Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 159, Issue 3, pp 485–490 | Cite as

Elective ICP monitoring: how long is long enough?

  • S. D. Thompson
  • A. Coutts
  • C. L. Craven
  • A. K. Toma
  • L. W. Thorne
  • L. D. Watkins
Original Article - Brain Injury

Abstract

Background

Intracranial pressure monitoring is commonly undertaken to assess and manage acute patients following head injury. However, ICP monitoring can also be a useful diagnostic tool in the management of CSF dynamics in elective patients. To date, there is little published research to suggest how long these elective patients require ICP monitoring in order to gain an accurate picture of a patient’s ICP dynamics. At the author’s institution, a minimum of 48-h data collection is currently undertaken in patients with a suspected ICP abnormality.

Methods

A retrospective audit was undertaken comparing overall median ICP and overall median pulse amplitude data at three time points, 24 h, 48 h and total time analysed (if longer than 48 h). Paired T-test was used to assess if there were statistically significant differences between 24-h versus 48-h monitoring and total duration of monitoring. All patients admitted over a 6-month period for ICPM who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.

Results

Eighteen patients met the criteria. Median age was 45.8 years, range 22–83 years, 12 female and 6 male. No complications were experienced as a result of ICPM. Diagnosis included NPH, IIH, suspected shunt malfunction and Chiari malformation. The results demonstrated that there is no statistical difference between 24 h and 48 h or longer for both overall median ICP and pulse amplitude.

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrate that ICP monitoring of elective adult patients using a Spiegelberg intraparenchymal bolt for 24 h gives an accurate picture of a patient’s ICP dynamics compared with longer periods of monitoring.

Keywords

Elective ICP Intracranial pressure monitoring Hydrocephalus Management 

Abbreviations

CSF

Cerebrospinal fluid

ICP

Intracranial pressure

ICPM

Intracranial pressure monitoring

IIH

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension

iNPH

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Tamimi YZ, Helmy A, Bavette S, Prive SJ (2009) Assessment of zero drift in the Codman intracranial pressure monitor: a study from 2 neurointensive care units. Neurosurgery 64(1):94–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allin D, Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z (2008) Laboratory testing of the Pressio intracranial pressure monitor. Neurosurgery 62:1158–1161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burrows G (1848) On disorders of the cerebral circulation and on the connection between affections of the brain and diseases of the heart. Lea & Blanchard, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cushing H (1926) The third circulation in studies in intracranial physiology and surgery. Oxford Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dimitriou J, Levivier M, Gugliotta M (2015) Comparison of complications in patients receiving different types of intracranial pressure monitoring: a retrospective study in single centre in Switzerland. World Neurosurg 89:641–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eide PK (2003) Quantitative analysis of continuous intracranial pressure recordings in symptomatic patients with extracranial shunts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:231–237CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eide PK (2006) Intracranial pressure paramiters in indiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients treated with ventriculo-peritoneal shunts. Acta Neurochir 148:21–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eide PK, Sorteberg W (2010) Diagnostic intracranial pressure monitoring and surgical management in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a 6 year review of 214 patients. Neurosurgery 66:80–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gelabert-Gonzalez M, Ginesta-Galan V, Sernamito-Garcia R, Allut AG, Bandin-Dieguez J, Rumbo RM (2006) The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice. Assessment in 1000 cases. Acta Neurosur 148(4):435–441Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horcajadas A, Roman A, Olivares G, Saura E, Jorques A, Cordero N, Ibanez B, Sanchez C, Roldan MA (2011) Usefulnes of IPC continuous monitoring in shunt dysfunction. Neurocirugia (Asturias, Spain) 22(4):310–323Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lofgren J, von Essen C, Zwetnow NN (1973) The pressure-volume curve of the cerebrospinal fluid space in dogs. Acta Neurol Scand 49:557–574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lundberg N (1960) Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr Scand 36(supplement 149):1–193Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mokri B (2001) The Monro-Kellie hypothesis. Neurology 56(12):1746–1748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Monro A (1783) Observations on structure and functions of the nervous system. Edinburgh, Creech and JohnsonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Poca MA, Mataro M, Matarin M, Arikan F, Junque C, Sahuquillo J (2004) Is the placement of shunts in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus worth the risk? Results of a study based on continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 100:855–866CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poca MA, Martinez-Ricarte F, Sahuquillo J, Lastra R, Torne R, Armengol MS (2008) Intracranial presaure monitoring with the Neurodur-P epidural sensor: a prospective study in patients with adult hydrocephalus or idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg 108:934–942CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raboel PH, Bartek J Jr, Andersen M, Bellander BM, Romner B (2012) Intracranial pressure monitoring: invasive versus non-invasive methods—a review. Critical Care Research and Practice 2112:950393Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sæhle T, Eide PK (2015) Intracranial pressure monitoring in paediatric and adult patients with hydrocephalus and tentative shunt failure: a single centre experience over 10 years in 146 patients. J Neurosurg 122(5):1076–1086Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith M (2008) Monitoring intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Anesth Analg 106(1):204–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Toma AK, Tarnaris A, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD (2010) Continuous intracranial pressure monitoring in pseudotumour cerebri: single centre experience. Br J Neurosurg 24(5):584–588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Warden KF, Alizai AM, Trobe JD, Hoff JT (2011) Short-term continuous intraparenchymal intracranial pressure monitoring in presumed idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuroophthalmol 31(3):202–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhong J, Dujovny M, Park HK, Perez E, Perlin AR, Diaz FG (2003) Advances in ICP monitoring techniques. Neurol Res 25(4):339–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. D. Thompson
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Coutts
    • 2
  • C. L. Craven
    • 1
  • A. K. Toma
    • 1
  • L. W. Thorne
    • 1
  • L. D. Watkins
    • 1
  1. 1.Victor Horsley Department of NeurosurgeryLondonUK
  2. 2.School of Health and Social ScienceCity University, LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations