Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 159, Issue 5, pp 881–887 | Cite as

How I do it: The expanded trans/supraorbital approach for large space-occupying lesions of the anterior fossa

  • Anne-Katrin Hickmann
  • Britta-Jacqueline Gaida
  • Robert Reisch
How I Do it - Neurosurgical Techniques
  • 255 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The supraorbital rim often interferes with the required upward movement of the instruments for resection of large frontal-lobe tumours through a classic supraorbital craniotomy. Here, we present the expanded trans/supraorbital approach to overcome these limitations.

Methods

After an eyebrow skin incision, a one-piece bone flap was created incorporating the orbital rim and roof. Basal extension of the craniotomy allowed for a better intracranial visualisation with improved manoeuvrability and angulation of the instruments without using brain retraction.

Conclusions

This approach poses a feasible alternative to large frontal craniotomies for frontal-lobe tumours, for which a regular supraorbital craniotomy is insufficient.

Keywords

Anterior fossa Brain tumour Endoscopy Minimally invasive Supraorbital 

Supplementary material

ESM 1

“How I do it—the trans/supraorbital approach” illustrates the principal steps of this approach for the resection of frontal lobe tumours. The video focuses on the approach itself, as well as closure to achieve optimal cosmetic results, rather than the resection of a frontal lobe pathology. (MP4 339347 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Beseoglu K, Lodes S, Stummer W, Steiger HJ, Hanggi D (2011) The transorbital keyhole approach: early and long-term outcome analysis of approach-related morbidity and cosmetic results. Technical note. J Neurosurg 114:852–856CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ramos-Zuniga R, Velazquez H, Barajas MA, Lopez R, Sanchez E, Trejo S (2002) Trans-supraorbital approach to supratentorial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 51:125–130, discussion 130–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reisch R, Perneczky A, Filippi R (2003) Surgical technique of the supraorbital key-hole craniotomy. Surg Neurol 59:223–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reisch R, Marcus HJ, Hugelshofer M, Koechlin NO, Stadie A, Kockro RA (2014) Patients’ cosmetic satisfaction, pain, and functional outcomes after supraorbital craniotomy through an eyebrow incision. J Neurosurg 121:730–734CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Steiger HJ, Schmid-Elsaesser R, Stummer W, Uhl E (2001) Transorbital keyhole approach to anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 48:347–351, discussion 351–342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thaher F, Hopf N, Hickmann AK, Kurucz P, Bittl M, Henkes H, Feigl G (2015) Supraorbital keyhole approach to the skull base: evaluation of complications related to CSF fistulas and opened frontal sinus. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 76:433–437CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne-Katrin Hickmann
    • 1
  • Britta-Jacqueline Gaida
    • 2
  • Robert Reisch
    • 1
  1. 1.ENDOMIN—Center for Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive NeurosurgeryHirslanden ClinicZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care MedicineHirslanden ClinicZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations