Muscular atrophy in severe cases of cubital tunnel syndrome: prognostic factors and outcome after surgical treatment
- 261 Downloads
Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is a frequent neuropathy, leading to sensor-motoric dysfunction. Many patients even present with muscular atrophy as a sign for severe and long-lasting nerve impairment, usually suggesting unfavourable outcome. We analysed if those patients benefit from surgical treatment on a long-term basis.
Between January 2010 and March 2015, 42 consecutive cases of CuTS with atrophy of the intrinsic hand muscles were surgically treated in our department. Clinical data of the treatment course and postoperative results were collected. Follow-up was prospectively assessed according to McGowen grading and Bishop outcome score. Mean follow-up time was 39.8 (±17.0) months.
All patients were treated with in situ decompression; in 33%, submuscular transposition was performed. Forty-five percent showed improvement of sensory deficits and 57% showed improvement of motor deficits 6 months after the operation. Atrophy improved in 76%. At the time of follow-up, 79% were satisfied with the postoperative result and 77% of patients reached good or excellent outcome according to modified Bishop rating scale. Patients with improvement of atrophy had significantly shorter symptom duration period (7 ± 10 months vs 26 ± 33 months; p < 0.05). In the case of intraoperative pseudoneuroma observation, atrophy improvement was less likely (p < 0.05).
In severe cases of CuTS with atrophy of the intrinsic hand muscles, surgical treatment enables improvement of sensory function, motor function and atrophy even in cases with muscular atrophy. Atrophy improvement was more likely in cases of short symptom duration and less likely in cases with pseudoneuroma.
KeywordsAtrophy Cubital tunnel syndrome Denervation Neuropathie Nervus ulnaris
Compliance with ethical standards
No funding was received for this research.
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 9.Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R, Giannini F, Padua L (2012) Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Wiley Online Library, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006839.pub2Google Scholar
- 18.Krishnan KG, Pinzer T, Schackert G (2006) A novel endoscopic technique in treating single nerve entrapment syndromes with special attention to ulnar nerve transposition and tarsal tunnel release: clinical application. Oper Neurosurg 59(1 Suppl 1):ONS89-ONS100Google Scholar
- 23.McGowan AJ (1950) The results of transposition of the ulnar nerve for traumatic ulnar neuritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 32–B(3):293–301Google Scholar
- 33.Sunderland S (ed) (1978) Nerves and nerve injuries, 2. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar