Journal of Neural Transmission

, Volume 120, Issue 2, pp 335–338 | Cite as

Why antiplatelet treatment in spontaneous internal carotid dissection?

Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - CONy Pro/Con debate

Abstract

Spontaneous dissection of the internal carotid artery is a leading cause of stroke and TIA, particularly in young patients. The antithrombotic treatment with or without an interventional procedure is a unanimously accepted indication for the prevention of the ischemic events in these patients. Whether anticoagulants or antiplatelets as antithrombotics are a better option is a matter of debate. The authors, based on clinical and pathophysiological data in the published studies and their own experience argue in favour of antiplatelets in most cases, without excluding the need of anticoagulants in some cases, due to the lack of objective proofs for the superiority of anticoagulants in this pathology and at the same time, a better safety profile of antiplatelets. To have a clear-cut answer to this debate, a large comparative randomized clinical trial between the two types of treatment is desirable.

Keywords

Spontaneous internal carotid artery dissection Anticoagulants Antiplatelets Brain ischemic events 

References

  1. Brandt T, Orberk E, Weber R, Werner I, Busse O, Müller BT, Wigger F, Grau A, Grond-Ginsbach C, Hausser I (2001) Pathogenesis of cervical artery dissections: association with connective tissue abnormalities. Neurology 57:24–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coull BM, Williams LS, Goldstein LB, Meschia JF, Heitzman D, Chaturvedi S, Johnston KC, Starkman S, Morgenstern LB, Wilterdink JL, Levine SR, Saver JL (2002) Anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents in acute ischemic stroke: report of the Joint Stroke Guideline Development Committee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Stroke Association (a division of the American Heart Association). Stroke 33:1934–1942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Debette S, Leys D (2009) Cervical-artery dissections: predisposing factors, diagnosis, and outcome. Lancet Neurol 8:668–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dreier JP, Lurtzing F, Kappmeier M, Bohner G, Klingebiel R, Leistner S, Einhaupl KM, Schielke E, Valdueza JM (2004) Delayed occlusion after internal carotid artery dissection under heparin. Cerebrovasc Dis 18:296–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Engelter ST, Brandt T, Debette S, Caso V, Lichy C, Pezzini A, Abboud S, Bersano A, Dittrich R, Grond-Ginsbach C, Hausser I, Kloss M, Grau AJ, Tatlisumak T, Leys D, Lyrer PA, for the Cervical Artery Dissection in Ischemic Stroke Patients (CADISP) Study Group (2007) Antiplatelets versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection. Stroke 38:2605–2611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fluri F, Lyrer PA, Steck AJ, Engelter ST (2007) Internal carotid artery dissection with occlusion during heparin therapy. Swiss Arch Neurol Psychol 158:331–333Google Scholar
  7. Furie KL, Kasner SE, Adams RJ, Albers GW, Bush RL, Fagan SC, Halperin JL, Johnston SC, Katzan I, Kernan WN, Mitchell PH, Ovbiagele B, Palesch YY, Sacco RL, Schwamm LH, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Turan TN, Wentworth D, American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research (2011) Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 42:227–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Georgiadis D, Arnold M, von Buedingen HC, Valko P, Sarikaya H, Rousson V, Mattle HP, Bousser MG, Baumgartner RW (2009) Aspirin vs anticoagulation in carotid artery dissection: a study of 298 patients. Neurology 72:1810–1815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group (1997) The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet 349:1569–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jeon P, Kim BM, Kim DI, Shin YS, Kim KH, Park SI, Kim DJ, Suh SH (2010) Emergent self-expanding stent placement for acute intracranial or extracranial internal carotid artery dissection with significant hemodynamic insufficiency. Am J Neuroradiol 31:1529–1532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kadkhodayan Y, Jeck DT, Moran CJ, Derdeyn CP, Cross DT 3rd (2005) Angioplasty and stenting in carotid dissection with or without associated pseudoaneurysm. Am J Neuroradiol 26:2328–2335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kennedy F, Lanfranconi S, Hicks C, Reid J, Gompertz P, Price C, Kerry S, Norris J, Markus HS, on behalf of the CADISS Investigators (2012) Antiplatelets vs anticoagulation for dissection: CADISS nonrandomized arm and meta-analysis. Neurology 79:686–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lyrer Ph, Engelter S (2004) Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection. Stroke 35:613–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lyrer P, Engelter S (2010) Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD000255Google Scholar
  15. Menon R, Kerry S, Norris JW, Markus HS (2008) Treatment of cervical artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:1122–1127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Patel RR, Adam R, Maldjian C, Lincoln CM, Yuen A, Arneja A (2012) Cervical carotid artery dissection: current review of diagnosis and treatment. Cardiol Rev 20:145–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Perren F, Bocquet L, Saulnier F, Landis T, Sztajzel R (2006) Does anticoagulation harm in acute cervical artery dissection? Cerebrovasc Dis 21(Suppl 4):146Google Scholar
  18. Prabhakaran S, Khandji A, Wright CB (2006) Extracranial internal carotid artery dissection with unusual gadolinium enhancement. Neurology 67:536–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sacco RL, Adams R, Albers G, Alberts MJ, Benavente O, Furie K, Goldstein LB, Gorelick P, Halperin J, Harbaugh R, Johnston SC, Katzan I, Kelly-Hayes M, Kenton EJ, Marks M, Schwamm LH, Tomsick T, American Heart Association, American Stroke Association Council on Stroke, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Academy of Neurology (2006) Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Stroke 37:577–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yaghi S, Maalouf N, Keyrouz SG (2012) Cervical artery dissection: risk factors, treatment, and outcome; a 5-year experience from a tertiary care center. Int J Neurosci 122:40–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and PsychiatryUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”BucharestRomania
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyUniversity Emergency Hospital BucharestBucharestRomania
  3. 3.Department of Interventional RadiologyUniversity Emergency Hospital BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations