Advertisement

Kinetic energy exchanges between the time scales of ENSO and the Pacific decadal oscillation

  • Lydia Stefanova
  • T. N. Krishnamurti
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper examines the non-linear kinetic energy interactions of the atmospheric ENSO and decadal oscillations over the Pacific. The calculations are based on a 54-year dataset of tropospheric winds from NCEP reanalysis. We verify that the decadal oscillations have two dominant modes, corresponding well to the pentadecadal and bidecadal modes reported in the literature. Energy interactions involving the range of decadal oscillations and the range of ENSO oscillations are considered in the context of kinetic energy exchanges in the frequency domain. We quantify the relative amplitudes and spatial structures of the quadratic and triplet terms of the kinetic energy exchanges over the Pacific and conclude that quadratic interactions with the mean flow are the dominant term in the kinetic-to-kinetic energy exchanges. Additionally, we show that triplet interactions provide a non-trivial contribution to the total. The interactions between the range of decadal oscillations and the range of ENSO oscillations are found to be the strongest near the regions of maximum oscillation amplitude and of the maximum oscillation amplitude gradient. Due to their similar spatial structures, the two dominant ENSO modes and the bidecadal mode are found to interact in a resonant way. The interactions among the range of ENSO modes and the range of decadal modes are found to strengthen the ENSO modes in the equatorial, subtropical and midlatitude belts, and to weaken the decadal modes in all but the equatorial belt.

Keywords

Pacific Decadal Oscillation Decadal Time Scale Zonal Wind Anomaly Quadratic Interaction Decadal Mode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research was provided by NSF Grants ATM-0419618, ATM-0241517 and NOAA Grant NA16GP1365. Additional funding for this work was provided by DOE and the USDA. The authors would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments and suggestions that helped improve this manuscript.

References

  1. An S-I (2008) A mechanism for the multidecadal oscillation in the North Pacific. Theor Appl Climatol 91:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An S-I, Kug J-S, Timmermann A, Kang I-S, Timm O (2007) The influence of ENSO on the generation of decadal variability in the North Pacific. J Clim 20:667–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett TP, Pierce DW, Latif M, Dommenget D, Saravanan R (1999) Interdecadal interactions between the tropics and midlatitudes in the Pacific basin. Geophys Res Lett 26:615–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chakraborty DR, Agarwal NK (1997) Frequency distribution of tropospheric triad energy interactions during summer monsoon 1988. Pure Appl Geophys 149:761–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chao Y, Ghil M, McWilliams JC (2000) Pacific interdecadal variability in this century’s sea surface temperatures. Geophys Res Lett 27:2261–2264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chhak KC, DiLorenzo E, Schneider N, Cummins P (2009) Forcing of low-frequency ocean variability in the Northeast Pacific. J Clim 22:1255–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankignoul C, Muller P, Zorita E (1997) A simple model of the decadal response of the ocean to stochastic wind forcing. J Phys Ocanogr 27:1533–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garreaud R, Battisti D (1999) Interannual (ENSO) and interdecadal (ENSO-like) variability in the Southern Hemisphere tropospheric circulation. J Clim 12:2113–2123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayashi Y (1980) Estimation of non-linear energy-transfer spectra by the cross-spectral method. J Atmos Sci 37:299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kleeman R, McCreary JP Jr, Klinger BA (1999) A mechanism for generating ENSO decadal variability. Geophys Res Lett 26:1743–1746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krishnamurti TN, Chakraborty DR (2005) The dynamics of phase locking. J Atmos Sci 62:2952–2964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Krishnamurti TN, Sinha MC, Misra V, Sharma OP (1998) Tropical/middle latitude interaction viewed via wave energy flux in frequency Domain. Dyn Atmos Oceans 27:383–412Google Scholar
  13. Krishnamurti TN, Chakraborty DR, Cubukcu N, Stefanova L, Vijaya Kumar TSV (2003) A mechanism of the Madden-Julian Oscillation based on interactions in the frequency domain. Q J R Meteor Soc 129:2559–2590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Latif M, Barnett TP (1994) Causes of decadal climate variability over the North Pacific and North America. Science 266:634–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Levitius S, Antonov JI, Boyer TP, Stephens C (2000) Warming of the world ocean. Science 287:2225–2229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Linsley BK, Wellington GM, Schrag DP (2000) Decadal sea surface temperature variability in the Subtropical South Pacific from 1726 to 1997 A. D. Science 290:1145–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lorenz E (1955) Available potential energy and the maintenance of the general circulation. Tellus 7:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mantua NJ, Hare SR, Zhang Y, Wallace JM, Francis RC (1997) A Pacific interdecadal climate oscillation with impacts on salmon production. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 76:1069–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Minobe S (1997) 50–70 year oscillation over North Pacific and North America. Geophys Res Lett 24:683–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Minobe S (1999) Resonance in bidecadal and pentadecadal climate oscillations over the North Pacific: role in climate regime shifts. Geophys Res Lett 26:855–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Newman M, Compo GP, Alexander MA (2003) ENSO-forced variability of the Pacific decadal oscillation. J Clim 16:3853–3857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rodgers KB, Friederichs P, Latif M (2004) Tropical Pacific Decadal variability and its relation to decadal modulation of ENSO. J Clim 19:3761–3774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saltzman B (1957) Equations governing the energetics of the larger scales of atmospheric turbulence in the domain of wave number. J. Meteor 14:513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schneider N, Cornuelle BD (2005) The forcing of the Pacific Decadal Oscillaion. J Clim 18:4355–4373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sheng J, Derome J (1991) An observational study of the energy transfer between the seasonal mean flow and the transient eddies. Tellus 43A:128–144Google Scholar
  26. Sheng J, Hayashi Y (1990a) Observed and simulated energy cycles in the frequency domain. J Atmos Sci 47:1243–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sheng J, Hayashi Y (1990b) Estimation of atmospheric energetics in the frequency domain in the FGGE year. J Atmos Sci 47:1255–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Strong C, Magnusdottir G (2009) The role of tropospheric Rossby wave breaking in the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. J Clim 22:1819–1833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wu L, Liu Z, Gallimore R, Jacob R, Lee D, Zhong Y (2003) Pacific decadal variability: the tropical Pacific mode and the North Pacific mode. J Clim 16:1101–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang Y, Wallace JM, Battisti DS (1997) ENSO-like interdecadal variability: 1900–93. J Clim 10:1004–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction StudiesThe Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric ScienceThe Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations