Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 160, Issue 8, pp 1611–1612 | Cite as

Reply to the letter to the editor of E. Shiban and B. Meyer regarding “Endplate changes after lumbar discectomy with and without implantation of an annular closure device” by Barth M et al., (Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018 Apr;160(4):855–862)

  • Martin Barth
  • Christel Weiß
  • Gerrit J. Bouma
  • Richard Bostelmann
  • Adisa Kursumovic
  • Javier Fandino
  • Claudius Thomé
Letter to the editor - Spine - Other
  • 59 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Spine - Other

Dear Editor,

We thank the authors for their interest in our original submission [3] and the subsequent letter. We had reported on the incidence and size of end plate changes (EPC) 12 months after microdiscectomy with (n = 242) or without (n = 251) implantation of an annulus closure device (ACD). EPC increased in both groups, but were significantly more pronounced after additional ACD implantation. Presence and growth of EPC, however, was not correlated with low back pain or ODI.

The authors of the letter hypothesize causality between the presence of low virulent anaerobic bacteria and EPC, which is obviously based on a single case of ACD anchor loosening they have encountered [7]. However, current evidence clearly speaks against the authors’ speculations:

First, there was not a single case of implant loosening in our series of 242 patients that would resemble the authors’ case report [7]. EPC should not be intermingled with aseptic implant failure or loosening, as they generally occur...

References

  1. 1.
    Agarwal V, Golish SR, Alamin TF (2011) Bacteriologic culture of excised intervertebral disc from immunocompetent patients undergoing single level primary lumbar microdiscectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:397–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albert HB, Lambert P, Rollason J, Sorensen JS, Worthington T, Pedersen MB, Norgaard HS, Vernallis A, Busch F, Manniche C, Elliott T (2013) Does nuclear tissue infected with bacteria following disc herniations lead to Modic changes in the adjacent vertebrae? Eur Spine J 22:690–696CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barth M, Weiss C, Bouma GJ, Bostelmann R, Kursumovic A, Fandino J, Thome C (2018) Endplate changes after lumbar discectomy with and without implantation of an annular closure device. Acta Neurochir 160:855–862CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ben-Galim P, Rand N, Giladi M, Schwartz D, Ashkenazi E, Millgram M, Dekel S, Floman Y (2006) Association between sciatica and microbial infection: true infection or culture contamination? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2507–2509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gronblad M, Virri J, Tolonen J, Seitsalo S, Kaapa E, Kankare J, Myllynen P, Karaharju EO (1994) A controlled immunohistochemical study of inflammatory cells in disc herniation tissue. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:2744–2751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kursumovic A, Kienzler JC, Bouma GJ, Bostelmann R, Heggeness M, Thome C, Miller LE, Barth M (2018) Morphology and clinical relevance of vertebral endplate changes following limited lumbar discectomy with or without bone-anchored annular closure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:0000000000002632Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lange N, Meyer B, Shiban E (2018) Symptomatic annulus-repair-device loosening due to a low-grade infection. Acta Neurochir 160:199–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leitner L, Malaj I, Sadoghi P, Amerstorfer F, Glehr M, Vander K, Leithner A, Radl R (2018) Pedicle screw loosening is correlated to chronic subclinical deep implant infection: a retrospective database analysis. Eur Spine J 13:018–5592Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li B, Dong Z, Wu Y, Zeng J, Zheng Q, Xiao B, Cai X, Xiao Z (2016) Association between lumbar disc degeneration and Propionibacterium acnes infection: clinical research and preliminary exploration of animal experiment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:E764–E769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rigal J, Thelen T, Byrne F, Cogniet A, Boissiere L, Aunoble S, Le Huec JC (2016) Prospective study using anterior approach did not show association between Modic 1 changes and low grade infection in lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 25:1000–1005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rolfe RD, Hentges DJ, Campbell BJ, Barrett JT (1978) Factors related to the oxygen tolerance of anaerobic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 36:306–313PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stirling A, Worthington T, Rafiq M, Lambert PA, Elliott TS (2001) Association between sciatica and Propionibacterium acnes. Lancet 357:2024–2025CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wedderkopp N, Thomsen K, Manniche C, Kolmos HJ, Secher Jensen T, Leboeuf Yde C (2009) No evidence for presence of bacteria in modic type I changes. Acta Radiol 50:65–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yuan Y, Zhou Z, Jiao Y, Li C, Zheng Y, Lin Y, Xiao J, Chen Z, Cao P (2017) Histological identification of Propionibacterium acnes in nonpyogenic degenerated intervertebral discs. Biomed Res Int 2017:6192935PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Barth
    • 1
  • Christel Weiß
    • 2
  • Gerrit J. Bouma
    • 3
  • Richard Bostelmann
    • 4
  • Adisa Kursumovic
    • 5
  • Javier Fandino
    • 6
  • Claudius Thomé
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryKlinikum Frankfurt HöchstFrankfurt am MainGermany
  2. 2.Department of Medical StatisticsUniversity Medicine Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgeryOLVG/Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamNetherlands
  4. 4.Department of NeurosurgeryHeinrich Heine-UniversityDuesseldorfGermany
  5. 5.Department of NeurosurgeryDONAUISAR KlinikumDeggendorfGermany
  6. 6.Department of NeurosurgeryKantonsspital AarauAarauSwitzerland
  7. 7.Department of NeurosurgeryMedical University InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations