Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 161, Issue 1, pp 161–169 | Cite as

Mathematical skills in children with pilocytic astrocytoma

  • Silvia Benavides-VarelaEmail author
  • Riccardina Lorusso
  • Valentina Baro
  • Luca Denaro
  • Nancy Estévez-Pérez
  • Daniela Lucangeli
  • Domenico D’Avella
  • Carlo Semenza
Original Article - Pediatric Neurosurgery
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Pediatric Neurosurgery



Pediatric patients with circumscribed cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) tumors generally perform within the normal range on neuropsychological tests after a complete tumor resection. The outcome in academically relevant abilities such as mathematics, which in adults involve some cerebellar functions, is however much less understood. The aim of this study is to retrospectively investigate the neuroplasticity of mathematical skills and associated cognitive functions following cerebellar resection of PA in pediatric patients.


Twenty-two children (mean age = 11.2 + 1.8), including 11 PA patients (females = 6) and 11 healthy controls (females = 6), were administered a battery of mathematical (MaT) and neuropsychological tests. Single-case statistical analyses were carried out (Crawford’s t) as well as between-group comparisons (Wilcoxon test). Spearman correlations between MaT and neuropsychological tests were calculated.


Thirty-six percent of the patients showed difficulties in some mathematical tasks, 50% of them within a broader cognitive deficit. Verbal working memory was associated with MaT performance both in patients and controls while, crucially, visuospatial memory, and visual-motor integration were associated with MaT in patients only. Among patients, MaT correlated negatively with tumor size and positively with the interval surgery test.


The results evince an overall recovery of mathematical abilities despite PA in the majority of patients. This functional reestablishment is supported by visuospatial and visuomotor integration functions that contribute to set up emerging mathematical skills in these patients. Higher levels of compensation are found in more developed tumors as compared to smaller ones.


Low-grade pilocytic astrocytoma Surgical resection Cerebellum Neuropsychological sequelae Mathematical performance 



We wish to thank Laura Milanese for her valuable assistance on the recruitment of patients. Our gratitude also goes to the parents of all the children for their participation.


This study was funded by the University of Padua (Grant Number: STPD11B88HM). The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

701_2018_3744_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (33 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 32 kb)


  1. 1.
    Aarsen FK, Van Dongen HR, Paquier PF, Van Mourik M, Catsman-Berrevoets CE (2004) Long-term sequelae in children after cerebellar astrocytoma surgery. Neurology 62(8):1311–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aarsen FK, Paquier PF, Arts WF, Van Veelen ML, Michiels E, Lequin M, Catsman-Berrevoets CE (2009) Cognitive deficits and predictors 3 years after diagnosis of a pilocytic astrocytoma in childhood. J Clin Oncol 27(21):3526–3532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arsalidou M, Taylor MJ (2011) Is 2+2=4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations. Neuroimage 54(3):2382–2393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnhardt C, Borsting E, Deland P, Pham N, Vu T (2005) Relationship between visual-motor integration and spatial organization of written language and math. Optom Vis Sci 82(2):138–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benavides-Varela S, Burgio F, Meneghello F, De Marco M, Arcara G, Rigon J, Semenza C (2015) Anatomical substrates and neurocognitive predictors of daily numerical abilities in mild cognitive impairment. Cortex 71:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benavides-Varela S, Butterworth B, Burgio F, Arcara G, Lucangeli D, Semenza C (2016) Numerical activities and information learned at home link to the exact numeracy skills in 5–6 years-old children. Front Psychol 7Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bisiacchi PS, Cendron M, Gugliotta M et al (2005) BVN 5–11. Batteria di valutazione neuropsicologica per l'età evolutiva. Centro studi EricksonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burgio F, Benavides-Varela S, Arcara G, Trevisson E, Frizziero D, Clementi M, Semenza C (2017) Numerical activities of daily living in adults with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Intellect Disabil Res 61(11):1069–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang SM, Parney IF, McDermott M, Barker FG, Schmidt MH, Huang W, Sloan AE (2003) Perioperative complications and neurological outcomes of first and second craniotomies among patients enrolled in the glioma outcome project. J Neurosurg 98:1175–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH (2002) Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia 40:1196–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daszkiewicz P, Maryniak A, Roszkowski M et al (2009) Long-term functional outcome of surgical treatment of juvenile pilocytic astrocytoma of the cerebellum in children. Childs Nerv Syst 25:855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farghaly WM, Ahmed MA, El-Tallawy HN et al (2018) Construction of an Arabic computerized battery for cognitive rehabilitation of children with specific learning disabilities. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 14:2123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Friso-van den Bos I, Van der Ven SHG, Kroesbergen EH, Van Luit JEH (2013) Working memory and mathematics in primary school children: a meta-analysis. Educ Res Rev 10:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Geary DC (1993) Mathematical disabilities: cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Psychol Bull 114(2):345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gupta N, Banerjee A, Haas-Kogan D (2004) Pediatric CNS tumors. Springer-Verlag, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kirschen MP, DavisRatner MS, Milner MW, Chen SH, Schraedley Desmond P, Fisher PG, Desmond JE (2008) Verbal memory impairments in children after cerebellar tumor resection. Behav Neurol 20:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Konczak J, Schoch B, Dimitrova A, Gizewski E, Timmann D (2005) Functional recovery of children and adolescents after cerebellar tumor resection. Brain 128:1428–1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lis A, Di Nuovo S (1982) Test della grande figura complessa di Rey traduzione italiana. Organizzazioni Speciali, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mammarella IC, Toso C, Pazzaglia F, Cornoldi C (2008) BVS-Corsi. Batteria per la valutazione della memoria visiva e spaziale. Con CD-ROM. Edizioni EricksonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morgan AT, Liegeois F, Liederkerke C, Vogel AP, Hayward R, Harkness W et al (2011) Role of cerebellum in fine speech control in childhood: persistent dysarthria after surgical treatment for posterior fossa tumour. Brain Lang 117(2):69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Noone AM, Howlader N, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2015, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, based on November 2017 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2018.
  22. 22.
    Pieters S, Desoete A, Roeyers H, Vanderswalmen R, Van Waelvelde H (2012) Behind mathematical learning disabilities: what about visual perception and motor skills? Learn Individ Differ 22(4):498–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Preda C (2015) VMI Developmental test of visual-motor integration: Il Beery-Buktenica con i test supplementari di percezione visiva e coordinazione motoria: manuale. Organizzazioni Speciali, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reigosa-Crespo V, Valdés-Sosa M, Butterworth B, Estévez N, Rodríguez M, Santos E, Lage A (2012) Basic numerical capacities and prevalence of developmental dyscalculia: the Havana survey. Dev Psychol 48(1):123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scarpa P, Piazzini A, Pesenti G et al (2006) Italian neuropsychological instruments to assess memory, attention and frontal functions for developmental age. Neurol Sci 27(6):381–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Solan HA, Mozlin R, Rumpf DA (1985) The relationship of perceptual-motor development to learning readiness in kindergarten a multivariate analysis. J Learn Disabil 18(6):337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sortor JM, Kulp MT (2003) Are the results of the Beery-Buktenica developmental test of visual-motor integration and its subtests related to achievement test scores? Optom Vis Sci 80(11):758–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Steinlin M, Imfeld S, Zulauf P, Boltshauser E, Lovblad KO, Ridolfi-Luthy A, Perrig W, Kaufmann F (2003) Neuropsychological long term sequelae after posterior fossa tumour resection during childhood. Brain 126:1998–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD (2009) Functional topography in human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage 44(2):489–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wechsler D (2012) Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence—fourth edition. Pearson Assessments, San AntonioGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Benavides-Varela
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Riccardina Lorusso
    • 4
    • 5
  • Valentina Baro
    • 4
  • Luca Denaro
    • 4
  • Nancy Estévez-Pérez
    • 6
  • Daniela Lucangeli
    • 1
  • Domenico D’Avella
    • 4
  • Carlo Semenza
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Developmental Psychology and SocializationUniversity of PadovaPadovaItaly
  2. 2.Department of General PsychologyUniversity of PadovaPadovaItaly
  3. 3.IRCCS San Camillo Hospital FoundationNeuropsychology UnitVeniceItaly
  4. 4.Department of Neuroscience (Padova Neuroscience Center)University of PadovaPadovaItaly
  5. 5.Department of MedicineUniversity of PadovaPadovaItaly
  6. 6.Brain Development LaboratoryCuban Neurosciences CentreHavanaCuba

Personalised recommendations