Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics

, Volume 101, Issue 3–4, pp 111–126 | Cite as

On the combined use of satellite multispectral and radar polarimetric measurements to infer cloud microphysics

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Summary

The extensive availability of multispectral satellite observations and polarimetric ground radar measurements enhances the remote sensing capabilities in studying structure and dynamics of cloud systems at all relevant scales. We present here a combined approach to perform a detailed cloud vertical structure analysis, by means of MODIS VIS-NIR products and C-band polarimetric radar data. Satellite products include estimates of cloud optical thickness, cloud particles effective radius and cloud top phase, to be matched with the polarimetric hydrometeor 3D classification as obtained by a fuzzy logic algorithm. The problem of matching of the two datasets is discussed and the procedure is applied to three case studies that occurred in Northern Italy. Results are presented in terms of vertical hydrometeor profile and satellite derived microphysical cloud properties, showing the capability of the combined approach in the 3D rendering of cloud structures, with envisaged applications for precipitation studies and data assimilation in meteorological models.

Keywords

Radar Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer Effective Radius Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer Mesoscale Convective System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atlas, D 1990Radar in meteorology. Am Meteor SocLancaster PressLancaster, PA806Google Scholar
  2. Aydin, K, Seliga, TA, Balaji, V 1986Remote sensing of Hail with a dual-linear polarization radarJ Climate Appl Meteor2514751484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Capacci D, Battaglia A, Mantovani S, Porcù F, Conway B, Prodi F (2004) On the sensitivity of modis visible/1.6 micron channels to radar-measured ground precipitation. Proc. of 14th International Conference on Clouds and Precipitation, pp. 1048–51Google Scholar
  4. Chang, F-L, Li, Z 2002Estimating the vertical variation of cloud droplet effective radius using multispectral near-infrared satellite measurementsJ Geophys Res1074257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doviak, RJ, Zrnic, DS 1993Doppler radar and weather observationsAcademic PressSan Diego, CA562Google Scholar
  6. Galletti, M, Alberoni, PP, Levizzani, V, Celano, M 2005Assessment and tuning of the behavior of a microphysical characterization schemeAdv Geosci2145150Google Scholar
  7. Hall, M, Goddard, J, Cherry, S 1984Identification of hydrometeors and other targets by dual-polarization radarRadio Sci19132140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heymsfield, GM, Blackmer, RH 1988Satellite-observed characteristics of midwest severe thunderstorm anvilsMon Wea Rev11622002224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Illingworth, AJ, Zrnic, DS 1995Workshop on weather radar polarimetry for research and operational applicationsBull Amer Meteor Soc76555558Google Scholar
  10. King MD, Tsay S, Platnick SE, Wang M, Liou K (1997) Cloud Retrieval Algorithms for MODIS: optical thickness, effective particle radius, and thermodynamic phase. MODIS Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document No. ATBD-MOD-05 MOD06, 79 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Lensky, MI, Rosenfeld, D 1997Estimation of precipitation area and rain intensity based on the microphysical properties retrieved from NOAA AVHRR dataJ Appl Meteor36234242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lenskie, MI, Rosenfeld, D 2003Satellite-based insights into precipitation formation processes in continental and maritime convective clouds at nighttimeJ Appl Meteorol4212271233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Levizzani, V, Setvák, M 1996Multispectral, high-resolution satellite observations of plumes on top of convective stormsJ Atmos Sci53361369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maddox, RA 1980Mesoscale convective complexesBull Amer Meteor Soc6113471387Google Scholar
  15. Marshall, JS, Palmer, WMcK 1948The distribution raindrops with sizeJ Meteorol5165166Google Scholar
  16. Marzano, FS, Scaranari, D, Celano, M, Alberoni, PP, Vulpiani, G, Montopoli, M 2006Hydrometeor classification from dual-polarized weather radar: extending fuzzy logic from S-band to C-band dataAdv Geosci7109114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. May, PT, Keenan, TD, Zrnic, DS, Carey, LD, Rutledge, SA 1999Polarimetric radar measurements of tropical rain at a 5-cm wavelengthJ Appl Mete38750765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meischner, PF, Collier, C, Illingworth, A, Joss, J, Randeu, W 1997Advanced weather radar systems in Europe: the COST 75 actionBull Amer Mete Soc7814111430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morel, C, Senesi, S 2002A climatology of mesoscale convective systems ove Europe using satellite infrared imagery. I: MethodologyQ J Roy Met Soc12819531972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakajima, T, King, MD 1990Determination of the optical thickness and effective particle radius of clouds from reflected solar radiation measurements. Part I: TheoryJ Atmos Sci4718781893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Negri, AJ 1982Cloud-top structure of tornado storms on 10 April 1979 from rapid scan and stereo satellite observationsBull Am Met Soc6311511859Google Scholar
  22. Papa A, Porcù F, Battaglia A, Wang PK, Natali S, Prodi F (2004) Insights on the updraught extinction by satellite observations and cloud microphysical model. Proc. 14th Int. Conf. on Clouds and PrecipitationGoogle Scholar
  23. Seliga, TA, Bringi, VN 1976Potential use of radar differential reflectivity measurements at orthogonal polarizations for measuring precipitationJ Appl Meteor156976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spangenberg D, Minnis P, Shupe M, Uttal T, Poellot M (2005) Retrieval of cloud phase using the MODIS Data during the Mixed-phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. 15th ARM Science Team Meeting Proccedings, Mfg., Daytona Beach, FL, March 14–18Google Scholar
  25. Strabala, KI, Ackerman, SA, Menzel, WP 1994Cloud properties inferred from 8 to 12 micron dataJ Appl Meteor33212229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Straka JM, Zrnic DS (1993) An algorithm to deduce hydrometeor types and contents from multi-parameter radar data. Preprints, 26th Conf. Radar Meteor., Norman, OK, AMS, pp. 513–15Google Scholar
  27. Straka, JM, Zrnić, DS, Ryzhkov, AV 2000Bulk hydrometeor classification and quantification using polarimetric radar data: synthesis of relationsJ Appl Meteor3913411372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sun, J, Crook, NA 1997Dynamical and microphysical retrieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint: Part I. Model development and simulated data experimentsJ Atmos Sci5416421661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vivekanandan, J, Zrnic, DS, Ellis, SM, Oye, R, Ryzhkov, AV, Straka, J 1999Cloud microphysics retrieval using S-band dual-polarization radar measurementsBull Amer Met Soc80381388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zrnic, DS, Ryzhkov, AV 1999Polarimetry for weather surveillance RadarsBull Amer Met Soc80389406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zrnić, DS, Keenan, TD, Carey, LD, May, PT 2000Sensitivity analysis of polarimetric variables at a 5-cm wavelength in rainJ Appl Meteor3915141526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zrnić, DS, Ryzhkov, AV, Straka, JM, Liu, Y, Vivekanandan, J 2001Testing a procedure for automatic classification of hydrometeor typesJ Atmos Oceanic Technol18892913CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Celano
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. Porcù
    • 1
  • P. P. Alberoni
    • 2
    • 3
  • F. Prodi
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Università degli studi di Ferrara, Dipartimento di FisicaFerraraItaly
  2. 2.ARPA-SIMBolognaItaly
  3. 3.ISAC-CNRBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations