Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 159, Issue 5, pp 907–914 | Cite as

Head injuries and the risk of concurrent cervical spine fractures

  • Tuomo Thesleff
  • Anneli Kataja
  • Juha Öhman
  • Teemu M. Luoto
Original Article - Brain Injury

Abstract

Background

Cervical spine injuries of variable severity are common among patients with an acute traumatic brain injury (TBI). We hypothesised that TBI patients with positive head computed tomography (CT) scans would have a significantly higher risk of having an associated cervical spine fracture compared to patients with negative head CT scans.

Method

This widely generalisable retrospective sample was derived from 3,023 consecutive patients, who, due to an acute head injury (HI), underwent head CT at the Emergency Department of Tampere University Hospital (August 2010–July 2012). Medical records were reviewed to identify the individuals whose cervical spine was CT-imaged within 1 week after primary head CT due to a clinical suspicion of a cervical spine injury (CSI) (n = 1,091).

Results

Of the whole cranio-cervically CT-imaged sample (n = 1,091), 24.7% (n = 269) had an acute CT-positive TBI. Car accidents 22.4% (n = 244) and falls 47.8% (n = 521) were the most frequent injury mechanisms. On cervical CT, any type of fracture was found in 6.6% (n = 72) and dislocation and/or subluxation in 2.8% (n = 31) of the patients. The patients with acute traumatic intracranial lesions had significantly (p = 0.04; OR = 1.689) more cervical spine fractures (9.3%, n = 25) compared to head CT-negative patients (5.7%, n = 47). On an individual cervical column level, head CT positivity was especially related to C6 fractures (p = 0.031, OR = 2.769). Patients with cervical spine fractures (n = 72) had altogether 101 fractured vertebrae, which were most often C2 (22.8, n = 23), C7 (19.8%, n = 20) and C6 (16.8%, n = 17).

Conclusions

Head trauma patients with acute intracranial lesions on CT have a higher risk for cervical spine fractures in comparison to patients with a CT-negative head injury. Although statistically significant, the difference in fracture rate was small. However, based on these results, we suggest that cervical spine fractures should be acknowledged when treating CT-positive TBIs.

Keywords

Brain injuries Computed tomography Head injury Spinal injuries Cervical spine fractures 

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson PA, Muchow RD, Munoz A, Tontz WL, Resnick DK (2010) Clearance of the asymptomatic cervical spine: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 24:100–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bayless P, Ray VG (1989) Incidence of cervical spine injuries in association with blunt head trauma. Am J Emerg Med 7:139–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blackmore CC, Emerson SS, Mann FA, Koepsell TD (1999) Cervical spine imaging in patients with trauma: determination of fracture risk to optimize use. Radiology 211:759–765CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Drainer EK, Graham CA, Munro PT (2003) Blunt cervical spine injuries in Scotland 1995–2000. Injury 34:330–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fujii T, Faul M, Sasser S (2013) Risk factors for cervical spine injury among patients with traumatic brain injury. J Emerg Trauma Shock 6:252–258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gbaanador GB, Fruin AH, Taylon C (1986) Role of routine emergency cervical radiography in head trauma. Am J Surg 152:643–648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldberg W, Mueller C, Panacek E, Tigges S, Hoffman JR, Mower WR, NEXUS Group (2001) Distribution and patterns of blunt traumatic cervical spine injury. Ann Emerg Med 38:17–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hasler RM, Exadaktylos AK, Bouamra O, Benneker LM, Clancy M, Sieber R, Zimmermann H, Lecky F (2012) Epidemiology and predictors of cervical spine injury in adult major trauma patients: a multicenter cohort study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72:975–981CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hessmann MH, Hofmann A, Kreitner KF, Lott C, Rommens PM (2006) The benefit of multislice CT in the emergency room management of polytraumatized patients. Acta Chir Belg 106:500–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hills MW, Deane SA (1993) Head injury and facial injury: is there an increased risk of cervical spine injury? J Trauma 34:549–553, discussion 553–4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoffman JR, Wolfson AB, Todd K, Mower WR (1998) Selective cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: methodology of the national emergency X-radiography utilization study (NEXUS). Ann Emerg Med 32:461–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holly LT, Kelly DF, Counelis GJ, Blinman T, McArthur DL, Cryer HG (2002) Cervical spine trauma associated with moderate and severe head injury: incidence, risk factors, and injury characteristics. J Neurosurg 96:285–291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holm L, Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Borg J, Neurotrauma Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury of the WHO Collaborating Centre (2005) Summary of the WHO collaborating centre for neurotrauma task force on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med 37:137–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B, Kock-Jensen C (2000) Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild, and moderate head injuries. The scandinavian neurotrauma committee. J Trauma 48:760–766CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE, Jha A, Johansen M, Jones L, Krassioukov A, Mulcahey MJ, Schmidt-Read M, Waring W (2011) International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med 34:535–546CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Linsenmaier U, Krotz M, Hauser H, Rock C, Rieger J, Bohndorf K, Pfeifer KJ, Reiser M (2002) Whole-body computed tomography in polytrauma: techniques and management. Eur Radiol 12:1728–1740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB, Giles GG, Wallace AB, Anderson PR, Guiver TA, McGale P, Cain TM, Dowty JG, Bickerstaffe AC, Darby SC (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Michael DB, Guyot DR, Darmody WR (1989) Coincidence of head and cervical spine injury. J Neurotrauma 6:177–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Milby AH, Halpern CH, Guo W, Stein SC (2008) Prevalence of cervical spinal injury in trauma. Neurosurg Focus 25:E10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mulligan RP, Friedman JA, Mahabir RC (2010) A nationwide review of the associations among cervical spine injuries, head injuries, and facial fractures. J Trauma 68:587–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schmidt OI, Gahr RH, Gosse A, Heyde CE (2009) ATLS(R) and damage control in spine trauma. World J Emerg Surg 4:9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schoenfeld AJ, Bono CM, McGuire KJ, Warholic N, Harris MB (2010) Computed tomography alone versus computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the identification of occult injuries to the cervical spine: a meta-analysis. J Trauma 68:109–113, discussion 113–4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Soicher E, Demetriades D (1991) Cervical spine injuries in patients with head injuries. Br J Surg 78:1013–1014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tian HL, Guo Y, Hu J, Rong BY, Wang G, Gao WW, Chen SW, Chen H (2009) Clinical characterization of comatose patients with cervical spine injury and traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 67:1305–1310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vahldiek JL, Thieme S, Hamm B, Niehues SM (2016) Incidence of combined cranial and cervical spine injuries in patients with blunt minor trauma: are combined CT examinations of the head and cervical spine justified?. Acta Radiol. doi:10.1177/0284185116673120
  26. 26.
    Williams J, Jehle D, Cottington E, Shufflebarger C (1992) Head, facial, and clavicular trauma as a predictor of cervical-spine injury. Ann Emerg Med 21:719–722CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neuroscience and RehabilitationTampere University HospitalTampereFinland
  2. 2.Medical Imaging Centre, Department of RadiologyTampere University HospitalTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations