1 Hz rTMS preconditioned by tDCS over the primary motor cortex in Parkinson’s disease: effects on bradykinesia of arm and hand
- 494 Downloads
To investigate whether a period of 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over M1 preconditioned by tDCS improves bradykinesia of the upper limb in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Fifteen patients with PD performed index finger, hand tapping and horizontal pointing movements as well as reach-to-grasp movements with either hand before (baseline conditions) and after a period of 1 Hz rTMS preconditioned by (1) sham, (2) anodal or (3) cathodal tDCS over the primary motor cortex contralateral to the more affected body side. Movement kinematics was analysed using an ultrasound-based motion analyser at baseline, immediately after and 30 min after each stimulation session. Dopaminergic medication was continued. Compared to baseline, 1 Hz rTMS significantly increased the frequency of index finger and hand tapping as well as horizontal pointing movements performed with the contralateral hand. Movement frequency increased up to 40% over 30 min after cessation of the stimulation. Preconditioning with cathodal tDCS, but not with anodal tDCS, reduced the effectiveness of 1 Hz rTMS to improve tapping and pointing movements. There was no significant increase of movement frequencies of the ipsilateral hand induced by 1 Hz rTMS preconditioned by either tDCS session. Movement kinematics of reach-to-grasp movements were not significantly influenced by either stimulation session. In PD the beneficial effects of 1 Hz rTMS over the primary motor cortex on bradykinesia of simple finger, hand and pointing movements is reduced by preconditioning with cathodal tDCS, but not with anodal tDCS. Preconditioning with tDCS is a powerful tool to modulate the behavioural effect of 1 Hz rTMS over the primary motor cortex in PD.
KeywordsBasal ganglia Neuromodulation Brain plasticity M1
The study was supported by a stipend of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG NO737/4-1) to Dennis A. Nowak.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors has any financial disclosures regarding the present manuscript. The study was supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) to Dennis A. Nowak (NO 737/4-1).
- Fahn S, Elton RL, Members of the UPDRS Development Committee (1987) The Unified Parkinson’s disease Rating Scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne DB, Goldstein M (eds) Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease, vol. 2. McMillan Healthcare Information, Florham Park, pp 153–163, 293–304Google Scholar
- Helmich RC, Derikx LC, Bakker M, Scheeringa R, Bloem BR, Toni I (2009) Spatial remapping of cortico-striatal connectivity in Parkinson’s disease. Cereb Cortex [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- Jahanshahi M, Jenkins IH, Brown RG, Marsden CD, Passingham RE, Brooks DJ (1995) Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. I. An investigation using measurement of regional cerebral blood flow with PET and movement-related potentials in normal and Parkinson’s disease subjects. Brain 118:913–933CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Von Raison F, Ménard-Lefaucheur I, Cesaro P, Nguyen JP (2004) Improvement of motor performance and modulation of cortical excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol 115:2530–2541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siebner HR, Lang N, Rizzo V, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Lemon RN, Rothwell JC (2004) Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci 24:3379–3385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tergau F, Wassermann EM, Paulus W, Ziemann U (1999) Lack of clinical improvement in patients with Parkinson’s disease after low and high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol (Suppl) 51:281–288Google Scholar