Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 161, Issue 6, pp 1079–1083 | Cite as

How I do it? Oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L5S1(OLIF51)

  • Jin-Sung KimEmail author
  • Sagar B. Sharma
How I Do it - Spine degenerative
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Spine degenerative

Abstract

Background

OLIF51 retains the advantages of traditional ALIF procedure with good fusion rates and improvement in radiographic parameters and reduces its drawbacks. It has the added advantage of being a minimal access technique.

Methods

Preoperative analysis of the vascular anatomy using CT angiography is mandatory. OLIF51 is done in right lateral position using specialized retractor blades and Thompson retractor system. The procedure is similar to OLIF at other levels except for the differences described here. The instruments are specialized for OLIF at L5S1.

Conclusion

OLIF51 provides an excellent alternative to traditional ALIF.

Keywords

OLIF Oblique lumbar interbody fusion OLIF51 Ante-psoas approach ALIF Lumbar interbody fusion Minimal invasive spine Spondylolisthesis Spinal stenosis Degenerative spine 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (name of institute/committee) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Supplementary material

Video: A description of the technique is provided in the video (WMV 34819 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Chang J, Kim JS, Jo H (2017) Ventral dural injury after oblique lumbar interbody fusion. World Neurosurg 98:881–8e1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drake RL, Vogl AW, Mitchell AW (2014) Abdomen. In: Gray’s Anatomy for Student, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier, Philadephia, pp 280–291Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fung DA, Molinares DM, Davis TT (2014) Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs: an MRI study. Spine J 14(11):S10–S11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jin C, Jaiswal MS, Jeun SS, Ryu KS, Hur JW, Kim JS (2018) Outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease in patients under or over 65 years of age. J Orthop Surg Res 13(1):38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim JS, Kim DH, Lee SH, Park CK, Hwang JH, Cheh G et al (2010) Comparison study of the instrumented circumferential fusion with instrumented anterior lumbar interbody fusion as a surgical procedure for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. World Neurosurg 73(5):565–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee HJ, Kim JS, Ryu KS, Park CK (2017) Ureter injury as a complication of oblique lumbar interbody fusion. World Neurosurg 102:693–6e7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Daly D, Rao PJ, Lennox A (2015) Approach-related complications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: results of a combined spine and vascular surgical team. Global Spine J 6(2):147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Molloy S, Butler JS, Benton A, Malhotra K, Selvadurai S, Agu O (2016) A new extensile anterolateral retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion from L1 to S1: a prospective series with clinical outcomes. Spine J 16(6):786–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woods KR, Billys JB, Hynes RA (2017) Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1–L5 (OLIF25) and at L5–S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates. Spine J 17(4):545–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zairi F, Sunna TP, Westwick HJ, Weil AG, Wang Z, Boubez G, Shedid D (2017) Mini-open oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach for multi-level discectomy and fusion involving L5–S1: preliminary experience. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(2):295–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryThe Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s HospitalSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations