Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 159, Issue 10, pp 1849–1855 | Cite as

Long-term follow-up after endoscopic trans-sphenoidal surgery or initial observation in clivus chordomas

  • Jon Ramm-Pettersen
  • Radek Frič
  • Jon Berg-Johnsen
Original Article - Brain Tumors

Abstract

Background

Resection of clivus chordomas through extensive skull base approaches is associated with high mortality and morbidity even in experienced hands. We report our experience with endoscopic trans-sphenoidal surgery, or a “wait-and-scan” strategy in selected patients.

Method

Ten patients were diagnosed with clivus chordomas during an 8-year period. Six patients underwent primary treatment with endoscopic trans-sphenoidal surgery, followed by adjuvant proton-beam therapy in three of these patients. Four patients with minor symptoms were followed-up untreated. Mean follow-up was 91 months.

Results

Of the six patients operated on, total or gross total resection was achieved in four, partial resection in one and biopsy was taken in one. Preoperative cranial neuropathies resolved in three out of five patients, and no new cranial nerve palsies were encountered. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak occurred in one patient. Four patients were initially followed-up without any treatment, and three of these have remained stable without tumour progression for a mean of 94 months. Due to a slow, though progressive growth of tumour, one patient was operated on after 80 months of initial observation.

Conclusions

The natural course of clivus chordomas has yet to be defined. The endoscopic trans-sphenoidal approach is a valid, minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of clival chordomas, and in selected patients a “wait and scan” strategy can be considered. Our long-term results show low mortality and good functional outcome. An endonasal endoscopic trans-sphenoidal approach should be a principal part of the armamentarium of surgeons treating clivus chordomas.

Keywords

Clivus chordoma Endoscopic surgery Trans-sphenoidal approach Proton beam therapy 

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Mefty O, Borba LA (1997) Skull base chordomas: a management challenge. J Neurosurg 86:182–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chibbaro S, Cornelius JF, Froelich S, Tigan L, Kehrli P, Debry C, Romano A, Herman P, George B, Bresson D (2014) Endoscopic endonasal approach in the management of skull base chordomas—clinical experience on a large series, technique, outcome, and pitfalls. Neurosurg Rev 37:217–224 discussion 224-215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dehdashti AR, Karabatsou K, Ganna A, Witterick I, Gentili F (2008) Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for treatment of clival chordomas: early results in 12 patients. Neurosurgery 63:299–307 discussion 307-299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Di Maio S, Temkin N, Ramanathan D, Sekhar LN (2011) Current comprehensive management of cranial base chordomas: 10-year meta-analysis of observational studies. J Neurosurg 115:1094–1105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di Maio S, Yip S, Al Zhrani GA, Alotaibi FE, Al Turki A, Kong E, Rostomily RC (2015) Novel targeted therapies in chordoma: an update. Ther Clin Risk Manag 11:873–883CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fagundes MA, Hug EB, Liebsch NJ, Daly W, Efird J, Munzenrider JE (1995) Radiation therapy for chordomas of the base of skull and cervical spine: patterns of failure and outcome after relapse. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 33:579–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fahlbusch R, Ganslandt O, Buchfelder M, Schott W, Nimsky C (2001) Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging during transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 95:381–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flanagan AM YT (2013) Chordoma. WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. Pathology and Genetics. IARC Press Lyon, pp 328–329Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forsyth PA, Cascino TL, Shaw EG, Scheithauer BW, O’Fallon JR, Dozier JC, Piepgras DG (1993) Intracranial chordomas: a clinicopathological and prognostic study of 51 cases. J Neurosurg 78:741–747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fraser JF, Nyquist GG, Moore N, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2010) Endoscopic endonasal transclival resection of chordomas: operative technique, clinical outcome, and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 112:1061–1069CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gay E, Sekhar LN, Rubinstein E, Wright DC, Sen C, Janecka IP, Snyderman CH (1995) Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the cranial base: results and follow-up of 60 patients. Neurosurgery 36:887–896 discussion 896-887CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, Mataza JC, Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A (2006) A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 116:1882–1886CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heffelfinger MJ, Dahlin DC, MacCarty CS, Beabout JW (1973) Chordomas and cartilaginous tumors at the skull base. Cancer 32:410–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holzmann D, Reisch R, Krayenbuhl N, Hug E, Bernays RL (2010) The transnasal transclival approach for clivus chordoma. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 53:211–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kano H, Iqbal FO, Sheehan J, Mathieu D, Seymour ZA, Niranjan A, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Pollock BE, Rosseau G, Sneed PK, McDermott MW, Lunsford LD (2011) Stereotactic radiosurgery for chordoma: a report from the north American gamma knife consortium. Neurosurgery 68:379–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2011) The endoscope-assisted ventral approach compared with open microscope-assisted surgery for clival chordomas. World Neurosurg 76:318–327 discussion 259-362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Laws ER Jr (1984) Transsphenoidal surgery for tumors of the clivus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 92:100–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maira G, Pallini R, Anile C, Fernandez E, Salvinelli F, La Rocca LM, Rossi GF (1996) Surgical treatment of clival chordomas: the transsphenoidal approach revisited. J Neurosurg 85:784–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Noel G, Feuvret L, Ferrand R, Boisserie G, Mazeron JJ, Habrand JL (2004) Radiotherapeutic factors in the management of cervical-basal chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Neurosurgery 55:1252–1260 discussion 1260-1252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ouyang T, Zhang N, Zhang Y, Jiao J, Ren J, Huang T, Chen J (2014) Clinical characteristics, immunohistochemistry, and outcomes of 77 patients with skull base chordomas. World Neurosurg 81:790–797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ramm-Pettersen J, Berg-Johnsen J, Hol PK, Roy S, Bollerslev J, Schreiner T, Helseth E (2011) Intra-operative MRI facilitates tumour resection during trans-sphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir (Wein) 153:1367–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saito K, Toda M, Tomita T, Ogawa K, Yoshida K (2012) Surgical results of an endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas. Acta Neurochir 154:879–886CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sen C, Triana AI, Berglind N, Godbold J, Shrivastava RK (2010) Clival chordomas: clinical management, results, and complications in 71 patients. J Neurosurg 113:1059–1071CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stacchiotti S, Sommer J, Chordoma Global Consensus G (2015) Building a global consensus approach to chordoma: a position paper from the medical and patient community. Lancet Oncol 16:e71–e83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stiller CA, Trama A, Serraino D, Rossi S, Navarro C, Chirlaque MD, Casali PG, Group RW (2013) Descriptive epidemiology of sarcomas in Europe: report from the RARECARE project. Eur J Cancer 49:684–695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stippler M, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB (2009) Endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas. Neurosurgery 64:268–277 discussion 277-268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang K, Wang L, Wu Z, Tian K, Ren C, Jia G, Zhang L, Zhang J (2016) Bone invasiveness is associated with prognosis in clivus chordomas. J Clin Neurosci 27:147–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yasuda M, Bresson D, Chibbaro S, Cornelius JF, Polivka M, Feuvret L, Takayasu M, George B (2012) Chordomas of the skull base and cervical spine: clinical outcomes associated with a multimodal surgical resection combined with proton-beam radiation in 40 patients. Neurosurg Rev 35:171–182; discussion 182-173Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
  2. 2.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations