Radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy for cavernous sinus meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Radiosurgery (RS) and fractionated radiotherapy (FRT) are part of the therapeutic armamentarium for the management of cavernous sinus meningiomas. We propose a systematic review of the local tumor control and clinical outcomes after monofractionated radiosurgical treatment, including gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and linear accelerator (Linac RS), or fractionated radiotherapy.
Materials and Methods
The current review and meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. We performed a search in PubMed, Embase, and Medline based on the following mesh terms, used alone or in diverse combinations, in both title and abstract: “cavernous sinus,” “meningioma,” “radiosurgery,” “gamma knife,” “linac,” “cyberknife,” and “radiotherapy”. We screened 425 studies. We selected 36 studies, matching all selection criteria: 24 for GK, 5 for Linac, and 7 for FRT.
Were included 2817 patients (GKRS, n = 2047, LinacRS, n = 350, FRT, n = 420). Half of patients benefited from upfront RS or FRT; the other half benefited from adjuvant RS or FRT (combined approach or tumor recurrence). The mean gross target volume (GTV) was smaller for RS as compared to FRT (p = 0.07). The median marginal doses were 13.9 Gy (range, 11 to 28) for GKRS and 14 Gy (range, 12.8 to 17.7) for LinacRS. For FRT, patients received a mean dose of 51.2 Gy (25.5 fractions, 1.85 Gy each). The mean overall follow-up values were 48 months (range, 15 to 89) for GKRS, 69 months (range, 46 to 87) for Linac, and 59.5 months (range, 33 to 83) for FRT. PFS at 5 years for GKRS, LinacRS, and FRT were respectively 93.6%, 95.6%, and 97.4% (p = 0.32, the Kruskal-Wallis). Monofractionated treatments (GKRS and LinacRS) induced more tumor volume regression than FRT (p = 0.001). Tumor recurrence or progression ranged between 3 and 5.8%, without statistically significant differences between modalities (p > 0.05). Trigeminal symptoms improved in approximately 54%, and III-IV-VI cranial nerves (CN) palsies improved in approximately 45%. After GKRS, visual acuity improved in 21% (not enough data available for other modalities). De novo deficits occurred in 5 to 7.5%. Adverse radiation effects appeared in 4.6 to 9.3% (all techniques pooled).
RS achieved a twice-higher rate of tumor volume regression than FRT. GKRS series reported an improvement in visual acuity in 21% of the cases. GKRS, Linac, and FRT provided similar clinical post therapeutic outcomes for the trigeminal and oculomotor CN.
KeywordsCavernous sinus meningioma Radiosurgery Radiotherapy Gamma knife
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (name of institute/committee) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Goldbrunner R, Minniti G, Preusser M, Jenkinson MD, Sallabanda K, Houdart E, von Deimling A, Stavrinou P, Lefranc F, Lund-Johansen M, Moyal EC, Brandsma D, Henriksson R, Soffietti R, Weller M (2016) EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas. Lancet Oncol 17:e383–e391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Franzin A, Vimercati A, Medone M, Serra C, Marzoli SB, Forti M, Gioia L, Valle M, Picozzi P (2007) Neuroophthalmological evaluation after Gamma Knife surgery for cavernous sinus meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 23Google Scholar
- 10.Dufour H, Muracciole X, Métellus P, Régis J, Chinot O, Grisoli F (2001) Long-term tumor control and functional outcome in patients with cavernous sinus meningiomas treated by radiotherapy with or without previous surgery: is there an alternative to aggressive tumor removal? Neurosurgery 48:285PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6:e1000100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Metellus P, Batra S, Karkar S, Kapoor S, Weiss S, Kleinberg L, Rigamonti D (2010) Fractionated conformal radiotherapy in the management of cavernous sinus meningiomas: long-term functional outcome and tumor control at a single institution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:836–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Sandstrom H, Nordstrom H, Johansson J, Kjall P, Jokura H, Toma-Dasu I (2014) Variability in target delineation for cavernous sinus meningioma and anaplastic astrocytoma in stereotactic radiosurgery with Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion. Acta Neurochir 156:2303–2312 discussion 2312–2303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Marchetti M, Bianchi S, Pinzi V, Tramacere I, Fumagalli ML, Milanesi IM, Ferroli P, Franzini A, Saini M, DiMeco F, Fariselli L (2016) Multisession radiosurgery for sellar and parasellar benign meningiomas: long-term tumor growth control and visual outcome. Neurosurgery 78:638–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 55.Navarria P, Pessina F, Cozzi L, Clerici E, Villa E, Ascolese AM, De Rose F, Comito T, Franzese C, D’Agostino G, Lobefalo F, Fogliata A, Reggiori G, Fornari M, Tomatis S, Bello L, Scorsetti M (2015) Hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in skull base meningiomas. J Neuro-Oncol 124:283–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 56.Stieler F, Wenz F, Abo-Madyan Y, Schweizer B, Polednik M, Herskind C, Giordano FA, Mai S (2016) Adaptive fractionated stereotactic Gamma Knife radiotherapy of meningioma using integrated stereotactic cone-beam-CT and adaptive re-planning (a-gkFSRT). Strahlenther OnkolGoogle Scholar
- 57.Nakazawa H, Mori Y, Komori M, Tsugawa T, Shibamoto Y, Kobayashi T, Hashizume C, Uchiyama Y, Hagiwara M (2014) Simulational study of a dosimetric comparison between a Gamma Knife treatment plan and an intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan for skull base tumors. J Radiat Res 55:518–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 59.Abdel-Aziz KM, Froelich SC, Dagnew E, Jean W, Breneman JC, Zuccarello M, van Loveren HR, Tew JM, Jr. (2004) Large sphenoid wing meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus: conservative surgical strategies for better functional outcomes. Neurosurgery 54:1375–1383; discussion 1383–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 64.Sheehan JP, Starke RM, Mathieu D, Young B, Sneed PK, Chiang VL, Lee JY, Kano H, Park K-JJ, Niranjan A, Kondziolka D, Barnett GH, Rush S, Golfinos JG, Lunsford LD (2013) Gamma Knife radiosurgery for the management of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a multicenter study. J Neurosurg 119:446–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 71.Conti A, Pontoriero A, Midili F, Iati G, Siragusa C, Tomasello C, La Torre D, Cardali SM, Pergolizzi S, De Renzis C (2015) CyberKnife multisession stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for perioptic meningiomas: intermediate-term results and radiobiological considerations. Springerplus 4:37CrossRefGoogle Scholar