X-ray exposure in odontoid screwing for Anderson type II fracture: comparison between O-arm and C-arm-assisted procedures
- 26 Downloads
Since the odontoid fractures become increasingly common in the aging population, technical improvements are even more needed. The odontoid screwing has been progressively preferred by many surgeons in type II fractures according to the Anderson-D’Alonzo classification system. However, X-ray exposure remains an issue for surgeons and OR staff members. The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of using the O-Arm for odontoid screwing comparing the radiation exposure to the standard C-Arm.
Patients consequently referred to our center for odontoid type II fractures, from January 2018 to April 2019, eligible for odontoid screwing were enrolled in the present study. They were operated on using either C-Arm or O-Arm-assisted procedures. The surgical duration, number of acquisitions, global X-ray exposure for the OR staff and patients, and screw placement accuracy were evaluated.
No differences in terms of patients’ demographical characteristics and surgical duration were reported. The number of acquisitions, intraoperative and global X-ray dose, for the OR staff and patients, was lower in O-Arm-assisted procedures (p < 0.05). The screws were all well positioned.
Since the surgical outcomes seem to be similar using the O-Arm for odontoid screwing, the lower X-ray exposure and the possibility for checking the instrumentation positioning with 3D reconstructions before leaving the OR should be considered.
KeywordsOdontoid screwing CVJ X-ray exposure Patient’s safety Minimally invasive spine surgery Intraoperative imaging
Anterior cervical approach for dens screwing
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.Dabaghi Richerand A, Christodoulou E, Li Y, Caird MS, Jong N, Farley FA (2016) Comparison of effective dose of radiation during pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography navigation versus fluoroscopy in children with spinal deformities. J Pediatr Orthop 36(5):530–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Ricciardi L, Chaichana KL, Cardia A, Stifano V, Rossini Z, Olivi A, Sturiale CL (2019) The exoscope in neurosurgery: an innovative “point of view”. A systematic review of the technical, surgical and educational aspects. World Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Yuan S, Wei B, Tian Y, Yan J, Xu W, Wang L, Liu X (2018) The comparison of clinical outcome of fresh type II odontoid fracture treatment between anterior cannulated screws fixation and posterior instrumentation of C1-2 without fusion: a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg 13(1):3CrossRefGoogle Scholar