogenic energy use.Pure Appl Geophys160317324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kondo, H, Liu, FH 1998A study on the urban thermal environment obtained through one-dimensional urban canopy model.J Japan Soc Atmos Environ33179192(in Japanese)Google Scholar
  31. Kusaka, H, Kondo, H, Kikegawa, Y, Kimura, F 2001A simple single-layer urban canopy model for atmospheric models: comparison with multi-layer and slab models.Bound-Layer Meteor101329358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lafore, J-P, Stein, J, Asencio, N, Bougeault, P, Ducrocq, V, Duron, J, Fischer, C, Héreil, P, Mascart, P, Masson, V, Pinty, J-P, Redelsperger, J-L, Richard, E, Vila-Guerau de Arellano, J 1998The Meso-NH atmospheric simulation system. Part I: adiabatic formulation and control simulation.Ann Geophys1690109Google Scholar
  33. Lemonsu, A, Grimmond, CSB, Masson, V 2004Modelling the surface energy balance of an old Mediterranean city core.J Appl Meteor43312327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lemonsu, A, Masson, V 2002Simulation of a summer urban Breeze over Paris.Bound-Layer Meteor104463490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lemonsu, A, Pigeon, G, Masson, V, Moppert, C 2006Sea-town interactions over Marseille: 3D urban boundary layer and thermodynamic fields near the surface.Theor Appl Climatol84171178Google Scholar
  36. Lemonsu A, Bastin S, Masson V, Drobinski P (2005) Vertical structure of the urban boundary layer over Marseille under sea-breeze condition. Bound-Layer Meteor (accepted)Google Scholar
  37. Martilli, A 2002Numerical study of urban impact on boundary layer structure: sensitivity to wind speed, urban morphology and rural soil moisture.J Appl Meteor4112471266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martilli, A 2003A two-dimensional numerical study of the impact of a city on atmospheric circulation and pollutant dispersion in a coastal environment.Bound-Layer Meteor10891119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martilli, A, Clappier, A, Rotach, M 2002An urban surface exchange parameterization for mesoscale models.Bound-Layer Meteor104261304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martilli, A, Roulet, YA, Junier, M, Kirchner, F, Clappier, A, Rotach, M 2003On the impact of urban surface exchange parameterisations on air quality simulations: the Athens case.Atmos Environ3742074231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Masson, V 2000A physically-based scheme for the urban energy budget in atmospheric models.Bound-Layer Meteor94357397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Masson, V, Grimmond, CSB, Oke, TR 2002Evaluation of the Town Energy Balance (TEB) scheme with direct measurements from dry districts in two cities.J Appl Meteor4110111026Google Scholar
  43. Menut, L, Vautard, R, Flamant, C, Abonnel, C, Beekmann, M, Chazette, P, Flamant, PH, Gombert, D, Guedalia, D, Kley, D, Lefebvre, M-P, Lossec, B, Martin, D, Megie, G, Sicard, M, Perros, P, Toupance, G 2000Measurement and modeling of atmospheric pollution over the Paris area: the ESQUIF Project.Annales Geophysicae1814671481Google Scholar
  44. Mills, G 1997An urban canopy-layer climate model.Theor Appl Climatol57229244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Monteith, JL 1965Evaporation and the environment.Symposium of the society for experimental biology19205224Google Scholar
  46. Noilhan, J 1981A model for the net total radiation flux at the surfaces of a building.Building and Environment16259266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Offerle, B, Grimmond, CSB 2003Parameterization of net all-wave radiation for urban areas.J Appl Meteor4211571173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oke, TR 1976The distinction between canopy and boundary-layer urban heat islands.Atmosphere14268277Google Scholar
  49. Oke, TR 1982The energic basis of the urban heat island.Quart J Roy Meteor Soc108124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oke TR (1987) Boundary layer climates, 2nd edn. London: Methuen, 435 ppGoogle Scholar
  51. Oke, TR, Spronken-Smith, RA, Jàuregui, E, Grimmond, CSB 1999The energy balance of central Mexico City during the dry season.Atmos Environ3339193930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rotach, M 2001Urban scale dispersion modelling using a Lagrangian Particule dispersion model.Bound-Layer Meteor99379410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roth, M 2000Review of atmospheric turbulence over cities.Quart J Roy Meteor Soc126941990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rozoff, CM, Cotton, W, Adegoke, J 2003Simulation of St. Louis, Missouri, land use impacts on thunderstorms.J Appl Meteor42716738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sarrat C (2003) Modélisation à l‘échelle régionale de la pollution atmosphérique: application à la campagne ESQUIF. PhD thesis, Université Paul SabatierGoogle Scholar
  56. Taha, H 1999Modifying a mesoscale meteorological model to better incorporate urban heat storage: a bulk parameterization approach.J Appl Meteor38466473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Urano, A, Ichinose, T, Hanaki, K 1999Thermal environment simulation for three dimensional replacement of urban activity.J Wind Engineering81197210Google Scholar
  58. Voogt, JA, Grimmond, CSB 2000Modeling surface sensible heat flux using surface radiative temperatures in a simple urban area.J Appl Meteor3916791699Google Scholar
  59. Vu, TC, Asaeda, T, Ashie, Y 1999Development of a numerical model for the evaluation of the urban thermal environment.J Wind Engineering81181196Google Scholar
  60. Vu, TC, Ashie, Y, Asaeda, T 2002A k-ɛ turbulence closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer including urban canopy.Bound-Layer Meteor102459490Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Masson
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre National de Recherches MétéorologiquesFrance

Personalised recommendations