Advertisement

Comparison of NCEP turbulent heat fluxes with in situ observations over the south-eastern Arabian Sea

  • D. Swain
  • S. H. Rahman
  • M. RavichandranEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Turbulent surface heat fluxes (latent and sensible heat) are the two most important parameters through which air–sea interaction takes place at the ocean–atmosphere interface. These fluxes over the global ocean are required to drive ocean models and to validate coupled ocean–atmosphere global models. But because of inadequate in situ observations these are the least understood parameters over the tropical Indian Ocean. Surface heat fluxes also contribute to the oceanic heat budget and control the sea surface temperature in conjunction with upper ocean stratification and ocean currents. The most widely used flux products in diagnostic studies and forcing of ocean general circulation models are the ones provided by the National Centres for Environment Prediction (NCEP) reanalysis. In this study we have compared NCEP reanalysed marine meteorological parameters, which are used for turbulent heat fluxes, with the moored buoy observation in the south-eastern Arabian Sea. The NCEP latent heat flux (LHF) and sensible heat flux (SHF) derived from bulk aerodynamic formula are also compared with that of ship and buoy derived LHF and SHF. The analysis is being carried out during the pre-monsoon and monsoon season of 2005. The analysis shows that NCEP latent as well as sensible heat fluxes are largely underestimated during the monsoon season, however, it is reasonably comparable during the pre-monsoon period. This is largely due to the underestimation of NCEP reanalysis air temperature (AT), wind speed (WS) and relative humidity (RH) compared to buoy observations. The mean differences between buoy and NCEP parameters during the monsoon (pre-monsoon) period are ~21% (~14%) for WS, ~6% (~3%) for RH, and ~0.75% (0.9%) for AT, respectively. The sudden drop in AT during rain events could not be captured by the NCEP data and, hence, large underestimations in SHF. During the pre-monsoon period, major contribution to LHF variations comes from WS, however, both surface winds and relative humidity controls the LHF variations during the monsoon. LHF is mainly determined by WS and RH during the monsoon and, WS is the main contributor during the pre-monsoon.

Keywords

Wind Speed Root Mean Square Error Latent Heat Flux North Indian Ocean Numerical Weather Prediction Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Director, Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS), the Director, Space Physics Laboratory (SPL), and all other colleagues for their encouragement and support. Moored buoy data was provided by NDBP/NIOT, Chennai and ship data was provided by IISc/NCAOR. We would also like to thank the reviewers for very critical yet significant comments and suggestions which have contributed in improving the quality of this paper.

References

  1. Adler RF, Huffman GJ, Bolvin DT, Curtis S, Nelkin EJ (2000) Tropical rainfall distributions determined using TRMM combined with other satellite and raingauge information. J Appl Meteorol 39:2007–2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson SP, Baumgartner MF (1998) Radiative heating errors in naturally ventilated air temperature measurements made from buoys. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 15:157–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson SP, Hinton A, Weller RA (1998) Moored observations of precipitation temperature. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 15:979–986Google Scholar
  4. Anderson RJ, Smith SD (1981) Evaporation coefficient for the sea surface from eddy flux measurements. J Geophys Res 86(C1):449–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beljaars ACM (1997) Air–sea interaction in the ECMWF model. In: Proceedings of seminar on atmosphere–surface interaction, ECMWF. Reading, United Kingdom, pp 33–52Google Scholar
  6. Bhat GS, Gadgil S, Hareesh KPV, Kalsi SR, Madhusoodanan P, Murty VSN, Prasada RCVK, Ramesh BV, Rao LVG, Rao RR, Ravichandran M, Reddy KG, Rao PS, Sengupta D, Sikka DR, Swain J, Vinayachandran PN (2001) BOBMEX—The Bay of Bengal monsoon experiment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:2217–2243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bony S, Sud Y, Lau KM, Susskind J, Saha S (1997) Comparison and satellite assessment of NASA/DAO and NCEP/NCAR reanalyses over tropical ocean: atmospheric hydrology and radiation. J Clim 10(6):1441–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradley EF, Fairall CW, Hare JE, Grachev AA (2000) An old and improved bulk algorithm for air–sea fluxes: COARE 2.6a. Preprints. 14th symposium on boundary layers and turbulence, Aspen, CO, Am Meteorol Soc, pp 294–296Google Scholar
  9. Chelton DB (2001) Scatterometer—based assessment of surface wind field analyses from the European Centre medium—range weather forecasts. In: Proceedings of WCRP/SCOR workshop on intercomparison and validation of ocean–atmosphere flux fields. WCRP-115, WMO/TD-1083, Potomac, MD, WCRP, pp 135–141Google Scholar
  10. Curry JA, Clayson CA, Rossow WB, Reeder R, Zhang YC, Webster PJ, Liu G, Sheu RS (1999) High resolution satellite-derived dataset of the surface fluxes of heat, freshwater, and momentum for the TOGA COARE IOP. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 80:2059–2080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Cosmo J, Katsaros KB, Smith SD, Anderson RJ, Oost WA, Bumke K, Chadwick H (1996) Air–sea exchange of water vapor and sensible heat: The Humidity Exchange over the Sea (HEXOS) results. J Geophys Res 101:12,001–12,016Google Scholar
  12. Donlon CW, GHRSST-PP Science Team (2005) The GHRSST-PP product user manual, GDS-v1.5, report, International GHRSST-PP Project Office, Exeter, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Donlon CW, Minnet PJ, Gentemann C, Nightingale TJ, Barton IJ, Ward B, Murray MJ (2002) Towards improved validation of satellite sea surface skin temperature measurements for climate research. J Clim 15:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Durand F, Shetye SR, Vialard J, Shankar D, Shenoi SSC, Ethe C, Madec G (2004) Impact of temperature inversionson SST evolution in the South-Eastern Arabian Seaduring pre-summer monsoon season. Geophys Res Lett 31:L01305. doi: 10.1029/2003GL018906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fairall CW, Bradley EF, Rogers DP, Edson JB, Young GS (1996) Bulk parameterization of air–sea fluxes for TOGA COARE. J Geophys Res 101:3747–3764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goswami BN, Rajagopal EN (2003) Indian ocean surface winds from NCMRWF analysis as compared to QuikSCAT and moored buoy winds. Proc Indian Acad Sci (Earth Planet Sci) 112:61–77Google Scholar
  17. Goswami BN, Sengupta D (2003) A note on the deficiency of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis surface winds over the equatorial Indian Ocean. J Geophys Res 108(C4):3124. doi: 10.1029/2002JC001497 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halpern D, Freilich MH, Weller RA (1999) ECMWF and ERS-I surface winds over the Arabian Sea during July 1995. J Phys Oceanogr 29:1619–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones CS, Legler DM, O’Brien JJ (1995) Variability of surface fluxes over the Indian Ocean; 1960–1989. Glob Atmos Ocean Syst 3:249–272Google Scholar
  20. Joseph PV (1990) Warm pool in the Indian Ocean and monsoon onset. Trop Ocean Atmos Newsl 53:1–5Google Scholar
  21. Josey SA (2001) A comparison of ECMWF, NCEP–NCAR, and SOC surface heat fluxes with moored buoy measurements in the subduction region of the northeast Atlantic. J Clim 14:1780–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77(3):437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kitoh A (2002) Effects of large-scale mountains on surface climate–a coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation model study. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 80(5):1165–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kubota M, Kano A, Muramatsu H, Tomita H (2003) Intercomparison of various surface latent heat flux fields. J Clim 16:670–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurian J, Vinayachandran PN (2006) Formationmechanisms of temperature inversions in the southeastern Arabian Sea. Geophys Res Lett 33:L17611. doi: 10.1029/2006GL027280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurian J, Vinayachandran PN (2007) Mechanisms of formation of the Arabian Sea mini warm pool in a high resolution OGCM. J Geophys Res (112):C05009. doi: 10.1029/2006JC003631
