Advertisement

Third ventricle floor bowing: a useful measurement to predict endoscopic third ventriculostomy success in infantile hydrocephalus

  • Qiguang Wang
  • Jian Cheng
  • Zhang Si
  • Qiang Li
  • Xuhui Hui
  • Yan JuEmail author
Original Article - Pediatric Neurosurgery
  • 22 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Pediatric Neurosurgery

Abstract

Background

Preoperative judgment who will benefit from endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in infantile hydrocephalus remains controversial and no sufficient clue exists. Although ETV success score (ETVSS) is a useful scale in predicting ETV success in hydrocephalus, its efficacy in infants younger than 1 year old has been limited. This study aimed to verify the efficacy of a newly defined sign, “third ventricle floor bowing (TVFB),” in predicting ETV success in infantile hydrocephalus for the first time and discuss the mechanism of this sign and its clinical meanings.

Methods

Between January 2013 and April 2018, hydrocephalic infants (age ≤ 12 months) with third ventricle floor bowing were treated endoscopically in the Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital. The medical records of these patients were reviewed. Additionally, we undertook a detailed review of the reported data on the treatment of infantile hydrocephalus with endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV).

Results

A total of 42 infants underwent ETV alone in our institution, with a median age of 7.3 ± 3.8 months. Common etiologies included postinfectious (26.2%), arachnoid cyst (14.3%), aqueductal stenosis (11.9%), and congenital condition (11.9%). The complications included seizure (2.4%), CSF leak (2.4%), and subdural effusion (2.4%). During the average follow-up of 21.7 ± 13.1 months, the ETV success rate predicted by third ventricle floor bowing (TVFB) was 71.4%, which was higher than 6-month success rate predicted by the ETVSS (52.3%). However, it was difficult to reach statistical significance (P = 0.072) due to the limited sample size and further studies with larger sample size were needed.

Conclusions

Our study suggests TVFB can serve as a useful method for selecting ETV candidates in infantile hydrocephalus preoperatively. And we speculate that good ventricle compliance and pressure difference between the ventricle and subarachnoid space are essential elements in ensuring ETV success.

Keywords

Infantile hydrocephalus ETV Endoscopic outcome 

Notes

Funding information

Sichuan Department of Science and Technology provided financial support in the form of Sichuan Science and Technology Support Program (No. 2018SZ0043).

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (ethics committee of West China Hospital) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Balthasar AJ, Kort H, Cornips EM, Beuls EA, Weber JW, Vles JS (2007) Analysis of the success and failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants less than 1 year of age. Child’s nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery 23:151–155.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-006-0219-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buxton N, Macarthur D, Mallucci C, Punt J, Vloeberghs M (1998) Neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients less than 1 year old. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:73–76.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000028693 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Costa Val JA, Scaldaferri PM, Furtado LM, de Souza BG (2012) Third ventriculostomy in infants younger than 1 year old. Child’s nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery 28:1233–1235.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1740-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dlouhy BJ, Capuano AW, Madhavan K, Torner JC, Greenlee JD (2012) Preoperative third ventricular bowing as a predictor of endoscopic third ventriculostomy success. J Neurosurg Pediatr 9:182–190.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.11.peds11495 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elgamal EA, El-Dawlatly AA, Murshid WR, El-Watidy SM, Jamjoom ZA (2011) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus in children younger than 1 year of age. Child’s nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery 27:111–116.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-010-1254-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Faggin R, Bernardo A, Stieg P, Perilongo G, d’Avella D (2009) Hydrocephalus in infants less than six months of age: effectiveness of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie 19:216–219.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1202282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fani L, de Jong TH, Dammers R, van Veelen ML (2013) Endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy in hydrocephalic children under 2 years of age: appropriate or not? A single-center retrospective cohort study. Child’s nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery 29:419–423.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1961-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foroughi M, Wong A, Steinbok P, Singhal A, Sargent MA, Cochrane DD (2011) Third ventricular shape: a predictor of endoscopic third ventriculostomy success in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:389–396.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.1.peds10461 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fritsch MJ, Kienke S, Ankermann T, Padoin M, Mehdorn HM (2005) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants. J Neurosurg 103:50–53.  https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2005.103.1.0050 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fritsch MJ, Mehdorn M (2002) Endoscopic intraventricular surgery for treatment of hydrocephalus and loculated CSF space in children less than one year of age. Pediatr Neurosurg 36:183–188.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000056055 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garcia LG, Lopez BR, Botella GI, Paez MD, da Rosa SP, Rius F, Sanchez MA (2012) Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score (ETVSS) predicting success in a series of 50 pediatric patients. Are the outcomes of our patients predictable? Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery 28:1157–1162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1836-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gianaris TJ, Nazar R, Middlebrook E, Gonda DD, Jea A, Fulkerson DH (2017) Failure of ETV in patients with the highest ETV success scores. J Neurosurg Pediatr 20:225–231.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.7.peds1655 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gorayeb RP, Cavalheiro S, Zymberg ST (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children younger than 1 year of age. J Neurosurg 100:427–429.  https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2004.100.5.0427 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    He Z, An C, Zhang X, He X, Li Q (2015) The efficacy analysis of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infantile hydrocephalus. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 57:119–122.  https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.57.2.119 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hopf NJ, Grunert P, Fries G, Resch KD, Perneczky A (1999) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures. Neurosurgery 44:795–804 discussion 804-796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Javadpour M, Mallucci C, Brodbelt A, Golash A, May P (2001) The impact of endoscopic third ventriculostomy on the management of newly diagnosed hydrocephalus in infants. Pediatr Neurosurg 35:131–135.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000050406 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jernigan SC, Berry JG, Graham DA, Goumnerova L (2014) The comparative effectiveness of ventricular shunt placement versus endoscopic third ventriculostomy for initial treatment of hydrocephalus in infants. J Neurosurg Pediatr 13:295–300.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.11.peds13138 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kehler U, Regelsberger J, Gliemroth J, Westphal M (2006) Outcome prediction of third ventriculostomy: a proposed hydrocephalus grading system. Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN 49:238–243.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-950382 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koch D, Wagner W (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants of less than 1 year of age: which factors influence the outcome? Child’s nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery 20:405–411.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-004-0958-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koch-Wiewrodt D, Wagner W (2006) Success and failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in young infants: are there different age distributions? Child’s nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery 22:1537–1541.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-006-0191-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Kestle JR, Mallucci CL, Sgouros S, Constantini S, Canadian Pediatric Neurosurgery Study G (2010) Predicting who will benefit from endoscopic third ventriculostomy compared with shunt insertion in childhood hydrocephalus using the ETV Success Score. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6:310–315.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.8.PEDS103 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Mallucci CL, Sgouros S, Roth J, Constantini S (2009) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. J Pediatr 155:254–259.e251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.02.048 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kulkarni AV, Riva-Cambrin J, Browd SR, Drake JM, Holubkov R, Kestle JR, Limbrick DD, Rozzelle CJ, Simon TD, Tamber MS, Wellons JC 3rd, Whitehead WE, Hydrocephalus Clinical Research N (2014) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy and choroid plexus cauterization in infants with hydrocephalus: a retrospective Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 14:224–229.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.6.PEDS13492 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kulkarni AV, Sgouros S, Constantini S, Investigators I (2016) International Infant Hydrocephalus Study: initial results of a prospective, multicenter comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and shunt for infant hydrocephalus. Child’s nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery 32:1039–1048.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3095-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lipina R, Reguli S, Dolezilova V, Kuncikova M, Podesvova H (2008) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus in children younger than 6 months of age: is it a first-choice method? Child’s nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery 24:1021–1027.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-008-0616-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Madsen PJ, Mallela AN, Hudgins ED, Storm PB, Heuer GG, Stein SC (2018) The effect and evolution of patient selection on outcomes in endoscopic third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus: a large-scale review of the literature. J Neurol Sci 385:185–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2017.12.025 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ogiwara H, Dipatri AJ Jr, Alden TD, Bowman RM, Tomita T (2010) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus in children younger than 6 months of age. Child’s nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery 26:343–347.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-009-1019-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stone SS, Warf BC (2014) Combined endoscopic third ventriculostomy and choroid plexus cauterization as primary treatment for infant hydrocephalus: a prospective North American series. J Neurosurg Pediatr 14:439–446.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.7.peds14152 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sufianov AA, Sufianova GZ, Iakimov IA (2010) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients younger than 2 years: outcome analysis of 41 hydrocephalus cases. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5:392–401.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.11.PEDS09197 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang Q, Hui X, Li Q, Ju Y (2018) Letter to the Editor. Preoperative third ventricle shape and ETV Journal of neurosurgery Pediatrics 21:542–543.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.10.PEDS17534 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Warf BC (2005) Comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy alone and combined with choroid plexus cauterization in infants younger than 1 year of age: a prospective study in 550 African children. J Neurosurg 103:475–481.  https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2005.103.6.0475 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Warf BC, Tracy S, Mugamba J (2012) Long-term outcome for endoscopic third ventriculostomy alone or in combination with choroid plexus cauterization for congenital aqueductal stenosis in African infants. J Neurosurg Pediatr 10:108–111.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.4.PEDS1253 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zohdi AZ, El Damaty AM, Aly KB, El Refaee EA (2013) Success rate of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants below six months of age with congenital obstructive hydrocephalus (a preliminary study of eight cases). Asian journal of neurosurgery 8:147–152.  https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.121686 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zucchelli M, Galassi E (2018) Higher failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants: the “distensible” skull is the culprit. Pediatr Neurosurg 53:163–166.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000487090 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations