Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 159, Issue 6, pp 1119–1128 | Cite as

Sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic patients over 30 years old in the Korean population

  • Seil Sohn
  • Chun Kee ChungEmail author
  • Yongjung Jay Kim
  • Inbo Han
  • Su Min Kang
  • Ji Won Yoon
  • Hyejin Kim
Original Article - Spine

Abstract

Background

We aim to provide sagittal and pelvic parameters according to different age groups in an asymptomatic population all over 30 years old and to investigate the possible causes of changes in these parameters.

Methods

Whole-spine, standing lateral radiographs were taken in 128 asymptomatic Korean people over 30 years old. The spinal parameters (the total thoracic kyphosis (TTK), maximal lumbar lordosis (MLL), total lumbar lordosis (TLL), lower lumbar lordosis (LLL), thoracolumbar junctional angle (TLJA), and lumbar inclination (LI)), pelvic parameters (pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and pelvic tilt (PT)), and spinal balance parameters (spinal balance, sacropelvic balance, and spinopelvic balance) were measured. The body mass index, body protein mass, waist line, skeletal muscle mass, and body fat mass were also measured for potential causes.

Results

TTK and TLJA were significantly increased in the group over 70 years of age compared to the other age groups (p = 0.0002, <0.001). TLL was significantly decreased in the group over 70 years of age (p = 0.002), whereas the PI values were similar to PI even in over 70-year age group. LLL did not differ in the group over 70 years of age (p = 0.29), gradually increasing with an increase in age. SS was significantly decreased and PT was significantly increased in the group over 70 years of age as compared to the other age groups (p = 0.049, 0.049, respectively). PI was similar in all age groups (p = 0.75). Spinal balance was significantly decreased in the group over 70 years of age (p = <0.0001). PT was significantly associated with body protein mass and skeletal muscle mass (p = 0.01, 0.001, respectively). Body protein mass and skeletal muscle mass were significantly lower in the group over 70 years of age (p = 0.02, 0.02) and were possible causes.

Conclusions

Several sagittal and pelvic parameters are different in asymptomatic adults over 70 years of age. Decreased body protein mass and skeletal muscle mass are possible causes of these changes.

Keywords

Sagittal balance Spinal alignment Sacral slope Adult spine Normal patterns 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosure

The authors have no personal financial or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.

Funding

The Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea provided financial support in the form of a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) (grant number: HI16C1559). The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH (1989) Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:717–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Pelissier J (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15:415–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cil A, Yazici M, Uzumcugil A, Kandemir U, Alanay A, Alanay Y, Acaroglu RE, Surat A (2005) The evolution of sagittal segmental alignment of the spine during childhood. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faria SL, Faria OP, Cardeal MD, Ito MK (2014) Validation study of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry among obese patients. Obes Surg 24:1476–1480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fon GT, Pitt MJ, Thies AC (1980) Thoracic kyphosis—range in normal subjects. Am J Roentgenol 134:979–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gangnet N, Dumas R, Pomero V, Mitulescu A, Skalli W, Vital JM (2006) Three-dimensional spinal and pelvic alignment in an asymptomatic population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E507–E512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW (1995) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:1351–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jackson RP, Hales C (2000) Congruent spinopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2808–2815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jackson RP, Kanemura T, Kawakami N, Hales C (2000) Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:575–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackson RP, McManus AC (1994) Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:1611–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC, Hales C (1998) Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:1750–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Ando M, Yamada H, Hashizume H, Yoshida M (2002) Lumbar sagittal balance influences the clinical outcome after decompression and posterolateral spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim CH, Chung CK, Hong HS, Kim EH, Kim MJ, Park BJ (2012) Validation of a simple computerized tool for measuring spinal and pelvic parameters. J Neurosurg Spine 16:154–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim HJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Park MS, Song KS, Piyaskulkaew C, Chuntarapas T (2014) Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision surgery have higher postoperative lumbar lordosis and larger sagittal balance corrections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:E576–E580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim YB, Kim YJ, Ahn YJ, Kang GB, Yang JH, Lim H, Lee SW (2014) A comparative analysis of sagittal spinopelvic alignment between young and old men without localized disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 23:1400–1406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kobayashi T, Atsuta Y, Matsuno T, Takeda N (2004) A longitudinal study of congruent sagittal spinal alignment in an adult cohort. Spine 29:671–676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Korovessis P, Stamatakis M, Baikousis A (1999) Segmental roentgenographic analysis of vertebral inclination on sagittal plane in asymptomatic versus chronic low back pain patients. J Spinal Disord 12:131–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Korovessis PG, Stamatakis MV, Baikousis AG (1998) Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in the sagittal plane in an asymptomatic Greek population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:700–704, discussion 704-705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gomez JM, Heitmann BL, Kent-Smith L, Melchior JC, Pirlich M, Scharfetter H, Schols AMWJ, Pichard C (2004) Bioelectrical impedance analysis - part II: utilization in clinical practice. Clin Nutr 23:1430–1453CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, Hawkinson N, Gagey PM, Ondra S, Farcy JP (2008) Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1572–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lau D, Clark AJ, Scheer JK, Daubs MD, Coe JD, Paonessa KJ, LaGrone MO, Kasten MD, Amaral RA, Trobisch PD, Lee JH, Fabris-Monterumici D, Anand N, Cree AK, Hart RA, Hey LA, Ames CP, SRSASD Committee (2014) Proximal junctional kyphosis and failure after spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review of the literature as a background to classification development. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:2093–2102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lazennec JY, Ramare S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B, Hansen S, Saillant G, Maurs L, Trabelsi R (2000) Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9:47–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee CS, Chung SS, Kang KC, Park SJ, Shin SK (2011) Normal patterns of sagittal alignment of the spine in young adults radiological analysis in a Korean population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E1648–E1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7:99–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lowe TG, Kasten MD (1994) An analysis of sagittal curves and balance after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann’s disease. A review of 32 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:1680–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mendoza-Lattes S, Ries Z, Gao Y, Weinstein SL (2010) Natural history of spinopelvic alignment differs from symptomatic deformity of the spine. Spine 35:E792–E798CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rajnics P, Pomero V, Templier A, Lavaste F, Illes T (2001) Computer-assisted assessment of spinal sagittal plane radiographs. J Spinal Disord 14:135–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Illes T (2002) The association of sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters in asymptomatic persons and patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:24–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Illes T (2002) The importance of spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbar disc lesions. Int Orthop 26:104–108CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30:346–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Van Royen BJ, De Gast A, Smit TH (2000) Deformity planning for sagittal plane corrective osteotomies of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 9:492–498CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Van Royen BJ, Toussaint HM, Kingma I, Bot SD, Caspers M, Harlaar J, Wuisman PI (1998) Accuracy of the sagittal vertical axis in a standing lateral radiograph as a measurement of balance in spinal deformities. Eur Spine J 7:408–412CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2002) Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 11:80–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Keeney JA, Bridwell KH (1998) Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgerySeoul National University College of MedicineJongno-guSouth Korea
  2. 2.Neuroscience Research InstituteSeoul National University Medical Research CenterSeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Clinical Research InstituteSeoul National University HospitalSeoulSouth Korea
  4. 4.Department of Neurosurgery, CHA Bundang Medical CenterCHA UniversityGyeonggidoSouth Korea
  5. 5.Department of Brain and Cognitive SciencesSeoul National University College of Natural SciencesSeoulSouth Korea
  6. 6.Department of Orthopedics, College of Physicians and SurgeonsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  7. 7.Department of Radiology, Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam CenterSeoul National University HospitalSeoulSouth Korea
  8. 8.Department of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam CenterSeoul National University HospitalSeoulSouth Korea
  9. 9.Seoul National University Bundang HospitalGyeonggidoSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations