Association between extracranial internal carotid artery tortuosity and thromboembolic complications during coil embolization of anterior circulation ruptured aneurysms
- 63 Downloads
The most frequent neurological complication during coil embolization of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm is a thromboembolic event. The association between the tortuosity of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and thromboembolic events (TEEs) during coil embolization of ruptured cerebral aneurysms remains unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the association between extracranial ICA tortuosity and thromboembolic complications during coil embolization of anterior circulation ruptured aneurysms.
A cohort of 57 patients with 57 anterior circulation ruptured aneurysms who underwent endovascular embolization at a single institution was retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into two groups, those who experienced TEEs and those who did not that were compared and analyzed based on patient baseline characteristics, procedural factors, and anatomical factors including those of aneurysms and extracranial ICA tortuosity. The anatomical factors of the aneurysms included maximum dome size, neck width, dome-to-neck ratio, and dome-to-neck aspect ratio. Extracranial ICA angles in the proximal and distal curvature were evaluated as ICA tortuosity.
Three of the 57 patients were excluded because of unavailability of data regarding ICA tortuosity; 54 patients were finally evaluated. TEEs occurred in six patients with five anterior cerebral and one internal carotid aneurysms. The extracranial distal ICA angle was significantly larger in patients with TEEs than in those without. Procedural factors and anatomical factors of the aneurysms were not associated with TEEs.
Extracranial ICA tortuosity was significantly associated with an increased incidence of thromboembolic events during endovascular coiling of anterior circulation ruptured aneurysms.
KeywordsAneurysm Coil embolization Extracranial Internal carotid artery
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 3.Fukuda H, Handa A, Koyanagi M, Yoshida K, Lo BW, Yamagata S (2015) Endovascular therapy for ruptured cerebral aneurysms in the elderly: poor accessibility of the guiding catheter and use of local anesthesia as the predictors of procedure-related rupture. Neurosurgery 77:544–552; discussion 552. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000874 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Muller MD, Ahlhelm FJ, von Hessling A, Doig D, Nederkoorn PJ, Macdonald S, Lyrer PA, van der Lugt A, Hendrikse J, Stippich C, van der Worp HB, Richards T, Brown MM, Engelter ST, Bonati LH (2017) Vascular anatomy predicts the risk of cerebral ischemia in patients randomized to carotid stenting versus endarterectomy. Stroke 48:1285–1292. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ogasawara K, Suga Y, Sasaki M, Chida K, Kobayashi M, Yoshida K, Otawara Y, Ogawa A (2008) Intraoperative microemboli and low middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity are additive in predicting development of cerebral ischemic events after carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 39:3088–3091. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.511360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Park HK, Horowitz M, Jungreis C, Genevro J, Koebbe C, Levy E, Kassam A (2005) Periprocedural morbidity and mortality associated with endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:506–514Google Scholar
- 11.Ries T, Buhk JH, Kucinski T, Goebell E, Grzyska U, Zeumer H, Fiehler J (2006) Intravenous administration of acetylsalicylic acid during endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms reduces the rate of thromboembolic events. Stroke 37:1816–1821. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000226933.44962.a6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar