Regional Hounsfield unit measurement of screw trajectory for predicting pedicle screw fixation using cortical bone trajectory: a retrospective cohort study
- 333 Downloads
The sufficiency of screw anchoring is a critical factor for achieving successful spinal fusion; however, no reliable method for predicting pedicle screw fixation has been established. Recently, Hounsfield units (HU) obtained from computed tomography (CT) was developed as a new reliable tool to determine the bone quality. The purpose of the present study was to demonstrate the utility of regional HU measurement of the screw trajectory to predict the primary and long-term fixation strength of pedicle screws.
The insertional torque of pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory technique was measured intraoperatively in 92 consecutive patients who underwent single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The cylindrical area of each screw was plotted on the preoperative CT image by precisely confirming the screw position, and the screw trajectory was measured in HU. First, three parameters: the bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae, and regional HU values of the screw trajectory, were correlated with the insertional torque and compared among three groups. Next, pedicle screw loosening was evaluated by postoperative CT obtained 12 months after surgery, and clinical and imaging data were analyzed to assess whether regional HU values could be used as a predictor of screw loosening.
Regional HU values of the screw trajectory (r = 0.75, p < 0.001) had stronger correlation with the insertional torque than the femoral BMD (r = 0.59, p < 0.001) and lumbar BMD (r = 0.55, p < 0.001). The incidence of screw loosening was 4.6% (16/351). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that regional HU value (odds ratio = 0.70; 95% confidence interval = 0.56-0.84; p = 0.018) was an independent risk factor significantly affected screw loosening.
Regional HU values of the screw trajectory could be a strong predictor of both primary and long-term screw fixation in vivo.
KeywordsHounsfield units Pedicle screw fixation Screw loosening Insertional torque Bone density Simulation analysis Cortical bone trajectory
We thank Akio Seitoku for helpful advice on measuring HU.
No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of our institutional (National Hospital Organization, Murayama Medical Center) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Aichmair A, Moser M, Bauer MR, Bachmann E, Snedeker JG, Betz M, Farshad M (2017) Pull-out strength of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis of a randomized cadaveric study. Eur Spine J 26:2865–2872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, Hosogane N, Abe Y, Asazuma T, Chiba K (2016) Biomechanical evaluation of fixation strength among different sizes of pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal screw size for optimal fixation? Acta Neurochir 158:465–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar