Advertisement

Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics

, Volume 107, Issue 3–4, pp 81–89 | Cite as

Weather type dependent quality assessment of a satellite-based rainfall detection scheme for the mid-latitudes

  • Boris Thies
  • Andreas Turek
  • Thomas Nauss
  • Jörg Bendix
Original Paper

Abstract

The sensitivity of a recently published satellite-based rainfall detection scheme with differing frontal weather regimes is investigated for 676 precipitation scenes between January and August 2004. For this purpose, the rain area classified by the recent Rain Area Delineation Scheme during Night time (RADS-N) was compared to the rain area detected by the radar network of the German Weather Service. The validation results indicate that the rain area detected by RADS-N is highly consistent with the radar network (mean POD: 0.62; mean FAR: 0.52; mean ETS: 0.22). However, the bias indicates a mean overestimation of 42%. The classification results show that the satellite technique performs better in cold frontal situations and thunderstorms. Therefore, further investigations are needed to address the overall performance as well as the dependency on different weather situations and in order to allow reliable rain area detection during night-time, independent of the prevailing weather situation.

Keywords

Weather Situation Equitable Threat Score Radar Network False Alarm Ratio Rain Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the German Weather Service (DWD) for providing the ground-based precipitation dataset. The current study was funded by the German Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF) in the framework of GLOWA-Danube project (G-D/2004/TP-10, precipitation/remote sensing), as well as by the German Research Council DFG (BE 1780/18-1) within the SORT project. Furthermore, the authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for valuable remarks and comments which helped to improve the manuscript.

References

  1. Adler RF, Negri AJ (1988) A satellite technique to estimate tropical convective and stratiform rainfall. J Appl Meteor 27:30–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arking A, Childs JD (1985) Retrieval of cloud cover parameters from multispectral satellite images. J Appl Meteor 24:322–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ba MB, Gruber A (2001) GOES multispectral rainfall algorithm (GMSRA). J Appl Meteor 40:1500–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellon A, Lovejoy S, Austin GL (1980) Combining satellite and radar data for the short-range forecasting of precipitation. Mon Wea Rev 108:1554–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendix J, Reudenbach C, Rollenbeck R (2003) The Marburg Satellite Station. In: Proceedings of EUMETSAT 2002 conference, pp 139–146Google Scholar
  6. Berliner Wetterkarte V (ed) (2004) Berliner Wetterkarte, vol. 53, pp 1–168Google Scholar
  7. Bissolli P, Dittmann E (2001) The objective weather type classification of the German Weather Service and its possibilities of application to environmental and meteorological investigations. Met Ztsch 10:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bissolli P, Dittmann E (2005) Objektive Wetterlagenklassen 2004. In: DWD (ed) Klimastatusbericht 2004, Offenbach, pp 122–128Google Scholar
  9. Cermak J, Bendix J, Dobbermann M (2008) FMet—an integrated framework for Meteosat data processing for operational scientific applications. Comput Geosci 34:1638–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng M, Brown R, Collier CG (1993) Delineation of precipitation areas by correlation of METEOSAT visible and infrared data in the region of the United Kingdom. J Appl Meteor 32:884–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiaravalloti F, Gabriele S (2009) Vibo Valentia flood and MSG rainfall evaluation. Atmos Res 93:286–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ebert E, Janowiak J, Kidd C (2007) Comparison of near-real-time precipitation estimates from satellite observations and numerical models. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88:47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feijt AJ, Jolivet D, Koelemeijer R, Deneke H (2004) Recent improvements to LWP retrievals from AVHRR. Atmos Res 72:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Früh B, Bendix J, Nauss T, Paulat M, Pfeiffer A, Schipper JW, Thies B, Wernli H (2007) Verification of precipitation from regional climate simulations and remote-sensing observations with respect to ground-based observations in the upper Danube catchment. Meteorol Z 16:275–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greuell W, Roebeling RA (2009) Toward a standard procedure for validation of satellite-derived cloud liquid water path: A study with SEVIRI data. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48:1575–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Han Q, Rossow WB, Lacis AA (1994) Near-global survey of effective droplet radii in liquid water clouds using ISCCP data. J Clim 7:465–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Houze RA (1993) Cloud dynamics, Int Geophys Ser, vol 53. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaeneke M (1995) Der Radarverbund des DWD als Hilfsmittel der regionalen und lokalen Gewitterprognose. Promet 24:55–72Google Scholar
  19. Jolliffe IT, Stephenson DB (ed) (2003) Forecast verification: a practitioner’s guide in atmospheric science. Wiley, London, 240 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Kawamoto K, Nakajima T, Nakajima TY (2001) A global determination of cloud microphysics with AVHRR remote sensing. J Clim 14:2054–2068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King MD, Tsay SC, Platnick SE, Wang M, Liou KN (1997) Cloud retrieval algorithms for MODIS: optical thickness, effective particle radius, and thermodynamic phase, NASAGoogle Scholar
  22. Kokhanovsky AA, Nauss T (2005) Satellite-based retrieval of ice cloud properties using a semi-analytical algorithm. J Geophys Res Atmos 110/D19: D19206Google Scholar
  23. Kokhanovsky AA, Rozanov VV, Zege PE, Bovensmann H, Burrows JP (2003) A semianalytical cloud retrieval algorithm using backscattered radiation in 0.4–2.4 Am spectral region. J Geophys Res 108:4-1–4-19Google Scholar
  24. Kurino T (1997) A satellite infrared technique for estimating ‘deep/shallow’ precipitation. Adv Space Res 19:511–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lang P (1997) Niederschlagsquantifizierung auf der Basis von Radardaten. Promet 26:22–31Google Scholar
  26. Lensky IM, Rosenfeld D (2003a) A night-rain delineation algorithm for infrared satellite data based on microphysical considerations. J Appl Meteorol 42:1218–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lensky IM, Rosenfeld D (2003b) Satellite-based insights into precipitation formation processes in continental and maritime convective clouds at nighttime. J Appl Meteorol 42:1227–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levizzani V (2003) Satellite rainfall estimations: new perspectives for meteorology and climate from the EURAINSAT project. Ann Geophys 46:363–372Google Scholar
  29. Levizzani V, Schmetz J, Lutz HJ, Kerkmann J, Alberoni PP, Cervino M (2001) Precipitation estimations from geostationary orbit and prospects for Meteosat Second Generation. J Meteor Appl 8:23–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mason I (1982) A model for assessment of weather forecasts. Aust Met Mag 30:291–303Google Scholar
  31. Nakajima T, King M (1990) Determination of the optical thickness and effective particle radius of clouds from reflected solar radiation measurements. Part I: theory. J Atmos Sci 47:1878–1893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nakajima TY, Nakajima T (1995) Wide-area determination of cloud microphysical properties from NOAA AVHRR measurements for FIRE and ASTEX regions. J Atmos Sci 52:4043–4059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nauss T, Kokhanovsky AA (2006) Discriminating raining from non-raining clouds at mid-latitudes using multispectral satellite data. Atmos Chem Phys 6:5031–5036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nauss T, Kokhanovsky AA (2007) Assignment of rainfall confidence values using multispectral satellite data at mid-latitudes: First results. Adv Geosci 10:99–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Platnick S, King MD, Ackerman SA, Menzel WP, Baum BA, Riedi JC, Frey RA (2003) The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from Terra. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41:459–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Porcù F, Capacci D (2007) Seasonal sensitivity of a VIS-NIRIR rain-no rain classifier. Meteor Atmos Phys 101:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reudenbach C, Heinemann G, Heuel E, Bendix J, Winiger M (2001) Investigation of summertime convective rainfall in Western Europe based on a synergy of remote sensing data and numerical models. Meteorol Atmos Phys 76:23–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reudenbach C, Nauss T, Cermak J, Dobbermann M, Bendix J, Theissen W, Scheidgen P, Harmann O (2004) An integrated receiving and processing unit for MSG, NOAA and Terra/Aqua data. In: Proceedings of EUMETSAT 2003 conference, pp 291–297Google Scholar
  39. Riedl J (1986) Radar-Flächenniederschlagsmessung. Promet 16:20–23Google Scholar
  40. Roebeling PD, Feijt AJ, Stammes P (2006) Cloud property retrievals for climate monitoring: implications of differences between spinning enhanced visible and infrared imager (SEVIRI) on METEOSAT-8 and advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) on NOAA-17. J Geophys Res 111:D20210. doi: 10.1029/2005JD006990
  41. Roebeling RA, Deneke HM, Feijt AJ (2008) Validation of cloud liquid water path retrievals from SEVIRI using one year of CloudNET observations. J Appl Meteor Climatol 47:206–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seltmann J (1997) Radarforschung im DWD: Vom Scan zum Produkt. Promet 26:32–42Google Scholar
  43. Stanski HR, Wilson LJ, Burrows WR (1989) Survey of common verification methods in meteorology. World Weather Watch Technical Report 8, WMO/TD 358, WMO, Genf, 114 ppGoogle Scholar
  44. Thies B, Nauss T, Bendix J (2008a) Discriminating raining from non-raining cloud areas at mid-latitudes using Meteosat Second Generation SEVIRI day-time data. Atmos Chem Phys 8:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thies B, Nauss T, Bendix J (2008b) Delineation of raining from non-raining clouds during nighttime using Meteosat-8 data. Meteorol Appl 15:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Turk J, Bauer P (2006) The International Precipitation Working Group and its role in the improvement of quantitative precipitation measurements. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87:643–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vicente GA, Davenport JC, Scofield RA (2002) The role of orographic and parallax corrections on real time high resolution satellite rainfall rate distribution. Int J Remote Sens 23:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wetterzentrale (2007a) Archiv der stündlichen Wettermeldungen. Online available at: http://www.wetterzentrale.de/topkarten/tkdwdar2.htm
  49. Wetterzentrale (2007b) Archiv der Europablitzkarten. Online available at: http://www.wetterzentrale.de/topkarten/tkbeoblar.htm
  50. WWRP/WGNE Joint Working Group on Verification (2007) Forecast verification—issues, methods and FAQ. Online available at: http://www.bom.gov.au/bmrc/wefor/staff/eee/verif/verif_web_page.html

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boris Thies
    • 1
  • Andreas Turek
    • 1
  • Thomas Nauss
    • 2
  • Jörg Bendix
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Climatology and Remote Sensing, Faculty of GeographyPhilipps-University MarburgMarburgGermany
  2. 2.KlimatologieUniversität BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations