Covariation bias in depression - a predictor of treatment response?
- 87 Downloads
Covariation bias, defined as an overestimation of the relationship between fear-relevant stimuli and aversive consequences, is a well-investigated cognitive bias in anxiety disorders. As patients with affective disorders also show biased information processing, the aim of the present study was to investigate whether depressed patients also display a covariation bias between negative stimuli and aversive consequences. Covariation estimates of 62 inpatients with a current severe depressive episode were assessed at admission (n = 31) or after 6 weeks of treatment (n = 31) and were compared in a between-group design with 31 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. All participants showed a covariation bias for the relationship between negative stimuli and aversive consequences. Moreover, covariation bias at admission was significantly associated with various clinician- and self-reported dimensional measures of treatment response assessed 6 weeks later (Global Assessment of Functioning, Clinical Global Impression Scale, and Beck Depression Inventory), i.e., patients with a stronger bias showed greater impairment after 6 weeks of treatment. Categorical analyses revealed that overall, treatment non-responders—but not responders—were characterized by a covariation bias. The naturalistic study design without standardized pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments is a central limitation. We conclude that the covariation bias may constitute a possible marker in the field of emotional information processing in the search for effective predictors of therapy outcome.
KeywordsCovariation bias Affective disorders Severe depressive episode Treatment response
This work was supported by a grant from the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF), University of Wuerzburg (N-258 to LH), and from the German Research Foundation DFG, SFB-TRR-58, projects B01 to PP and project B05, and DFG project 378414384 to JW.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed written consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Beck AT (1976) Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Fava M, Rush AJ, Alpert JE, Balasubramani GK, Wisniewski SR, Carmin CN, Biggs MM, Zisook S, Leuchter A, Howland R, Warden D, Trivedi MH (2008) Difference in treatment outcome in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry 165(3):342–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guy W (1976) Clinical global impressions. In: Guy W (ed) ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology (Revised). National Institut of Mental Health, Rockville, pp 217–221Google Scholar
- Hautzinger M, Bailer M, Worall H, Keller F (1994) Beck-Depressions-Inventar (BDI). Testhandbuch. 1 edn. Hans Huber, BernGoogle Scholar
- Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN (2005) International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-6. University of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
- Saß H, Wittchen HU, Zaudig M (2003) Diagnostisches und statistisches Manual psychischer Störungen DSM-IV-TR. Hogrefe, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
- Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC (1998) The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 59(Suppl 20):22–33 (quiz 34–57)PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE (1970) Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
- Wittchen HU, Zaudig M, Fydrich T (1997) SKID-I: Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV, Achse 1: psychische Störungen. Hogrefe, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
- Wittchen HU, Jacobi F, Rehm J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Jönsson B, Olesen J, Allgulander C, Alonso J, Faravelli C, Fratiglioni L, Jennum P, Lieb R, Maercker A, van Os J, Preisig M, Salvador-Carulla L, Simon R, Steinhausen HC (2011) The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 21(9):655–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar