Validation of ECMWF and DWD model analyses with buoy measurements over the Norwegian Sea
- 82 Downloads
As part of the Lofote Cyclone experiment (Lofoten Zyklonen Experiment) 21 drift buoys were deployed in a 700 km × 400 km area of the Norwegian Sea situated to the west of the Lofote Islands. The buoys measured sea-level pressure (SLP), surface air temperature (SAT), and sea surface temperature (SST) at hourly intervals for a 6-month period from March to August 2005. This unique data set is used to validate the operational model analyses of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the German Weather Service [Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)]. Comparisons were performed in both time and space. Generally, biases are small and amount to 0.2 hPa for SLP and −0.2 K for SAT. Temporal correlations are higher than 0.99 for SLP and 0.93 for SAT. Spatial correlations as a measure of pattern coincidence are lower then for temporal correlations, but still amount to values higher than 0.97 for SLP and 0.76 for SAT on average. SST, which is externally prescribed and not a model variable, shows surprisingly large and persistent errors of up to 6 K for latitudes above 76°N. This points towards basic errors in the SST source for both models. Taking all comparisons (SLP, SAT, and SST) together, agreement is slightly worse for DWD than for ECMWF.
KeywordsLofote Island Difference Frequency Distribution Spatial RMSE
This research was founded by the German Science Foundation (DFG) under grant SFB 512 “Cyclones and the North Atlantic climate system”.
- Andersson A, Bakan S, Fennig K, Graßl H, Klepp CP, Schulz J (2007) Hamburg Ocean Atmosphere Parameters and Fluxes from Satellite Data—HOAPS-3—monthly mean. doi: 10.1594/WDCC/HOAPS3_MONTHLY. World Data Center for Climate, Hamburg
- Emery WJ (2002) Air–sea interaction/sea surface temperature. In: Holton JP, Curry JA, Pyle J (eds) Encyclopedia of atmospheric sciences. Academic, London, pp 100–109Google Scholar
- Eymard L, Weill A, Bourras D, Guerin C, Borge PL, Lefevre JM (2003) Use of ship mean data for validating model and satellite flux fields during the FETCH experiment. J Geophys Res 108(C3):FET 8–1–8–20Google Scholar
- Graßl H, Jost V, Kumar R, Schulz J, Bauer P, Schluessel P (2000) The Hamburg Ocean–Atmosphere Parameteres and Fluxes from Satellite Data (HOAPS): a climatological atlas of satellite-derived air-sea-interaction parameters over the oceans. Technical report 312, available at http://www.hoaps.org, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg
- Klepp CP, Bakan S, Graßl H (2005) Missing North Atlantic cyclonic precipitation in ECMWF numerical weather prediction and ERA-40 data detected through the satellite climatology HOAPS II. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 14(6)Google Scholar
- Makshtas A, Atkinson D, Kulakov M, Shutilin S, Krishfield R, Proshutinsky A (2007) Atmospheric forcing validation for modeling the central Arctic. Geophys Res Lett 34. doi: 10.1029/2007GL031078
- Persson A, Grazzini F (2005) User guide to ECMWF forecast products. Tech. Rep. Meteorological Bulletin M3.2, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather ForecastsGoogle Scholar
- Schrodin R (2002) Quarterly report of the German NWP system. Technical report. Part 2: description of the German NWP system, German Weather Service, available at http://www.dwd.de
- Tisler P, Vihma T, Brümmer B, Müller G (2008) Modelling of warm-air advection over Arctic sea ice. Tellus (in press), available at http://hirlam.fmi.fi/jakelu/vihma2008/
- Tsukernik M, Kindig DN, Serreze MC (2007) Characteristics of winter cyclone activity in the northern North Atlantic: insights from observations and regional modeling. J Geophys Res 112(D). doi: 10.1029/2006JD007184