Intraoperative 3D contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): a prospective study of 50 patients with brain tumours
Reliable intraoperative resection control during surgery of malignant brain tumours is associated with the longer overall survival of patients. B-mode ultrasound (BUS) is a familiar intraoperative imaging application in neurosurgical procedures and supplies excellent image quality. However, due to resection-induced artefacts, its ability to distinguish between tumour borders, oedema, surrounding tissue and tumour remnants is sometimes limited. In experienced hands, this “bright rim effect” could be reduced. However, it should be determined, if contrast-enhanced ultrasound can improve this situation by providing high-quality imaging during the resection. The aim of this clinical study was to examine contrast-enhanced and three-dimensional reconstructed ultrasound (3D CEUS) in brain tumour surgery regarding the uptake of contrast agent pre- and post-tumour resection, imaging quality and in comparison with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in different tumour entities.
Fifty patients, suffering from various brain tumours intra-axial and extra-axial, who had all undergone surgery with the support of neuronavigation in our neurosurgical department, were included in the study. Their median age was 56 years (range, 28–79). Ultrasound imaging was performed before the Dura was opened and for resection control at the end of tumour resection as defined by the neurosurgeon. A high-end ultrasound (US) device (Toshiba Aplio XG®) with linear and sector probes for B-mode and CEUS was used. Navigation and 3D reconstruction were performed with a LOCALITE SonoNavigator® and the images were transferred digitally (DVI) to the navigation system. The contrast agent consists of echoic micro-bubbles showing tumour vascularisation. The ultrasound images were compared with the corresponding postoperative MR data in order to determine the accuracy and imaging quality of the tumours and tumour remnants after resection.
Different types of tumours were investigated. High, dynamic contrast agent uptake was observed in 19 of 21 patients (90 %) suffering from glioblastoma, while in 2 patients uptake was low and insufficient. In 52.4 % of glioblastoma and grade III astrocytoma patients CEUS led to an improved delineation in comparison to BUS and showed a high-resolution imaging quality of the tumour margins and tumour boarders. Grade II and grade III astrocytoma (n = 6) as well as metastasis (n = 18) also showed high contrast agent uptake, which led in 50 % to an improved imaging quality. In 5 of these 17 patients, intraoperative CEUS for resection control showed tumour remnants, leading to further tumour resection. Patients treated with CEUS showed no increased neurological deficits after tumour resection. No pharmacological side-effects occurred.
Three-dimensional CEUS is a reliable intraoperative imaging modality and could improve imaging quality. Ninety percent of the high-grade gliomas (HGG, glioblastoma and astrocytoma grade III) showed high contrast uptake with an improved imaging quality in more than 50 %. Gross total resection and incomplete resection of glioblastoma were adequately highlighted by 3D CEUS intraoperatively. The application of US contrast agent could be a helpful imaging tool, especially for resection control in glioblastoma surgery.
KeywordsIntraoperative ultrasound Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Resection control Brain tumour surgery Navigated ultrasound
Compliance with ethical standards
DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) provided financial support in the form of hardware and personal costs funding. The sponsor had no role in the design or execution of this research.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflicts of interest
- 1.Coburger J, König RW, Scheuerle A, Engelke J, Hlavac M, Thal DR, Wirtz CR (2014) Navigated high frequency ultrasound: description of technique and clinical comparison with conventional intracranial ultrasound. World Surg 82:366–75Google Scholar
- 2.Lindner D, Trantakis C, Arnold S, Schmitgen A, Schneider J, Meixensberger J (2005) Neuronavigation based on intraoperative 3D-ultrasound during tumor resection. Proceedings of computer assisted radiology and surgery. CARS. 815–820Google Scholar
- 10.Mert A, Buehler K, Sutherland GR, Tomanek B, Widhalm G, Kasprian G, Knosp E, Wolfsberger S (2012) Brain tumor surgery with 3-dimensional surface navigation. Neurosurgery 71:286–94Google Scholar
- 18.Kate GL, van Dijk AC, van den Oord SC, Hussain B, Verhagen HJ, Sijbrands EJ, van der Steen AF, van der Lugt A, Schinkel AF (2013) Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for detection of carotid plaque ulceration in patients with symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol 112:292–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Park KH, Kwon SH, Lee YS, Jeong SW, Jang JY, Lee SH, Kim SG, Cha SW, Kim YS, Cho YD, Kim HS, Kim BS, Kim YJ (2015) Predictive factors of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the response to transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 21:158–64CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.Prada F, Mattei L, DelBene M, Aiani L, Saini M (2014) Intraoperative cerebral glioma characterization with contrast enhanced ultrasound. Biomed Res Int. 484261Google Scholar