Attention and amygdala activity: an fMRI study with spider pictures in spider phobia
- 758 Downloads
Facilitated detection of threatening visual cues is thought to be adaptive. In theory, detection of threat cues should activate the amygdala independently from allocation of attention. However, previous studies using emotional facial expressions as well as phobic cues yielded contradictory results. We used fMRI to examine whether the allocation of attention to components of superimposed spider and bird displays modulates amygdala activation. Nineteen spider-phobic women were instructed to identify either a moving or a stationary animal in briefly presented double-exposure displays. Amygdala activation followed a dose–response relationship: Compared to congruent neutral displays (two birds), amygdala activation was most pronounced in response to congruent phobic displays (two spiders) and less but still significant in response to mixed displays (spider and bird) when attention was focused on the phobic component. When attention was focused on the neutral component, mixed displays did not result in significant amygdala activation. This was confirmed in a significant parametric graduation of the amygdala activation in the order of congruent phobic displays, mixed displays with attention focus on the spider, mixed displays with focus on the bird and congruent neutral displays. These results challenge the notion that amygdala activation in response to briefly presented phobic cues is independent from attention.
KeywordsSpider phobia fMRI Attention Visual processing Emotion Amygdala
The pictures used to prepare the double-exposure pictures shown in this study were graciously provided by Wolfgang Miltner, Jena. This work was supported by the Research Group Emotion and Behavior which is sponsored by the German Research Society (DFG).
Conflict of interest statement
- Alpers GW (2008) Eye-catching: right hemisphere attentional bias for emotional pictures. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body. Brain Cogn 13:158–178Google Scholar
- Gerdes ABM, Alpers GW (2007) Toward and away from spiders: attentional engagement and disengagement in spider phobic patients. Psychophysiology 44:S35Google Scholar
- Gerdes ABM, Uhl G, Alpers GW (2008b) Spiders are special: Harmfulness does not explain why they are feared. Evol Hum Behav (in press)Google Scholar
- Goetsch VL, Taylor CB, Segall GM, Trabert W (1993) Positron emission tomography evaluation of behavior therapy for simple phobia. W Va J Psychol Res Pract 42–47Google Scholar
- Lang PJ (1980) Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications. In: Sidowski JB, Johnson JH, Williams TA (eds) Technology in mental health care delivery. Ablex, Norwood, pp 119–137Google Scholar
- Laux L, Glanzmann P, Schaffner P, Spielberger CD (1981) Das State-Trait-Angstinventar. Beltz Test Gesellschaft, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
- Mountz JM, Modell JG, Wilson MW, Curtis GC (1989) Positron emission tomographic evaluation of cerebral blood flow during state anxiety in simple phobia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46:501–504Google Scholar
- Öhman A (1997) As fast as the blink of an eye: evolutionary preparedness for preattentive processing of threat. In: Lang PJ, Simons RF, Balaban MT (eds) Attention and orienting: sensory and motivational processes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 165–184Google Scholar
- Schaller E, Gerdes A, Alpers GW (2006) Angst ungleich Ekel: Der Fragebogen zu Ekel und Angst vor Spinnen. In: Alpers GW, Krebs H, Mühlberger A, Weyers P, Pauli P (eds) Wissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 24. Symposium der Fachgruppe Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie. Pabst, Lengerich, p 105Google Scholar
- Wittchen H-U, Zaudig M, Fydrich T (1997) SKID—Strukturiertes klinisches Interview für DSM IV Achse I und II. Hogrefe, GöttingenGoogle Scholar