Perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy: etiology and implications
- 341 Downloads
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the procedure of choice for reducing the risk of stroke in both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenoses. Stroke is associated with significant morbidity and mortality peri-operatively (2–3 %). Our primary aim is to evaluate the etiology of these strokes after CEA and their impact on morbidity by comparing the length of stay in the hospital.
A total of 584 patients with documented neurological status evaluations who underwent CEAs were included in the study. Neurophysiological monitoring data was obtained during CEA for carotid stenosis included eight-channel electroencephalography (EEG) and upper extremity somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs).
Twenty-one (3.595 %) patients had strokes in the perioperative period and they were more likely to have left-sided surgery (p = 0.008), intraoperative monitoring (IOM) changes (p < 0.001), an intraoperative shunt placed (p = 0.0002) or a hospital stay longer than 5 days (p = 0.0042). Unilateral anterior circulation ischemic stroke were the most common in our series. In a logistic regression model, left-sided surgery was shown to be 4.78 times more likely to be associated with perioperative stroke (1.50–15.27; p = 0.008) while intraoperative shunts were 11.85 times more likely to have strokes (3.97–35.34; p < 0.0001). Patients with stenosis greater than 70 % were 6.67 times less likely to have a stroke (0.04–0.59; p = 0.007).
Ischemic anterior circulation strokes are the most common type of post-operative neurological changes in patients undergoing CEA. Intraoperative shunt placement was a strong predictor of perioperative strokes. Since shunts are only placed following intraoperative monitoring changes, SSEPs and EEG can therefore function as a biomarker of cerebral hypo-perfusion.
KeywordsPerioperative stroke Carotid endarterectomy Etiology Length of stay
Compliance with ethical standards
No funding was received for this research.
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
- 1.Avgerinos ED, Chaer RA, Naddaf A, El-Shazly OM, Marone L, Makaroun MS (2016) Primary closure after carotid endarterectomy is not inferior to other closure techniques. J Vasc Surg 678–683Google Scholar
- 3.Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Ferguson GG, Haynes RB, Rankin RN, Clagett GP, Hachinski VC, Sackett DL, Thorpe KE, Meldrum HE, Spence JD (1998) Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 339:1415–1425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cao P, De Rango P, Zannetti S (2002) Eversion vs conventional carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 23:195–201Google Scholar
- 7.Cao P, Giordano G, De Rango P, Zannetti S, Chiesa R, Coppi G, Palombo D, Peinetti F, Spartera C, Stancanelli V, Vecchiati E (2000) Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 31:19–30Google Scholar
- 8.Cao PG, de Rango P, Zannetti S, Giordano G, Ricci S, Celani MG (2001) Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD001921Google Scholar
- 10.Carotid Stenting Trialists C, Bonati LH, Dobson J, Algra A, Branchereau A, Chatellier G, Fraedrich G, Mali WP, Zeumer H, Brown MM, Mas JL, Ringleb PA (2010) Short-term outcome after stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 376:1062–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Halliday A, Harrison M, Hayter E, Kong X, Mansfield A, Marro J, Pan H, Peto R, Potter J, Rahimi K, Rau A, Robertson S, Streifler J, Thomas D, Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative G (2010) 10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 376:1074–1084CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Hill MD, Brooks W, Mackey A, Clark WM, Meschia JF, Morrish WF, Mohr JP, Rhodes JD, Popma JJ, Lal BK, Longbottom ME, Voeks JH, Howard G, Brott TG, Investigators C (2012) Stroke after carotid stenting and endarterectomy in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST). Circulation 126:3054–3061CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.International Carotid Stenting Study i, Ederle J, Dobson J, Featherstone RL, Bonati LH, van der Worp HB, de Borst GJ, Lo TH, Gaines P, Dorman PJ, Macdonald S, Lyrer PA, Hendriks JM, McCollum C, Nederkoorn PJ, Brown MM (2010) Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375:985–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Mayberg MR, Wilson SE, Yatsu F, Weiss DG, Messina L, Hershey LA, Colling C, Eskridge J, Deykin D, Winn HR (1991) Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 309 Trialist Group. JAMA 266:3289–3294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.No A (1995) Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 273:1421–1428Google Scholar
- 26.Rhee-Moore SJ, DeRubertis BG, Lam RC, Hynecek RL, Lee L, McKinsey JF, Morrissey NJ, Karwowski J, Mureebe L, Kent KC, Faries PL (2008) Periprocedural complication rates are equivalent between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients undergoing carotid angioplasty and stenting. Ann Vasc Surg 22:233–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJ, Culebras A, Elkind MS, George MG, Hamdan AD, Higashida RT, Hoh BL, Janis LS, Kase CS, Kleindorfer DO, Lee JM, Moseley ME, Peterson ED, Turan TN, Valderrama AL, Vinters HV, American Heart Association Stroke Council CoCS, Anesthesia, Council on Cardiovascular R, Intervention, Council on C, Stroke N, Council on E, Prevention, Council on Peripheral Vascular D, Council on Nutrition PA, Metabolism (2013) An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke; a J Cereb Circulat 44:2064–2089CrossRefGoogle Scholar