Development of a statistical model for discrimination of rupture status in posterior communicating artery aneurysms
- 285 Downloads
Intracranial aneurysms at the posterior communicating artery (PCOM) are known to have high rupture rates compared to other locations. We developed and internally validated a statistical model discriminating between ruptured and unruptured PCOM aneurysms based on hemodynamic and geometric parameters, angio-architectures, and patient age with the objective of its future use for aneurysm risk assessment.
A total of 289 PCOM aneurysms in 272 patients modeled with image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) were used to construct statistical models using logistic group lasso regression. These models were evaluated with respect to discrimination power and goodness of fit using tenfold nested cross-validation and a split-sample approach to mimic external validation.
The final model retained maximum and minimum wall shear stress (WSS), mean parent artery WSS, maximum and minimum oscillatory shear index, shear concentration index, and aneurysm peak flow velocity, along with aneurysm height and width, bulge location, non-sphericity index, mean Gaussian curvature, angio-architecture type, and patient age. The corresponding area under the curve (AUC) was 0.8359. When omitting data from each of the three largest contributing hospitals in turn, and applying the corresponding model on the left-out data, the AUCs were 0.7507, 0.7081, and 0.5842, respectively.
Statistical models based on a combination of patient age, angio-architecture, hemodynamics, and geometric characteristics can discriminate between ruptured and unruptured PCOM aneurysms with an AUC of 84%. It is important to include data from different hospitals to create models of aneurysm rupture that are valid across hospital populations.
KeywordsCerebral aneurysm Posterior communicating artery Hemodynamics Morphology Rupture Prediction
This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NIH-NINDS, grant no. R21NS094780).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 5.Greving JP, Wermer MJ, Brown RD, Morita A, Juvela S, Yonekura M, Ishibashi T, Torner JC, Nakayama T, Rinkel GJ, Algra A (2014) Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol 13:59–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Tominari S, Morita A, Ishibashi T, Yamazaki T, Takao H, Murayama Y, Sonobe M, Yonekura M, Saito N, Shiokawa Y, Date I, Tominaga T, Nozaki K, Houkin K, Miyamoto S, Kirino T, Hashi K, Nakayama T, for the Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Study Japan Investigators (2015) Prediction model for 3-year rupture risk of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in Japanese patients. Ann Neurol 77(6):1050–1059Google Scholar
- 8.Chung BJ, Doddasomayajula R, Mut F, Detmer F, Pritz MB, Hamzei-Sichani F, Brinjikji W, Kallmes DF, Jimenez C, Putman CM, Cebral JR (2017) Angio-architectures and hemodynamics characteristics of posterior communicating artery aneurysms and their association with rupture status. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol in press:Google Scholar
- 20.Simon N, Tibshirani R (2012) Standardization and the Group Lasso Penalty. Stat Sin. https://doi.org/10.5705/ss.2011.075
- 21.Detmer FJ, Chung BJ, Mut F, Slawski M, Hamzei-Sichani F, Putman CM, Jimenez CM, Cebral JR Development and internal validation of an aneurysm rupture probability model based on patient characteristics and aneurysm location, morphology, and hemodynamics. Submitted ManuscriptGoogle Scholar
- 24.Varma S, Simon R (2006) Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection. BMC Bioinformatics 7(91)Google Scholar
- 26.Backes D, Rinkel GJE, Greving JP, Velthuis BK, Murayama Y, Takao H, Ishibashi T, Igase M, terBrugge KG, Agid R, Jääskeläinen JE, Lindgren AE, Koivisto T, von Und Zu Fraunberg M, Matsubara S, Moroi J, Wong GKC, Abrigo JM, Igase K, Matsumoto K, Wermer MJH, van Walderveen MAA, Algra A, Vergouwen MDI (2017) ELAPSS score for prediction of risk of growth of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurology 88(17):1600–1606Google Scholar
- 35.Huhtakangas J, Lehecka M, Lehto H, Jahromi BR, Niemelä M, Kivisaari R (2017) CTA analysis and assessment of morphological factors related to rupture in 413 posterior communicating artery aneurysms. Acta Neurochir. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3263-4