Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 158, Issue 1, pp 125–133 | Cite as

Promising clinical outcome of elderly with TBI after modern neurointensive care

  • Abraham Merzo
  • Samuel Lenell
  • Lena Nyholm
  • Per Enblad
  • Anders LewénEmail author
Clinical Article - Brain Injury

Abstract

Background

The increasing number of elderly patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) leads to specific neurointensive care (NIC) challenges. Therefore, elderly subjects with TBI need to be further studied. In this study we evaluated the demographics, management and outcome of elderly TBI patients receiving modern NIC.

Methods

Patients referred to our NIC unit between 2008 and 2010 were included. Patients were divided in two age groups, elderly (E) ≥65 years and younger (Y) 64–15 years. Parameters studied were the dominant finding on CT scans, neurological motor skills and consciousness, type of monitoring, neurosurgical procedures/treatments and Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score at 6 months after injury.

Results

Sixty-two E (22 %) and 222 Y (78 %) patients were included. Falls were more common in E (81 %) and vehicle accidents were more common in Y patients (37 %). Acute subdural hematoma was significantly more common in E (50 % of cases) compared to Y patients (18 %). Intracranial pressure was monitored in 44 % of E and 57 % of Y patients. Evacuation of significant mass lesions was performed more common in the E group. The NIC mortality was similar in both groups (4–6 %). Favorable outcome was observed in 72 % of Y and 51 % of E patients. At the time of follow-up 25 % of E and 7 % of Y patients had died.

Conclusions

The outcome of elderly patients with TBI was significantly worse than in younger patients, as expected. However, as much as 51 % of the elderly patients showed a favorable outcome after NIC. We believe that these results encourage modern NIC in elderly patients with TBI. We need to study how secondary brain injury mechanisms differ in the older patients and to identify specific outcome predictors for elderly patients with TBI.

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury Outcome Elderly Neurointensive care Secondary injury 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Uppsala Clinical Research Center (Uppsala University) for the help with the TBI register. The study was supported by The Swedish Research Council and The Selanders Foundation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethics

The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements) or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, Manley GT, Nemecek A, Newell DW, Rosenthal G, Schouten J, Shutter L, Timmons SD, Ullman JS, Videtta W, Wilberger JE, Wright DW, Foundation BT, Surgeons AAoN, Surgeons CoN, Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care AANSC (2007) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma 24(Suppl 1):S37–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brazinova A, Mauritz W, Leitgeb J, Wilbacher I, Majdan M, Janciak I, Rusnak M (2010) Outcomes of patients with severe traumatic brain injury who have Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 3 or 4 and are over 65 years old. J Neurotrauma 27:1549–1555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cagetti B, Cossu M, Pau A, Rivano C, Viale G (1992) The outcome from acute subdural and epidural intracranial haematomas in very elderly patients. Br J Neurosurg 6:227–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Czosnyka M, Balestreri M, Steiner L, Smielewski P, Hutchinson PJ, Matta B, Pickard JD (2005) Age, intracranial pressure, autoregulation, and outcome after brain trauma. J Neurosurg 102:450–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Bonis P, Pompucci A, Mangiola A, Paternoster G, Festa R, Nucci CG, Maviglia R, Antonelli M, Anile C (2011) Decompressive craniectomy for elderly patients with traumatic brain injury: it's probably not worth the while. J Neurotrauma 28:2043–2048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deandrea S, Lucenteforte E, Bravi F, Foschi R, La Vecchia C, Negri E (2010) Risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology 21:658–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    El-Khoury F, Cassou B, Charles MA, Dargent-Molina P (2013) The effect of fall prevention exercise programmes on fall induced injuries in community dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 347:f6234PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elf K, Nilsson P, Enblad P (2002) Outcome after traumatic brain injury improved by an organized secondary insult program and standardized neurointensive care. Crit Care Med 30:2129–2134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ely EW, Evans GW, Haponik EF (1999) Mechanical ventilation in a cohort of elderly patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Ann Intern Med 131:96–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fischerstrom A, Nyholm L, Lewen A, Enblad P (2014) Acute neurosurgery for traumatic brain injury by general surgeons in Swedish county hospitals: a regional study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fletcher AE, Khalid S, Mallonee S (2007) The epidemiology of severe traumatic brain injury among persons 65 years of age and older in Oklahoma, 1992-2003. Brain Inj 21:691–699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frankel JE, Marwitz JH, Cifu DX, Kreutzer JS, Englander J, Rosenthal M (2006) A follow-up study of older adults with traumatic brain injury: taking into account decreasing length of stay. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:57–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gan BK, Lim JH, Ng IH (2004) Outcome of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury amongst the elderly in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singap 33:63–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hermans G, De Jonghe B, Bruyninckx F, Van den Berghe G (2008) Clinical review: critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy. Crit Care 12:238PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Howard MA, Gross AS, Dacey RG, Winn HR (1989) Acute subdural hematomas: an age-dependent clinical entity. J Neurosurg 71:858–863PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hukkelhoven CW, Steyerberg EW, Rampen AJ, Farace E, Habbema JD, Marshall LF, Murray GD, Maas AI (2003) Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patients. J Neurosurg 99:666–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ingebrigtsen T, Mortensen K, Romner B (1998) The epidemiology of hospital-referred head injury in northern Norway. Neuroepidemiology 17:139–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jennett B, Teasdale G, Braakman R, Minderhoud J, Heiden J, Kurze T (1979) Prognosis of patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 4:283–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karni A, Holtzman R, Bass T, Zorman G, Carter L, Rodriguez L, Bennett-Shipman VJ, Lottenberg L (2001) Traumatic head injury in the anticoagulated elderly patient: a lethal combination. Am Surg 67:1098–1100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lenell S, Nyholm L, Lewen A, Enblad P (2015) Updated periodic evaluation of standardized neurointensive care shows that it is possible to maintain a high level of favorable outcome even with increasing mean age. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 157:417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McIntyre A, Mehta S, Janzen S, Aubut J, Teasell RW (2013) A meta-analysis of functional outcome among older adults with traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 32:409–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mina AA, Knipfer JF, Park DY, Bair HA, Howells GA, Bendick PJ (2002) Intracranial complications of preinjury anticoagulation in trauma patients with head injury. J Trauma 53:668–672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mosenthal AC, Lavery RF, Addis M, Kaul S, Ross S, Marburger R, Deitch EA, Livingston DH (2002) Isolated traumatic brain injury: age is an independent predictor of mortality and early outcome. J Trauma 52:907–911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mosenthal AC, Livingston DH, Lavery RF, Knudson MM, Lee S, Morabito D, Manley GT, Nathens A, Jurkovich G, Hoyt DB, Coimbra R (2004) The effect of age on functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: 6-month report of a prospective multicenter trial. J Trauma 56:1042–1048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mushkudiani NA, Engel DC, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, Lu J, Marmarou A, Slieker F, McHugh GS, Murray GD, Maas AI (2007) Prognostic value of demographic characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 24:259–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nguyen DV, Shaw LC, Grant MB (2012) Inflammation in the pathogenesis of microvascular complications in diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 3:170Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nyholm L, Howells T, Enblad P, Lewén A (2013) Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome. Ups J Med Sci 118:169–180PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Panel on Prevention of Falls in Older Persons AGS, British Geriatrics S (2011) Summary of the Updated American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society clinical practice guideline for prevention of falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 59:148–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ramanathan DM, McWilliams N, Schatz P, Hillary FG (2012) Epidemiological shifts in elderly traumatic brain injury: 18-year trends in Pennsylvania. J Neurotrauma 29:1371–1378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Salottolo K, Levy AS, Slone DS, Mains CW, Bar-Or D (2014) The effect of age on Glasgow Coma Scale score in patients with traumatic brain injury. JAMA Surg 149:727–734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    SCB (2009) The future population of Sweden 2009-2060. Demographic reports 2009:1 http://www.scb.se/statistik/_publikationer/BE0401_2009I60_BR_BE51BR0901ENG.pdf Accessed August 28, 2015
  32. 32.
    Sendroy-Terrill M, Whiteneck GG, Brooks CA (2010) Aging with traumatic brain injury: cross-sectional follow-up of people receiving inpatient rehabilitation over more than 3 decades. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:489–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Starmark JE, Stålhammar D, Holmgren E (1988) The Reaction Level Scale (RLS85). Manual and guidelines. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 91:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stefan M, Iglesia Lino L, Fernandez G (2011) Medical consultation and best practices for preoperative evaluation of elderly patients. Hosp Pract (1995) 39:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stocchetti N, Paternò R, Citerio G, Beretta L, Colombo A (2012) Traumatic brain injury in an aging population. J Neurotrauma 29:1119–1125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Styrke J, Stålnacke BM, Sojka P, Björnstig U (2007) Traumatic brain injuries in a well-defined population: epidemiological aspects and severity. J Neurotrauma 24:1425–1436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Talving P, Karamanos E, Teixeira PG, Skiada D, Lam L, Belzberg H, Inaba K, Demetriades D (2013) Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe head injury: compliance with Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines and effect on outcomes: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 119:1248–1254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Taussky P, Widmer HR, Takala J, Fandino J (2008) Outcome after acute traumatic subdural and epidural haematoma in Switzerland: a single-centre experience. Swiss Med Wkly 138:281–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2:81–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Teasdale GM, Pettigrew LE, Wilson JT, Murray G, Jennett B (1998) Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma 15:587–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Thompson HJ, McCormick WC, Kagan SH (2006) Traumatic brain injury in older adults: epidemiology, outcomes, and future implications. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:1590–1595PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tokutomi T, Miyagi T, Ogawa T, Ono J, Kawamata T, Sakamoto T, Shigemori M, Nakamura N (2008) Age-associated increases in poor outcomes after traumatic brain injury: a report from the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank. J Neurotrauma 25:1407–1414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vollmer DG, Torner JC, Jane JA, Sadovnic B, Charlebois D, Eisenberg HM, Foulkes MA, Marmarou A, Marshall LF (1991) Age and outcome following traumatic coma: why do older patients fare worse? J Neurosurg Spec Suppl 75:S37–S49Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neuroscience, NeurosurgeryUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations