Advertisement

Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes after surgical reduction with fixation or halo-vest immobilization for treating unstable atlas fractures

  • Moon Kyu Kim
  • Jun Jae ShinEmail author
Original Article - Spine - Other
  • 33 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Spine - Other

Abstract

Background

Unstable atlas fractures with concomitant transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) injury may be conservatively managed by halo-vest immobilization (HVI) or surgically treated by various fixation techniques. Many surgeons prefer surgical management due to complications, nonunion, and further dislocations with HVI. There are no comparative studies on surgical and nonsurgical management of unstable atlas fractures. We retrospectively assessed the radiological and clinical outcomes of surgical reduction with fixation vs. non-operative treatments for unstable atlas fractures with TAL rupture.

Methods

We analyzed records of 24 patients (15 men, 9 women; mean age, 48.3 years) with at least 1 year of follow-up. They underwent HVI or surgical reduction with fixation for unstable atlas fracture combined with TAL injury. Clinical outcomes, including neck visual analog scale and neck disability index (NDI), and radiological measurements, including degree of fracture displacement, atlantodental interval (ADI), range of motion (ROM), cervical alignment, fusion rate, and time-to-fusion, were assessed.

Results

Of the 24 patients, 13 were treated by surgical reduction with fixation (C1 lateral mass screw-C2 pedicle screw with a cross-link) and 11 by HVI. A significant reduction in lateral displacement of fractured lateral masses was identified in surgical reduction with fixation (3.21 ± 1.21 mm) compared with HVI (0.97 ± 2.69 mm). The mean reduction in ADI was 1.47 ± 1.08 mm with surgical fixation and 0.66 ± 1.02 mm with HVI. The bony rate and time-to-fusion were 100% and 14.91 ± 3.9 weeks with surgical reduction, and 72.7% and 22.31 ± 10.85 weeks with HVI. The postoperative neck pain relief and NDI after surgical fixation were higher than those after HVI.

Conclusions

Compared with HVI, surgical reduction with fixation reduces fractured lateral mass displacements, increases fusion rate, and reduces time-to-fusion while maintaining cervical curvature and improving neck pain and daily activities.

Keywords

Atlas fracture Cervical trauma Halo-vest Jefferson fracture Surgery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Hyun Kyung Park, Ph.D., for her contributions to drafting the manuscript and revising it for important intellectual content.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All human and animal studies were approved by the appropriate ethics committee and were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Abeloos L, De Witte O, Walsdorff M, Delpierre I, Bruneau M (2011) Posterior osteosynthesis of the atlas for nonconsolidated Jefferson fractures: a new surgical technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E1360–E1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ames CP, Acosta F, Nottmeier E (2005) Novel treatment of basilar invagination resulting from an untreated C-1 fracture associated with transverse ligament avulsion. Case report and description of surgical technique. J Neurosurg Spine 2:83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baek SH, Yoo SH, Cho KR, Shin JJ (2018) Cerebellar infarction after posterior direct reduction and fixation to treat an unstable Jefferson fracture: a case report. Acta Neurochir 160:471–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bransford R, Chapman JR, Bellabarba C (2011) Primary internal fixation of unilateral C1 lateral mass sagittal split fractures: a series of 3 cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chun DH, Yoon DH, Kim KN, Yi S, Shin DA, Ha Y (2018) Biomechanical comparison of four different atlantoaxial posterior fixation constructs in adults: a finite element study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:E891–E897Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fielding JW, Cochran G, Lawsing JF 3rd, Hohl M (1974) Tears of the transverse ligament of the atlas. A clinical and biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1683–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gumpert R, Poglitsch T, Krassnig R, Pranzl R, Puchwein P (2017) Reduction and ring fixation of instable C1 fractures with monoaxial pedicle screws. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:1253–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harms J, Melcher RP (2001) Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2467–2471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haus BM, Harris MB (2008) Case report: nonoperative treatment of an unstable Jefferson fracture using a cervical collar. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1257–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    He B, Yan L, Zhao Q, Chang Z, Hao D (2014) Self-designed posterior atlas polyaxial lateral mass screw-plate fixation for unstable atlas fracture. Spine J 14:2892–2896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hein C, Richter HP, Rath SA (2002) Atlantoaxial screw fixation for the treatment of isolated and combined unstable Jefferson fractures - experiences with 8 patients. Acta Neurochir 144:1187–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heller JG, Viroslav S, Hudson T (1993) Jefferson fractures: the role of magnification artifact in assessing transverse ligament integrity. J Spinal Disord 6:392–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hioki A, Miyamoto K, Inoue T, Hosoe H, Shinoda J, Iwama T, Shimizu K (2012) Successful antibiotic treatment for subdural empyema and seizure due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a complication of halo orthosis usage: a case report. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 22(Suppl 1):25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hu Y, Xu RM, Albert TJ, Vaccoro AR, Zhao HY, Ma WH, Gu YJ, Yuan ZS (2014) Function-preserving reduction and fixation of unstable Jefferson fractures using a C1 posterior limited construct. J Spinal Disord Tech 27:E219–E225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim SK, Shin JJ, Kim TH, Shin HS, Hwang YS, Park SK (2011) Clinical outcomes of halo-vest immobilization and surgical fusion of odontoid fractures. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 50:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Landells CD, Van Peteghem PK (1988) Fractures of the atlas: classification, treatment and morbidity. Spine 13:450–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levine AM, Edwards CC (1991) Fractures of the atlas. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:680–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Longo UG, Denaro L, Campi S, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2010) Upper cervical spine injuries: indications and limits of the conservative management in halo vest. A systematic review of efficacy and safety. Injury 41:1127–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maak TG, Tominaga Y, Panjabi MM, Ivancic PC (2006) Alar, transverse, and apical ligament strain due to head-turned rear impact. Spine 31:632–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Menendez JA, Wright NM (2007) Techniques of posterior C1-C2 stabilization. Neurosurgery 60:S103–S111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mirvis SE (1998) How much lateral atlantodental interval asymmetry and atlantoaxial lateral mass asymmetry is acceptable on an open-mouth odontoid radiograph, and when is additional investigation necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1106–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oda T, Panjabi MM, Crisco JJ 3rd, Oxland TR, Katz L, Nolte LP (1991) Experimental study of atlas injuries. II. Relevance to clinical diagnosis and treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:S466–S473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oshima K, Sakaura H, Iwasaki M, Nakura A, Fujii R, Yoshikawa H (2011) Repeated vertebrobasilar thromboembolism in a patient with severe upper cervical instability because of rheumatoid arthritis. Spine J 11:e1–e5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Payer M, Luzi M, Tessitore E (2009) Posterior atlanto-axial fixation with polyaxial C1 lateral mass screws and C2 pars screws. Acta Neurochir 151:223–229 discussion 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rojas CA, Bertozzi JC, Martinez CR, Whitlow J (2007) Reassessment of the craniocervical junction: normal values on CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:1819–1823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ruf M, Melcher R, Harms J (2004) Transoral reduction and osteosynthesis C1 as a function-preserving option in the treatment of unstable Jefferson fractures. Spine 29:823–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shatsky J, Bellabarba C, Nguyen Q, Bransford RJ (2016) A retrospective review of fixation of C1 ring fractures--does the transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) really matter? Spine J 16:372–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spence KF Jr, Decker S, Sell KW (1970) Bursting atlantal fracture associated with rupture of the transverse ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:543–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tay SY, Li CW, Ko CH, Chan WP (2018) A nonsurgical solution: Jefferson (burst) fracture. Am J Med 131:1061–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    White AA 3rd, Panjabi MM (1978) The clinical biomechanics of the occipitoatlantoaxial complex. Orthop Clin North Am 9:867–878Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurosurgery, Sanggye Paik HospitalInje University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations