Pre- and postoperative correlation of patient-reported outcome measures with standardized Timed Up and Go (TUG) test results in lumbar degenerative disc disease
- 626 Downloads
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a reliable tool for evaluating objective functional impairment (OFI) in patients with degenerative disc disease before a surgical intervention. The aim of this study is to assess the validity of the TUG test to measure change in function postoperatively.
In a prospective two-center study, OFI was assessed by the TUG test in patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery, as well as 3 days (D3) and 6 weeks (W6) postoperatively. At each time point, the TUG test results were correlated with established subjective measures of pain intensity (visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain), functional impairment (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; Short Form-12 (SF12)).
The patient cohort comprised 136 patients with a mean age of 57.7 years; 76 were males, 54 had a microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation, 58 a decompression for a lumbar spinal stenosis, 24 had a surgical fusion procedure. The mean OFI t-score was 125.1 before surgery, and as patients improved on the subjective measures in the postoperative interval, the OFI t-score likewise decreased to 118.8 (D3) and 103.4 (W6). The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) between the OFI t-score and VAS leg pain was 0.187 preoperatively (p = 0.029) and 0.252 at W6 (p = 0.003). The PCC between OFI t-score and the ODI was 0.324 preoperatively (p < 0.001) and 0.413 at W6 (p < 0.001). The PCC between OFI t-score and physical HRQoL (SF12) was −0.091 preoperatively (p = 0.293) and −0.330 at W6 (p < 0.001).
The TUG test is sensitive to change, and reflects the postoperative functional outcome even more exact than preoperatively, as indicated by better correlation coefficients of the OFI t-score with subjective measures of pain intensity, functional impairment and HRQoL.
KeywordsObjective outcome measurement Timed Up and Go test Lumbar spine surgery Degenerative disc disease Postoperative outcome Objective functional impairment Correlation
The authors thank Cornelia Lüthi (study nurse of the Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen) and Dario Jucker (medical student of Zurich University) for their important contribution in the data collection.
Compliance with ethical standards
No funding was received for this research.
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Chiarotto A, Deyo RA, Terwee CB, Boers M, Buchbinder R, Corbin TP, Costa LO, Foster NE, Grotle M, Koes BW, Kovacs FM, Lin CW, Maher CG, Pearson AM, Peul WC, Schoene ML, Turk DC, van Tulder MW, Ostelo RW (2015) Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J 24:1127–1142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY (2008) Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 8:968–974CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Gautschi OP, Corniola MV, Joswig H, Smoll NR, Chau I, Jucker D, Stienen MN (2015) The Timed Up and Go test for lumbar degenerative disc disease. J Clin Neurosci 22:1943–1948Google Scholar
- 7.Gautschi OP, Smoll NR, Corniola MV, Joswig H, Chau I, Hildebrandt G, Schaller K, Stienen MN (2016) Validity and reliability of a measurement of objective functional impairment in lumbar degenerative disc disease: the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Neurosurgery 79:270–278Google Scholar
- 8.Gautschi OP, Corniola MV, Smoll NR, Joswig H, Schaller K, Hildebrandt G, Stienen MN (2016) Sex differences in subjective and objective measures of pain, functional impairment and health-related quality of life in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease. Pain 157:1065–1071Google Scholar
- 9.Gautschi OP, Stienen MN, Corniola MV, Joswig H, Schaller K, Hildebrandt G, Smoll NR (2016) Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test after surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease. Neurosurgery. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001320