Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 160, Issue 2, pp 369–370 | Cite as

Innovation in neurosurgery—response to: “IDEAL”, the operating microscope, and the parachute

Letter to the Editor (by Invitation) - Brain Tumors


  1. 1.
    Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, Sen S, Tang K, Davies J, Keeble T, Mielewczik M, Kaprielian R, Malik IS, Nijjer SS, Petraco R, Cook C, Ahmad Y, Howard J, Baker C, Sharp A, Gerber R, Talwar S, Assomull R, Mayet J, Wensel R, Collier D, Shun-Shin M, Thom SA, Davies JE, Francis DP, Investigators O (2017) Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet.
  2. 2.
    Ammirati M (2017) Innovation in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir 159:1955-1956Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fiorella D, Molyneux A, Coon A, Szikora I, Saatci I, Baltacioglu F, Sultan A, Arthur A, Investigators W-IS (2017) Demographic, procedural and 30-day safety results from the WEB Intra-saccular Therapy Study (WEB-IT). J Neurointerv Surg.
  4. 4.
    Klisch J, Sychra V, Strasilla C, Liebig T, Fiorella D (2011) The woven EndoBridge cerebral aneurysm embolization device (WEB II): initial clinical experience. Neuroradiology 53:599–607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kramer DB, Xu S, Kesselheim AS (2012) Regulation of medical devices in the United States and European Union. N Engl J Med 366:848–855CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J, Balliol C, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Blazeby JM, Boutron IC, Campbell WB, Clavien PA, Cook JA, Ergina PL, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Maddern GJ, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Meakins J, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Muskens IS, Diederen SJH, Senders JT, Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH, van Furth WR, May AM, Smith TR, Bredenoord AL, Broekman MLD (2017) Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review. Acta Neurochir 159:1957-1966Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muskens IS, Gupta S, Hulsbergen A, Moojen WA, Broekman MLD (2017) Introduction of novel medical devices in surgery: ethical challenges of current oversight and regulation. J Am Coll Surg 225:558–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryMedical Center HaaglandenThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolph MagnusUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyMassachusetts General Hospital/ Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations