Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics

, Volume 105, Issue 3–4, pp 191–210 | Cite as

Regional climate model simulation of the AMMA Special Observing Period #3 and the pre-Helene easterly wave

  • Leonard M. Druyan
  • Matthew Fulakeza
  • Patrick Lonergan
  • Erik Noble
Original Paper

Abstract

The study examines results of dynamic downscaling of two global analyses: the National Center for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) reanalysis II and the Global Forecast System final analysis (FNL). Downscaling to a 0.5° grid over West Africa and the adjacent Atlantic Ocean is accomplished by each of two regional models, the Regional Model, version 3 (RM3) of the Center for Climate Systems Research and the Weather, Research and Forecasting model (WRF). Simulations are for September 2006, the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis (AMMA) Special Observing Period #3 (SOP-3). The aim of this study is to exploit the increased spatial detail in the simulations and representations of climate fields by the regional models to analyze meteorological systems within the SOP-3 area of interest and time frame. In particular, the paper focuses on the regional models’ representations of the structure and movement of a prominent easterly wave during September 10–13th, the precursor of Tropical Storm/Hurricane Helene. It describes the RM3 simulated structure of the developing storm in terms of circulation, precipitation, vertical motion, cumulus heating rates, and cross-sections of wind and geopotential height anomalies. Simulated cumulus heating rates within the wave’s main precipitation area imply a lowering of the bases of active cumulus in the transition from the African continent to the Atlantic, indicating that the ocean environment promotes greater upward latent heat flux that in turn intensifies overlying storms. RM3 circulation, precipitation patterns, and storm trajectory are reasonably consistent with observational evidence. Experiments show that precipitation rates near 6°N over the eastern North Atlantic are sensitive to vertical thermal stability, such that they are enhanced by warmer in situ sea-surface temperatures (SSTs) and diminished by colder SSTs. However, prescribing colder SST causes increases in precipitation north of 9°N within areas of large scale upward vertical motion where rainfall rates are less sensitive to in situ SSTs. The evaluation of WRF indicates that its storm propagation is too fast over West Africa, where associated WRF precipitation rates are exaggerated, but its performance is improved over the Atlantic.

References

  1. Brown D (2006) Tropical cyclone report, Hurricane Helene (AL082006). National Hurricane Center, NOAA, Miami, FL, p 12Google Scholar
  2. Chen F, Dudhia J (2001) Coupling an advanced land-surface/hydrology model with the Penn State/NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: model description and implementation. Mon Wea Rev 129:569–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiang JCH, Kushnir Y, Giannini A (2002) Deconstructing Atlantic ITCZ variability: influence of the local cross-equatorial SST gradient, and remote forcing from the eastern equatorial Pacific. J Geophys Res 107(D1):4004. doi:10.1029/2000JD000307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chou M-D, Suarez MJ (1994) An efficient thermal infrared radiation parameterization for use in general circulation models. NASA Tech Memo 104606 3:85Google Scholar
  5. Del Genio A, Yao M-S (1993) Efficient cumulus parameterization for long-term climate studies. The GISS scheme. In: Emanuel K, Raymond D (eds) Cumulus parameterization, vol 24. American Meteorology Society Monograph Series, Boston, pp 181–184Google Scholar
  6. Del Genio A, Yao M-S, Kovari W, Lo K-W (1996) A prognostic cloud water parameterization for global climate models. J Clim 9:270–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diedhiou A, Janicot S, Viltard A, de Felice P, Laurent H (1999) Easterly wave regimes and associated convection over West Africa and tropical Atlantic: results from NCEP/NCAR and ECMWF reanalyses. Clim Dyn 15:795–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Druyan L, Fulakeza M (2005) Mesoscale climate analysis over West Africa. CLIVAR Exch 10(20):34–35Google Scholar
  9. Druyan L, Fulakeza M, Lonergan P (2006) Mesoscale analyses of West African summer climate: focus on wave disturbances. Clim Dyn 27:459–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Druyan L, Fulakeza M, Lonergan P (2008) The impact of vertical resolution on regional model simulation of the west African summer monsoon. Int J Climatol 28:1293–1314. doi:10.1002/joc.1636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fritsch M, Carbone R (2004) Improving quantitative precipitation forecasts in the warm season. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85:955–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Futyan J, Del Genio A (2007) Deep convective system evolution over Africa and the tropical Atlantic. J Clim 20:5041–5060. doi:10.1175/JCLI4297.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hansen J et al (2002) Climate forcings in Goddard Institute for Space Studies SI2000 simulations. JGR 107:4347. doi:10.1029/200IJD001143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kain, JS, Fritsch JM (1993) Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: The Kain-Fritcsh scheme. In: Emanuel KA, Raymond, DJ (eds) The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models. American Meteorology Society, p 246Google Scholar
  15. Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J, Yang SK, Hnilo JJ, Fiorino M, Potter GL (2002) NCEP-DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1631–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiladis G, Thorncroft C (2008) Three-dimensional structure of easterly wave disturbances over Africa and tropical North Atlantic. 20th conference on climate variability and change, New Orleans. http://ams.confex.com/ams/88Annual/techprogram/paper_128178.htm. Accessed 21 Jan 2008
  17. Mlawer EJ, Taubman SJ, Brown PD, Iacono MJ, Clough SA (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the long- wave. J Geophys Res 102(D14):16663–16682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Redelsperger JL, Thorncroft CD, Diedhiou A, Lebel T, Parker DJ, Polcher J (2006) African monsoon multidisciplinary analysis: An international research project and field campaign. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87:1739–1746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reed R, Klinker E, Hollingsworth A (1988) The structure and characteristics of African easterly wave disturbances as determined from the ECMWF operational analysis/forecast system. Meteorol Atmos Phys 38:22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosenzweig C, Abramopoulos F (1997) Land-surface model development for the GISS GCM. J Clim 10:2040–2054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schmidlin FJ, Morrison BJ, Northam ET, Gerlach J (2007) Detailed observations of five African Easterly waves during NAMMA. Ppt presentation, NAMMA Science Team Meeting. Workshop, Baltimore, MD, May 2007Google Scholar
  22. Skamarock WC et al (2005) A description of the advanced research WRF version 2. NCAR technical note, June 2005, Revised January 2005Google Scholar
  23. Thorncroft C, Hodges K (2001) African easterly wave variability and its relationship to Atlantic tropical cyclone activity. J Clim 14:1166–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonard M. Druyan
    • 1
  • Matthew Fulakeza
    • 1
  • Patrick Lonergan
    • 1
  • Erik Noble
    • 2
  1. 1.NASA/Goddard Institute for Space Studies, NYC and Center for Climate Systems ResearchColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.University of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations