Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics

, Volume 116, Issue 1–2, pp 27–42 | Cite as

The bimodal downslope windstorms at Kvísker

  • Hálfdán Ágústsson
  • Haraldur Ólafsson
Original Paper


Downslope windstorms at Kvísker in Southeast Iceland are explored using a mesoscale model, observations and numerical analysis of the atmosphere. Two different types of gravity-wave induced windstorms are identified. At the surface, their main difference is in the horizontal extent of the lee-side accelerated flow. Type S (Short) is a westerly windstorm, which is confined to the lee-slopes of Mount Öræfajökull, while a Type E (Extended) windstorm occurs in the northerly flow and is not confined to the lee-slopes but continues some distance downstream of the mountain. The Type S windstorm may be characterized as a more pure gravity-wave generated windstorm than the Type E windstorm which bears a greater resemblance to local flow acceleration described by hydraulic theory. The low-level flow in the Type E windstorm is of arctic origin and close to neutral with an inversion well above the mountain top level. At middle tropospheric levels there is a reverse vertical windshear. The Type S windstorm occurs in airmasses of southerly origin. It also has a well-mixed, but a shallower boundary-layer than the Type E windstorms. Aloft, the winds increase with height and there is an amplified gravity wave. Climate projections indicate a possible decrease in windstorm frequency up to the year 2050.


Gravity Wave Wind Shear Hydraulic Jump Vertical Wind Shear Automatic Weather Station 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study is partly funded by Kvískerjasjóður and is carried out in connection with the RÁV project which is supported by the Icelandic Research Fund (RANNÍS). We also acknowledge the contribution of Vegagerðin to the monitoring of the windstorms. Furthermore, the contribution of two anonymous reviewers is acknowledged.


  1. Ágústsson H, Ólafsson H (2004) Mean gust factors in complex terrain. Meteorol Z 13(2):149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ágústsson H, Ólafsson H (2007) Simulating a severe windstorm in complex terrain. Meteorol Z 16(1):111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ágústsson H, Ólafsson H (2009) Forecasting wind gusts in complex terrain. Meteorol Atmos Phys 103(1–4):173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belušić D, Pasarić M, Orlić M (2004) Quasi-periodic bora gusts related to the structure of the troposphere. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130(598):1103–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belušić D, Žagar M, Grisogono B (2007) Numerical simulation of pulsation in the bora wind. Q J R Meteorol Soc 133(627):1371–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brasseur O (2001) Development and application of a physical approach to estimating wind gusts. Mon Weather Rev 129:5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brummer B (1996) Boundary-layer modification in wintertime cold-air outbreaks from the arctic sea ice. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 80:109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark TL, Farley RD (1984) Severe downslope windstorm calculations in two and three spatial dimensions using anelastic interactive grid nesting: a possible mechanism for gustiness. J Atmos Sci 41(3):329–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark TL, Hall WD, Banta RM (1994) Two- and three-dimensional simulations of the 9 January 1989 severe Boulder windstorm: comparison with observation. J Atmos Sci 51(16):2317–2343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doyle JD, Durran DR, Chen C, Colle BA, Georgelin M, Grubišić V, Hsu WR, Huang C, Landau D, Lin YL, Poulos GS, Sun WY, Weber DB, Wurtele MG, Xue M (2000) An intercomparison of model-predicted wave breaking for the 11 January 1972. Boulder windstorm. Mon Weather Rev 128(3):901–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doyle JD, Shapiro MA, Jiang Q, Bartels DL (2005) Large-amplitude mountain wave breaking over Greenland. J Atmos Sci 62(9):3106–3126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Durran DR (1990) Mountain waves and downslope winds. In: Blumen W (ed) Atmospheric processes over complex terrain. American Meteorological Society Monographs, vol 23(45). American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 59–81Google Scholar
  13. Feltz WF, Bedka KM, Otkin JA, Greenwald T, Ackerman SA (2009) Understanding satellite-observed mountain-wave signatures using high-resolution numerical model data. Weather Forecast 24(1):76–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goyette S, Brasseur O, Beniston M (2003) Application of a new wind gust parametrization: multiscale case studies performed with the Canadian regional climate model. J Geophys Res 108(D13):4374. doi: 10.1029/2002JD002646 Google Scholar
  15. Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR (1995) A description of the fifth-generation PennState/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). Technical report NCAR/TN-398+STR. National Center for Atmospheric Research. Accessed May 2004
  16. Grisogono B, Belušić D (2009) A review of recent advances in understanding the meso- and microscale properties of the severe Bora wind. Tellus 61A(1):1–16Google Scholar
  17. Grubišić V, Doyle JD, Kuettner J, Mobbs S, Smith RB, Whiteman CD, Dirks R, Czyzyk S, Cohn SA, Vosper S, Weissmann M, Haimov S, Wekker SFJD, Pan LL, Chow FK (2008) The terrain-induced rotor experiment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 89(10):1513–1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haugen JE, Haakenstad H (2006) The development of HIRHAM version 2 with 50 km and 25 km resolution. Tech Rep RegClim Gen Techn Rep No. 9, Norwegian Meteorological InstituteGoogle Scholar
  19. Haugen JE, Iversen T (2008) Response in extremes of daily precipitation and wind from a downscaled multi-model ensemble of anthropogenic global climate change scenarios. Tellus 60A(3):411–426Google Scholar
  20. Hertenstein RF, Kuettner JP (2005) Rotor types associated with steep lee topography: influence of the wind profile. Tellus 57A(2):117–135Google Scholar
  21. Hewitt CD, Griggs DJ (2004) Ensembles-based predictions of climate changes and their impacts. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 85(52):566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Janjić ZI (1990) The step mountain coordinate: physical package. Mon Weather Rev 118(7):1429–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Janjić ZI (1994) The step-mountain eta coordinate model: further development of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulent closure schemes. Mon Weather Rev 122(5):927–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lane TP, Doyle J, Sharman R, Shapiro MA, Watson C (2009) Statistics and dynamics of aircraft encounters of turbulence over Greenland. Mon Weather Rev 137(8):2687–2702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ólafsson H, Ágústsson H (2007) The Freysnes downslope windstorm. Meteorol Z 16(1):123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ólafsson H, Ágústsson H (2009) Gravity wave breaking in easterly flow over Greenland and associated low level barrier- and reverse tip-jets. Meteorol Atmos Phys 104(3):191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ólafsson H, Økland H (1994) Precipitation from convective boundary layers in arctic air masses. Tellus 46A:4–13Google Scholar
  28. Ólafsson H, Sigurjónsson H, Ágústsson H (2002) SNEX — the Snæfellsnes experiment. In: Proceedings of the 10th conference on mountain meteorology. American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 400–401Google Scholar
  29. Reinecke PA, Durran DR (2009) Initial condition sensitivities and the predictability of downslope winds. J Atmos Sci 66(11):3401–3418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reisner J, Rasmussen RM, Bruintjes RT (1998) Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 124B(548):1071–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Renfrew IA, Moore GWK, Kristjánsson JE, Ólafsson H, Gray SL, Petersen GN, Bovis K, Brown PRA, Føre I, Haine T, Hay C, Irvine EA, Lawrence A, Ohigashi T, Outten S, Pickart RS, Shapiro M, Sproson D, Swinbank R, Woolley A, Zhang S (2008) The Greenland flow distortion experiment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 89(9):1307–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rögnvaldsson Ó, Bao JW, Ágústsson H, Ólafsson H (2010) Downslope windstorm in Iceland—WRF/MM5 model comparison. Atmos Chem Phys (in review)Google Scholar
  33. Smith RB (2004) Mountain meteorology and regional climates. In: Fedorovich E, Rotunno R, Stevens B (eds) Atmospheric turbulence and mesoscale meteorology—scientific research inspired by Doug Lilly, chap 9. Cambridge University Press, pp 193–221Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Meteorological ResearchReykjavíkIceland
  2. 2.University of IcelandReykjavíkIceland
  3. 3.Icelandic Meteorological OfficeReykjavíkIceland
  4. 4.Bergen School of Meteorology, Geophysical InstituteUniversity of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations