Advertisement

Subperiosteal versus subdural drainage after burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • 5 Accesses

Abstract

Background

The evidence for subperiosteal drainage (SPD) versus subdural drainage (SDD) in chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) remains controversial, and most surgeons prefer to use SDD over SPD. We aim to assess the latest evidence on the use of SPD compared to SDD in patients with CSDH undergoing burr hole evacuation.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search on topics that assesses the use of SPD compared to SDD in patients with CSDH up until November 2019 from PubMed, EuropePMC, Cochrane Central Database, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The primary outcome was recurrent CSDH, and the secondary outcomes were mortality, surgical morbidities, and modified Rankin Score (mRS).

Results

There were a total of 3241 subjects from 10 studies. SPD was shown to reduce recurrent CSDH (OR 0.66 [0.52, 0.84], p < 0.001; I2: 17%, p = 0.30) compared to SDD. Recurrent CSDH was lower in SPD group in subgroup analysis at 3-months (OR 0.63 [0.49, 0.81]; I2: 68%, p = 0.04) and 6-months (OR 0.66 [0.51, 0.85], p = 0.001; I2: 77%, p = 0.01) follow-up. However, there was no difference in CSDH recurrence upon subgroup analysis of RCTs. Similar mortality was demonstrated between SPD and SDD group (p = 0.13). The occurrence of parenchymal injury/new neurological deficit was significantly lower in SPD group (OR 0.26 [0.14, 0.51], p < 0.001; I2: 49%, p = 0.08). The rate of seizure, (p = 0.57), postoperative bleeding (p = 0.29), and infection (p = 0.25) were shown to be similar in both SPD and SDD group. Overall, the rate of surgical morbidity was significantly lower in SPD group (OR 0.61 [0.44, 0.85], p = 0.003; I2: 16%, p = 0.25). mRS at the end of follow-up was similar in SPD and SDD group (p = 0.12).

Conclusion

SPD was associated with less CSDH recurrence, but similar rate of mortality, seizures, postoperative bleeding, and infections compared to SDD. The rate of parenchymal injury/new neurological deficit was lower in the SPD group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Abouzari M, Rashidi A, Rezaii J et al (2007) The role of postoperative patient posture in the recurrence of traumatic chronic subdural hematoma after burr-hole surgery. Neurosurgery 61(4):794–797

  2. 2.

    Alcalá-Cerra G, Young AMH, Moscote-Salazar LR, Paternina-Caicedo Á (2014) Efficacy and safety of subdural drains after Burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematomas: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Neurosurg 82(6):1148–1157

  3. 3.

    Bellut D, Woernle CM, Burkhardt J-K et al (2012) Subdural drainage versus subperiosteal drainage in burr-hole trepanation for symptomatic chronic subdural hematomas. World Neurosurg 77(1):111–118

  4. 4.

    Glancz LJ, Poon MTC, Coulter IC et al (2019) Does drain position and duration influence outcomes in patients undergoing burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma? Lessons from a UK multicenter prospective cohort study. Neurosurgery 85(4):486–493

  5. 5.

    Häni L, Vulcu S, Branca M et al (2019) Subdural versus subgaleal drainage for chronic subdural hematomas: a post hoc analysis of the TOSCAN trial. J Neurosurg:1–9

  6. 6.

    Ishfaq A (2017) Outcome in chronic subdural hematoma after subdural vs. subgaleal drain. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 27(7):419–422

  7. 7.

    Jeong S, Kim SO, Won YS, Kwon YJ, Choi CS (2014) Clinical analysis of risk factors for recurrence in patients with chronic subdural hematoma undergoing burr hole trephination. Korean J Neurotrauma 10(1):15

  8. 8.

    Jung Y-G, Jung N-Y, Kim E (2015) Independent predictors for recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 57(4):266

  9. 9.

    Kaliaperumal C, Khalil A, Fenton E et al (2012) A prospective randomised study to compare the utility and outcomes of subdural and subperiosteal drains for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma. Acta Neurochir 154(11):2083–2088

  10. 10.

    Ko B-S, Lee J-K, Seo B-R et al (2008) Clinical analysis of risk factors related to recurrent chronic subdural hematoma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 43(1):11

  11. 11.

    Lucke-Wold BP, Nguyen L, Turner RC et al (2015) Traumatic brain injury and epilepsy: underlying mechanisms leading to seizure. Seizure 33:13–23

  12. 12.

    Nakaguchi H, Tanishima T, Yoshimasu N (2000) Relationship between drainage catheter location and postoperative recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma after burr-hole irrigation and closed-system drainage. J Neurosurg 93(5):791–795

  13. 13.

    Oral S (2015) Comparison of Subgaleal and subdural closed drainage system in surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. North Clin Istanbul 154(11):2083–2089

  14. 14.

    Santarius T, Kirkpatrick PJ, Ganesan D et al (2009) Use of drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374(9695):1067–1073

  15. 15.

    Sjåvik K, Bartek J, Sagberg LM et al (2017) Assessment of drainage techniques for evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: a consecutive population-based comparative cohort study. J Neurosurg:1–7

  16. 16.

    Soleman J, Kamenova M, Lutz K et al (2017) Drain insertion in chronic subdural hematoma: an international survey of practice. World Neurosurg 104:528–536

  17. 17.

    Soleman J, Lutz K, Schaedelin S et al (2019) Subperiosteal vs subdural drain after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma: a randomized clinical trial (cSDH-drain-trial). Neurosurgery 85(5):E825–E834

  18. 18.

    Chih AN, Hieng AW, Rahman NA, Abdullah JM (2017) Subperiosteal drainage versus subdural drainage in the management of chronic subdural hematoma (a comparative study). Malays J Med Sci 24(1):21–30

  19. 19.

    Weigel R (2003) Outcome of contemporary surgery for chronic subdural haematoma: evidence based review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74(7):937–943

  20. 20.

    Yang W, Huang J (2017) Chronic subdural hematoma. Neurosurg Clin N Am 28(2):205–210

  21. 21.

    Yu GJ, Han CZ, Zhang M, Zhuang HT, Jiang YG (2009) Prolonged drainage reduces the recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma. Br J Neurosurg 23(6):606–611

  22. 22.

    Zhang JJY, Wang S, Foo ASC et al (2019) Outcomes of subdural versus subperiosteal drain after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: a multicenter cohort study. World Neurosurg 131(5):e392–e401

Download references

Author information

R.P proposed and made the design for the study. R. P and H. D acquired the data and drafted the manuscript. R. P and H. D extracted, interpreted the available data, and performed extensive research on the topic. J.J provide critical revision to the manuscript. All aforementioned authors contributed to the writing of this manuscript. R. P performed the statistical analysis.

Correspondence to Raymond Pranata.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Comments

The aims of burr hole trepanation for chronic subdural hematoma are to release (most of) the blood which compresses the cerebral hemisphere(s), to allow further hematoma reabsorption by drainage, and to prevent hematoma recurrence. Furthermore, it is of paramount importance to not create any new or additional morbidity to the often elderly and frail patients. I started my training in a department where subdural drain (SDD) placement was standard of care. I then moved on to a department where both subperiosteal drains (SPD) and SDDs were placed for this indication, allowing me to compare complications and results of both techniques. In Zurich we practice SPD placement as standard of care. As this well-conducted systematic review illustrates, the risk of injury to the cerebral cortex is dramatically lower (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14–0.51, p < 0.001), no matter how careful one intends to insert the subdural drain. Moreover, the results in terms of hematoma clearance and reoperation are at least as good – if not better – for SPD compared to SDD. The results mirror the clinical experience I made during my training and provide great arguments in the on-going evidence-based discussion on how we should best treat our patients. To me, SPD are clearly preferred over SDD, following the bioethical maxim “primum non nocere.”

Martin N. Stienen

Zurich, Switzerland

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Brain trauma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pranata, R., Deka, H. & July, J. Subperiosteal versus subdural drainage after burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (2020) doi:10.1007/s00701-019-04208-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Subperiosteal
  • Subgaleal
  • Drainage
  • Subdural hematoma
  • Burr hole