  27. Liu WT, Katsaros KB, Businger JA (1979) Bulk parameterizations of air–sea exchanges of heat and water vapor including molecular constraints at the interface. J Atmos Sci 36:1722–1735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moore GWK, Renfrew IA (2002) An assessment of the surface turbulent heat fluxes from the NCEP reanalysis over the western boundary currents. J Clim 15:2020–2037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moyer KA, Weller RA (1997) Observations of surface forcing from the subduction experiment: a comparison with global model products and climatological datasets. J Clim 10:2725–2742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Panofsky HA, Dutton JA (1984) Atmospheric turbulence, Wiley, New York, 397 ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Rao PS, Sikka DR (2005) Intraseasonal variablity of the summer monsoon over the north Indian Ocean as revealed by the BOBMEX and ARMEX field programs. Pure Appl Geophys 162:1481–1510. doi: 10.1007/s00024-005-2680-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rao RR, Sivakumar R (1999) On the possible mechanisms of the evolution of a mini-warm pool during the presummer monsoon season and the onset vortex in the southeastern Arabian Sea. Q J R Meteorol Soc 125(555 Part A):787–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Renfrew IA, Moore GWK, Guest PS, Bumke K (2002) A comparison of surface-layer and surface turbulent-flux observations over the Labrador Sea with ECMWF analyses and NCEP reanalyses. J Phys Oceanogr 32:383–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rouault M, Reason CJC, Lutjeharms JRE, Beljaars ACM (2003) Underestimation of latent and sensible heat fluxes above the Agulhas current in NCEP and ECMWF analyses. J Clim 16:776–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Senan R, Anitha DS, Sengupta D (2001) Validation of SST and WS from TRMM using north Indian Ocean moored buoy observations. CAOS report 2001AS1, Center for Atmospheric Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  36. Sengupta D, Ravichandran M (2001) Oscillations of Bay of Bengal sea surface temperature during the 1998 summer monsoon. Geophys Res Lett 28:2033–2036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sengupta D, Joseph P, Senan R, Suresh Kumar G (1999) Validation NCEP daily surface winds over the north Indian Ocean. CAOS report 99AS1, Center for Atmospheric Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  38. Sengupta D, Goswami BN, Senan R (2001) Coherent intraseasonal oscillations of ocean and atmosphere during Asian Summer monsoon. Geophys Res Lett 28:4127–4130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shenoi SSC, Shankar D, Shetye SR (1999) On these a surface temperature high in the Lakshadweep Sea before the onset of southwest monsoon. J Geophys Res 104(C7):15,703–15,712Google Scholar
  40. Shetye SR (1986) A model study of the seasonal cycle of the Arabian Sea surface temperature. J Mar Res 44:521–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shinoda T, Hendon H, Glick J (1999) Intraseasonal surface fluxes in the tropical western Pacific and Indian Oceans from NCEP reanalyses. Mon Weather Rev 127:678–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Siefridt L, Barnier B, Beranger K, Roquet H (1999) Evaluation of operational ECMWF surface heat fluxes: impact of parameterisation changes during 1986–1996. J Mar Syst 19:113–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith SD (1988) Coefficients for sea surface wind stress, heat flux, and wind profiles as a function of wind speed and temperature. J Geophys Res 93(15):467–15,472Google Scholar
  44. Smith SR, Legler DM, Verzone KV (2001) Quantifying uncertainties in NCEP reanalyses using high quality research vessel observations. J Clim 14:4062–4072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smull BF and McPhaden MJ (1998) Comparison of NCEP/NCAR and ECMWF reanalysed fields with TOGA TAO buoy observations over the tropical Pacific. In: Proceedings of first WCRP international conference on reanalyses, Geneva, Switzerland, World Meteorological Organization, pp 227–330Google Scholar
  46. Stevenson JW (1982) Computation of heat and momentum fluxes at the sea surface water during Hawaii to Tahiti shuttle experiment. Hawaii Institute of Geophysics. Report HIG-82-4Google Scholar
  47. Sun B, Yu L, Weller RA (2003) Comparisons of surface meteorology and turbulent heat fluxes over the Atlantic: NWP model analyses versus moored buoy observations. J Clim 16:679–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thadathil P, Ghosh AK (1992) Surface layer temperature inversion in the Arabian Sea during winter. J Oceanogr 48(3):293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vinayachandran PN, Shetye SR (1991) The warm pool in the Indian Ocean. Proc Indian Acad Sci (Earth Planet Sci) 100(2):165–175Google Scholar
  50. Wang W, McPhaden MJ (2001) What is the mean seasonal cycle of surface heat flux in the equatorial Pacific? J Geophys Res 106:837–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weller RA, Anderson SP (1996) Surface meteorology and air–sea fluxes in the western equatorial Pacific warmpool during TOGA coupled ocean–atmosphere response experiment. J Clim 9:1959–1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weller RA, Baumgartner MF, Josey SA, Fisher AS, Kindle JC (1998) Atmospheric forcing in the Arabian Sea during 1994–1995 observations and comparisons with climatology models. Deep Sea Res 45B:1961–1999Google Scholar
  53. White GH (1995) An intercomparison of precipitation and surface fluxes from operational NWP analysis/forecast systems. WMO CAS/JSC working group on numerical experimentation report 22: WMO/TD-723, 33 ppGoogle Scholar
  54. Wijesekera H, Boyd TJ (2001) Upper ocean heat budget and freshwater budgets. In: Steele J, Thorpe S and Turekian K (eds) Encyclopedia of Ocean sciences, vol 6. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 3079–3083Google Scholar
  55. Xue H, Bane JM Jr, Goodman LM (1995) Modification of the Gulf stream through strong air–sea interaction in winter: observations and numerical simulations. J Phys Oceanogr 25:533–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yu L, Weller RA, Sun B (2004a) Improving latent and sensible heat flux estimates for the Atlantic Ocean (1988–99) by a synthesis approach. J Clim 17:373–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yu L, Weller RA, Sun B (2004b) Mean and variability of the WHOI daily latent and sensible heat fluxes at in situ flux measurement sites in the Atlantic Ocean. J Clim 17:2096–2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zeng X, Zhao M, Dickinson RE (1998) Intercomparison of bulk aerodynamical algorithms for the computation of sea surface fluxes using TOGA COARE and TAO data. J Clim 11:2628–2644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang GJ, McPhaden MJ (1995) The relationship between sea surface temperature and latent heat flux in the equatorial pacific. J Clim 8:589–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian National Centre for Ocean Information ServicesMinistry of Earth SciencesHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Space Physics LaboratoryVikram Sarabhai Space CentreThiruvanathapuramIndia

Personalised recommendations